Difference between revisions of "MRP: Chancery Cases"

Revision as of 20:16, October 30, 2011

Mid-C17th Chancery cases

This page provides a listing of selected Court of Chancery cases relevant to an understanding of Oxenden family commercial ventures and family (Aylmer, Dallison, Oxenden, Piers, Stanley) litigation over domestic issues involving the Court of Chancery

Litigation involving Thomas Stanley, father-in-law of Elizabeth's son Maximilian Dallison

C 9/240/194 f. 1

C 10/14/38 f. 1
C 10/14/38 f. 2

C 22/968/8 f. 1
C 22/968/8 f. 2

Litigation involving Sir James Oxenden, father of Elizabeth Dallison

C22/955/10 f. 1
C22/955/10 f. 2
C22/955/10 f. 3

Litigation involving Sir Thomas Piers, brother-in-law of Elizabeth Dallison

Litigation involving Edward Kelke, lawyer friend of Elizabeth Dallison

C 9/242/63
C 9/242/65

C 9/243/65 f. 1 Needs to be completed

C 9/243/66 Dallison v. Skipper and Smith, 1666
C 9/243/66 f. 1
C 9/243/66 f. 2
C 9/243/66 f. 3
C 9/243/66 f. 4

C 22/52/40 f. 1
C 22/52/40 f. 2
C 22/52/40 f. 3

Litigation involving Robert Raworth

C6/133/9 f. 1
C6/133/9 f. 3

Litigation involving Captain/Sir William Ryder

Captain, later Sir, William Ryder was an active London based merchant from at least the 1640s till his death in 1670. Prior to that he appears to have been a sea captain, working Mediterranean routes. He was involved in a significant number of Chancery cases over varied issues, some of which are listed here. Firstly, a suit brought by Sir Richard Ford and John Buckworth against Sir William Ryder and William Cuttler, all having been joint partners in a joint stock for the importation of iron and copper from Stockholm, Sweden, for use in the Guinea trade. At issue were loans to the joint stock from William Ryder's former servant, Richard Bayly, who was now his son-in-law, and from the London goldsmith, John Colvile. The payment and indeed the existence of the loans were disputed (C5/53/26 ff. 1-3). Secondly, a suit was brought by James Modyford and number of of London merchants and executors of deceased London merchants, who were part owners of the Thomas and William. These part owners and fellow plaintiffs included Sir William Ryder, Sir George Smith, and Maurice Thompson. At dispute was XXXX (C 6/151Pt2/28 ff. 1-2). Thirdly, a dispute about bills of exchange which had been drawn on Sir William Ryder's name at the request of Thomas Marsham, a now deceased London merchant, whose name had been damaged by involvement in the royalist camp. The satisfaction of the bills by Marsham through forgiveness of debt by another London merchant, William Gomeldon, was disputed by Marsham's executors (C10/58/29, ff. 1-32). Fourthly, a suit was brought by the English East India Company against a number of part owners of the Royal James and Henry, which had been chartered by the plaintiffs. The suit concerned illegal trade goods, which allegedly had been loaded on board the ship at the Downs, prior to the Royal James and Henry sailing for Madras. Defendants were Sir George Smith, Sir William Rider, Edward Wood and Maurice Thompson (C10/99/70) and John Park, Edward Wood's former servant (C10/99/66). Fifthly, a suit was brought by a former partner of Sir William Ryder, the London merchant William Cuttler. At issue was the performance and distribution of provision of a partnership of Ryder, Cutler and George Cocke. The partnership had been formed to fulfill a series of important naval contracts for the importation of hemp, tar and pitch from the Baltic, which ran between 1662 and ?1665. Edward Backwell, a leading London goldsmith, was subsequently brought into an altered partnership (C10/155/38 ff. 1-3)

C5/53/26 f. 1
C5/53/26 f. 2
C5/53/26 f. 3

C 6/151Pt2/28 f. 1
C 6/151Pt2/28 f. 2
C 6/151Pt2/28 f. 3

C10/58/29 f. 1
C10/58/29 f. 2

C10/99/66 f. 1
C10/99/70 f. 1

C10/155/38 f. 1
C10/155/38 f. 2
C10/155/38 f. 3

Litigation involving English East India Company

C10/99/64 f. 1
C10/99/65 f. 1
C10/99/67 f. 1
C10/99/68 f. 1

Litigation involving merchant subscribers to SVJS, but not directly related to SVJS or to the Oxenden family

C 10/74/1 Roger Andrewes, John Connis, William Pennoyer, Francis Dashwood and Edward Crispe v Frederick Skinner: money matters, Middx. 1664
C 10/19/66 Robert Levett v Jacob Searle, Nicholas Gould, Robert Abdy, William Williams, Andrew Rickards, Nathan Wright and others: money matters, Middlesex. Bill and answer. 1653

Oxenden vs Dallison litigation following Elizabeth Dallison's death

C 9/40/48 f. 1
C 9/40/48 f. 2
C 9/40/48 f. 3
C 9/40/48 f. 4
C 9/40/48 f. 5

C 9/40/57 ff. 1-2
C 9/40/57 ff. 3-4
C 9/40/57 f. 5
C 9/40/57 f. 6
C 9/40/57 f. 7

C 9/49/48 f. 1
C 9/49/48 f. 2

Litigation involving Henry Oxinden of Barham and Denne family

C22/969/42

Loyal Merchant litigation

C10/488/141

SVJS & KF litigation

Thirty separately indexed Chancery documents have been identified in the National Archives which are related to Sir George Oxenden’s ventures in 1655-1659. A significant number are indexed under titles which are not obviously linked to Sir George Oxenden. The documents fall into four series, of which C9 and C10 are the dominant ones, with thirteen records in the C9 category and fifteen records in the C10 category. There is one record in C5 and one record in C22.

C5

C5/58/51

C9

C9/28/10
C9/29/37
C9/30/96
C9/47/10
C9/59/10
C9/232/127
C9/243/71
C9/243/130
C9/229/52
C9/236/131
C9/243/13X
C9/405/357
C9/409/92

C10

C10/60/30 f. 1
C10/60/30 f. 2
C10/60/30 f. 3
C10/60/30 f. 4
C10/65/99
C10/82/2
C10/87/49
C10/90/73
C10/106/142
C10/109/102
C10/158/94
C10/172/61
C10/173/72
C10/469/40
C10/470/103
C10/471/114
C10/477/19
C10/492/28

C22

C22/1036/34

Chancery case listing by archival category

Fuller details of the documents are listed below, with links to images, transcriptions, and/or summaries of the documents

C 3/429/50 Short title: Stone v Dalison. 1640-1642

C 9/40/57 Oxenden v. Dallison and Stanley 1668
File(C 9_40_58 Oxenden v. Dallison, 1668)
C 9/49/48 Dalison v. Oxenden, 1667
C 9/240/194 Stanley v. Walsall 1650
C 9/242/63 Dallison v. Skepper 1658
C 9/243/66 Dallison v. Skipper and Smith 1666

C 10/14/38 William Cane v Barnabas Walsall and Thomas Stanley: Rochester, Kent 1651
C 10/19/66 Robert Levett v Jacob Searle, Nicholas Gould, Robert Abdy, William Williams, Andrew Rickards, Nathan Wright and others: money matters, Middlesex. Bill and answer 1653
C 10/57/109 Gore, Woodward and Meggs v. East India company, Governor & c. and others 1652
C 10/74/1 Roger Andrewes, John Connis, William Pennoyer, Francis Dashwood and Edward Crispe v Frederick Skinner: money matters, Middx. 1664

C 22/58/39 Dalyson v. Oxinden. Between 1558 and 1714
C 22/968/8 Cane v. Stanley Between 1558 and 1714

C 142/483/82 Dallyson, Maximilian, knight: Kent 8 Charles I
C 142/623/52 Dallyson, William: Kent 20 Charles I.

Chancery case listing by document date

Fuller details of the documents are listed below, with links to images, transcriptions, and/or summaries of the documents.

Legal issues by case

- Concealment of assets as a failed commercial man (C 10/14/38, C 22/968/8)
- Contesting a will as unnatural (C 9/243/66)
- Power and title over an estate (C 9/49/48, C 9/40/57)
- Unauthorised sale of goods and attempt to recover goods (C 10/19/66)
- Concealment and/or theft of deeds (C10/12/128)

@@ Line 86: / Line 86: @@
 ===Litigation involving Captain/Sir William Ryder===
-Captain, later Sir, William Ryder was an active London based merchant from at least the 1640s till his death in 1670.  Prior to that he appears to have been a sea captain, working Mediterranean routes.  He was involved in a significant number of Chancery cases over varied issues, some of which are listed here.  Firstly, a suit brought by Sir Richard Ford and John Buckworth against Sir William Ryder and William Cuttler, all having been joint partners in a joint stock for the importation of iron and copper from Stockholm, Sweden, for use in the Guinea trade.  At issue were loans to the joint stock from William Ryder's former servant, Richard Bayly, who was now his son-in-law, and from the London goldsmith, John Colvile.  The payment and indeed the existence of the loans were disputed (C5/53/26 ff. 1-3).  Secondly, a suit was brought by James Modyford and number of of London merchants and executors of deceased London merchants, who were part owners of the ''Thomas and William.''  These part owners and fellow plaintiffs included Sir William Ryder, Sir George Smith, and Maurice Thompson.  At dispute was XXXX (C 6/151Pt2/28 ff. 1-2).  Thirdly, a dispute about bills of exchange which had been drawn on Sir William Ryder's name at the request of Thomas Marsham, a now deceased London merchant, whose name had been damaged by involvement in the royalist camp. The satisfaction of the bills by Marsham through forgiveness of debt by another London merchant, William Gomeldon, was disputed by Marsham's executors (C10/58/29, ff. 1-32).  Fourthly, a suit was brought by the English East India Company against a number of part owners of the ''Royal James and Henry'', which had been chartered by the plaintiffs.  The suit concerned illegal trade goods, which allegedly had been loaded on board the ship at the Downs, prior to the ''Royal James and Henry'' sailing for Madras.  Defendants were Sir George Smith, Sir William Rider, Edward Wood and Maurice Thompson (C10/99/70) and John Park, Edward Wood's former servant (C10/99/66).  Fifthly, a suit was brought by a former partner of Sir William Ryder by the London merchant William Cuttler.  At issue was the performance and distribution of provision of a partnership of Ryder, Cutler and George Cocke.  The partnership had been formed to fulfill a series of important naval contracts for the importation of hemp, tar and pitch from the Baltic, which ran between 1662 and ?1665 (C10/155/38 ff. 1-3)
+Captain, later Sir, William Ryder was an active London based merchant from at least the 1640s till his death in 1670.  Prior to that he appears to have been a sea captain, working Mediterranean routes.  He was involved in a significant number of Chancery cases over varied issues, some of which are listed here.  Firstly, a suit brought by Sir Richard Ford and John Buckworth against Sir William Ryder and William Cuttler, all having been joint partners in a joint stock for the importation of iron and copper from Stockholm, Sweden, for use in the Guinea trade.  At issue were loans to the joint stock from William Ryder's former servant, Richard Bayly, who was now his son-in-law, and from the London goldsmith, John Colvile.  The payment and indeed the existence of the loans were disputed (C5/53/26 ff. 1-3).  Secondly, a suit was brought by James Modyford and number of of London merchants and executors of deceased London merchants, who were part owners of the ''Thomas and William.''  These part owners and fellow plaintiffs included Sir William Ryder, Sir George Smith, and Maurice Thompson.  At dispute was XXXX (C 6/151Pt2/28 ff. 1-2).  Thirdly, a dispute about bills of exchange which had been drawn on Sir William Ryder's name at the request of Thomas Marsham, a now deceased London merchant, whose name had been damaged by involvement in the royalist camp. The satisfaction of the bills by Marsham through forgiveness of debt by another London merchant, William Gomeldon, was disputed by Marsham's executors (C10/58/29, ff. 1-32).  Fourthly, a suit was brought by the English East India Company against a number of part owners of the ''Royal James and Henry'', which had been chartered by the plaintiffs.  The suit concerned illegal trade goods, which allegedly had been loaded on board the ship at the Downs, prior to the ''Royal James and Henry'' sailing for Madras.  Defendants were Sir George Smith, Sir William Rider, Edward Wood and Maurice Thompson (C10/99/70) and John Park, Edward Wood's former servant (C10/99/66).  Fifthly, a suit was brought by a former partner of Sir William Ryder, the London merchant William Cuttler.  At issue was the performance and distribution of provision of a partnership of Ryder, Cutler and George Cocke.  The partnership had been formed to fulfill a series of important naval contracts for the importation of hemp, tar and pitch from the Baltic, which ran between 1662 and ?1665. Edward Backwell, a leading London goldsmith, was subsequently brought into an altered partnership (C10/155/38 ff. 1-3)
 [[MRP: C5/53/26 f. 1|C5/53/26 f. 1]]