| Transcription
|
he hath knowne the said Lopez de Apastris … he hath knowne the said Lopez de Apastris for these<br />
sixteene yeares last past, and that of his certaine knowledge<br />
the sayd Lopez de Apastris hath for seaven yeares<br />
last past bin, and at present is an Inhabitant with his<br />
family, a Citizen and a Merchant of Sevill in<br />
Spayne, and soe consequently a Subiect of The king of<br />
Spayne, And further he cannot depose.
To the last he saith his former deposition is true./
To the Interrogatoryes ministred on the behalfe<br />
of his highnesse the Lord protector./ [CENTRE HEADING]
To the first Interrogatory he answereth that the factors or Agents<br />
of the producent did advise him this Respondent that the<br />
shipp interrate the ''hare in the feild'' was a holland shipp<br />
That he this Rendent is a Spaniard by birth, borne at Villa<br />
ffranca in Biscay, that for fower yeares last past he<br />
hath been resident here in London, and that for three<br />
yeares before he was constantly resident in Sevill, And<br />
to all the rest of the sayd Interrogatory he answereth negatively.
To the second Interrogatory he answereth that he hath satisfyed it<br />
in his foregoeing deposition.
To the third Interrogatory he answereth that he hath knowne the<br />
interrate De Baud for about sixeteene yeares and the interrate<br />
de la ffitt for about eight yeares, that he first knew them<br />
in Spayne, and that they went for Gascoynes, but he<br />
knoweth not where they were borne yet beleiveth them to<br />
be ffrenchmen by birth, that during the time of his this<br />
Responedents knowing them they have bin sometimes in Spayne<br />
and sometimes in ffrance, And otherwise referring himselfe<br />
to his foregoeing depositions he cannot answeare./
To the fourth Interrogatory he answereth that the Linnens interrate<br />
were bought for the account of the said Lopez de Apastris<br />
by the said De Baud and De La ffitt his Agents and<br />
ffactors or one of them, at Roane about the month of March<br />
last past (as he beleiveth) with the proceed of the woolls by<br />
him predeposed of, but he saith he knoweth not whether the<br />
said proceed of the woolls was ready money or other goods,<br />
(he the Rendent being then here in London) And he answereth<br />
that he referreth himselfe to his former deposition and further<br />
cannot answeare,
To the fifth and sixth Interrogatoryes he answereth that he was in<br />
London when the matters conteynedin these Interrogatoryes were<br />
done beyond the seas, and therfore cannot answere therunto
To the seaventh Interrogatory he answereth that though he the<br />
Rendent was here in London when the bill of Lading interrate<br />
was signed and firmed, and he being here in London did<br />
receive the bill of Lading for the Linnens predeposed of signed or<br />
firmed by the Master John kein, Yet he beleiveth that the<br />
said bill of Lading was noe wise colourable or fictitious, for<br />
that the said bil of Lading did in every thing agree in<br />
the marks and Number and consignement with his Letters<br />
of advise he received concerning the said Linnens And<br />
further he cannot answere.And<br />
further he cannot answere. +
|
