HCA 13/70 f.466r Annotate
| Volume | HCA 13/70 |
|---|---|
| Folio | 466 |
| Side | Recto |
| ← Previous Page | |
| Status | |
| Uploaded image; transcribed on 15/01/2015 | |
| Note | |
| IMAGE: IMG_0545.JPG | |
| First transcriber | |
| Colin Greenstreet | |
| First transcribed | |
| 2015/01/15 | |
Contents
[hide]Expand this area to see details of page purpose, how to register, how to add footnotes, and useful links.
Image
Transcription
he hath knowne the said Lopez de Apastris for these
sixteene yeares last past, and that of his certaine knowledge
the sayd Lopez de Apastris hath for seaven yeares
last past bin, and at present is an Inhabitant with his
family, a Citizen and a Merchant of Sevill in
Spayne, and soe consequently a Subiect of The king of
Spayne, And further he cannot depose.
To the last he saith his former deposition is true./
To the Interrogatoryes ministred on the behalfe
of his highnesse the Lord protector./ [CENTRE HEADING]
To the first Interrogatory he answereth that the factors or Agents
of the producent did advise him this Respondent that the
shipp interrate the hare in the feild was a holland shipp
That he this Rendent is a Spaniard by birth, borne at Villa
ffranca in Biscay, that for fower yeares last past he
hath been resident here in London, and that for three
yeares before he was constantly resident in Sevill, And
to all the rest of the sayd Interrogatory he answereth negatively.
To the second Interrogatory he answereth that he hath satisfyed it
in his foregoeing deposition.
To the third Interrogatory he answereth that he hath knowne the
interrate De Baud for about sixeteene yeares and the interrate
de la ffitt for about eight yeares, that he first knew them
in Spayne, and that they went for Gascoynes, but he
knoweth not where they were borne yet beleiveth them to
be ffrenchmen by birth, that during the time of his this
Responedents knowing them they have bin sometimes in Spayne
and sometimes in ffrance, And otherwise referring himselfe
to his foregoeing depositions he cannot answeare./
To the fourth Interrogatory he answereth that the Linnens interrate
were bought for the account of the said Lopez de Apastris
by the said De Baud and De La ffitt his Agents and
ffactors or one of them, at Roane about the month of March
last past (as he beleiveth) with the proceed of the woolls by
him predeposed of, but he saith he knoweth not whether the
said proceed of the woolls was ready money or other goods,
(he the Rendent being then here in London) And he answereth
that he referreth himselfe to his former deposition and further
cannot answeare,
To the fifth and sixth Interrogatoryes he answereth that he was in
London when the matters conteynedin these Interrogatoryes were
done beyond the seas, and therfore cannot answere therunto
To the seaventh Interrogatory he answereth that though he the
Rendent was here in London when the bill of Lading interrate
was signed and firmed, and he being here in London did
receive the bill of Lading for the Linnens predeposed of signed or
firmed by the Master John kein, Yet he beleiveth that the
said bill of Lading was noe wise colourable or fictitious, for
that the said bil of Lading did in every thing agree in
the marks and Number and consignement with his Letters
of advise he received concerning the said Linnens And
further he cannot answere.
