| Transcription
|
what is before declared and saith it will … what is before declared and saith it will bee neither profitt nor preiudice to him<br />
this rendent whichsoever of the parties litigant prevaile, and that hee desyreth<br />
right may prevaile therein, and to the rest of the Interrogatorie hee answereth negatively./
To the second hee saith hee knew the ''John and Elizabeth'' Interrogate at her being<br />
at Saint Lucar in the yeare one thousand sixe hundred fifty fower and saith hee was none of the sayd shipps<br />
Company the voyage in question And further cannot answere/
To the third and 4th Interrogatories hee saith hee well knoweth that the shipp or Catch<br />
the ''John and Elizabeth'' did come into Saint Lucar in a very sadd condition with<br />
her masts broken and other wise much damnified and only the Master<br />
John Keene (who laye very sicke aboard and soe continued for about three weekes after her coming to Saint Lucar) and her mate and a boy on board her, And saith that by the<br />
relation and report of the sayd Keene and her sayd mate and boy made<br />
to this deponent and his contest Mr Watts and others, the sayd shipp or<br />
Ketch was soe damnified by storme at Sea, as also by an other shipp<br />
falling fowle of her at Sea, and that by reason of the sayd other shipps<br />
falling fowle of her all the rest of the ''John and Elizabeths'' Company forsooke<br />
her and went away in the sayd other shipp and came noe more on board her,<br />
And further to this Interrogatorie hee cannot answere saveing in his this<br />
deponents Judgment the sayd shipp or Ketch ''John and Elizabeth'' was soe disabled<br />
at her comming into Saint Lucar that shee was not fitt to goe to sea againe till<br />
shee were in some measure repayred, and saving that hee beleeveth the goods<br />
which were put on shoare out of the ''John and Elizabeth'' would have suffered<br />
much dammage if they had not bin put on shoare, and saith that such goods<br />
as were put on shoare were put in to the hands of his Contest Mr Watts<br />
and his this deponent and the sayd Cowse hath since receaved an Accompt from<br />
the sayd Mr Watts of their receipt of the sayd goods put a shoare and what because of them./
To the 5th and 6th Interrogatories hee saith that after the sayd Keene had<br />
landed a great part of the sayd Cowse his goods at Saint Lucar and left them in the<br />
possession of the sayd Mr Watts and this deponent, hee the sayd Keene did<br />
cause the sayd shipp or Ketch the ''John and Elizabeth'' to bee at Saint Lucar<br />
in some measure repayred and amended which hee did with moneys which<br />
this respondent and the sayd Mr Watts did furnish him with in part of<br />
payment for the goods they had receaved, and gave Mr Cowse<br />
an Accompt thereof, And saith in his Judgment Saint Lucar is a fitt port<br />
to repaire a shipp in and all materiells are there to bee had, but not<br />
deere rates And further hee cannot answere./
To the 7th Interrogatorie hee saith that hee well knoweth that the Shipp or<br />
Ketch ''John and Elizabeth'' did receave such and soe much ladeing as hee<br />
this respondent and the sayd Mr Watts could procure for her there to goe<br />
for London but the quantitie hee remembreth not And further to this<br />
Interrogatorie hee cannot answere./
To the 8th Interrogatorie hee saith saving his subsequent<br />
deposition hee cannot depose./
To the 9th Interrogatorie hee saith saving his answeres to the 3d and 4th Interrogatories to<br />
which hee referreth hee cannot more fully answere to this Interrogatorie
To the 10th hee saith hee well knoweth of his certayne knowledge that the<br />
Interrogateknowledge that the<br />
Interrogate +
|
