| Primary sources
|
'''TNA'''
<u>Chancery</u>
C … '''TNA'''
<u>Chancery</u>
C 6/389/59 Short title: Colston v Wyndham. Plaintiffs: Edward Colston merchant of London. Defendants: Mary Wyndham widow, Sir John Trevelyan baronet, of Nettlecombe, Somerset, Thomas Drewe esq, of Broadhembury, Devon, James Sheppard gent, of Honiton, Devon, Amos Bampfield esq, of Culverhayes, Somerset, Arabella Bampfield (alias Arabella Wyndham) his wife, Amos Grymes clerk, Sarah Grymes his wife, Christabella Wyndham, Joanne Wyndham, Frances Wyndham, Elizabeth Wyndham, Carolina Wyndham the younger, Carolina Wyndham the elder and Shem Bridges clerk of the court of Chancery. Subject: A bill of revivor to recover £5500 lent to Edmund Wyndham, of Kentsford, Somerset, deceased, on the security of a mortgage: property in Kentisbeare, Devon; Payhembury, Devon; Clyst Hydon, Devon; Catchanger, Fifehead, Somerset; Isle Abbotts, Somerset; Talaton, Devon; Chalcott, Stogursey, Somerset; Edston Farm, Stogursey, Somerset and Cockand, Stogursey, Somerset. Document type: bill, answer. 1697-1698
C 6/391/76 Short title: Colston v Earl of Westmorland. Plaintiffs: Edward Colston esq, Papworth Gidney merchant, of London, Mary Gidney his wife, George Gooday stationer, of London, Stafford Fairbourne gent and Dorothy Fairbourne his wife. Defendants: Gregory Hascard clerk, Dean of Windsor, Edward Austin esq, of Bexley, Kent, Rachel Fane Dowager Countess of Westmorland, guardian and Vere Fane Earl of Westmorland infant. Subject: Settlement of the will of Vere Fane Earl of Westmorland, deceased and the payment of his creditors, the plaintiffs, to whom was owed £12000 on mortgages and bonds: property in Baker Farm, Mereworth, Kent. Document type: bill, two answers, certificate. 1695
<u>PROB</u>certificate. 1695
<u>PROB</u> +
|
| Transcription
|
all the said goods and Merchandizes belong … all the said goods and Merchandizes belonging to the said Humphrey<br />
and Mathias Adington, were and are utterly lost to them, without<br />
any recompence or satisfaction for the same, And further hee<br />
cannot Answer:/:
Repeated before doctor Godolphin:
Joseph Bankes [SIGNATURE, RH SIDE]
*******************************
The 18th of January 1657.
'''Rp. 2.'''
'''Edward Colston''' of Allhallowes the Wall<br />
London Merchant, aged 21: yeeres or thereabouts<br />
sworne and Examined as aforesayd./.
To the first, second, and third Interrogatories, hee saith that hee<br />
very well knoweth the Interrate Robert Bankes, who was<br />
Master of the Interrate ship the ''Valentine'' of London, at such<br />
time as shee was last in the River of Thames, And<br />
saith that shee was then directly bound from this Port<br />
to Porto in Portugall, And that the Interrtae humphrey<br />
Aldington, and Mathias Aldington, did before her departure<br />
from this Port, on the said Intended Voyage, lade, or cause<br />
to be laden aboard the said ship, for their owne proper<br />
Accounts and Adventure, a good quantity of goods and<br />
Merchandizes, namely the said Humphrey, one bale<br />
Containeing thirty peeces of Perpetuanas<br />
and one Hatt and a small box, both Containeing forty two dozed<br />
of mens; and twenty nine dozen of womens, and Childrens<br />
woosted stockings, All which Merchandizes, together with the Charges<br />
of dying, Packing, and shipping, really and truely<br />
Cost the said Humphrey 200: ''li'' at the least; And saith there was laden, or<br />
caused to be laden aboard the said ship by the said<br />
Mathias Aldington, 6: Bales, containeing ffifty peeces<br />
of Perpetuana's, and twenty peeces of Longe Bocking Bayes<br />
which Six Bales, together with their Charges in Shipping and<br />
otherwise, really cost the said Mathias: 300: ''li'' and upwards<br />
all whoch hee knoweth to be true, living with the<br />
said Humphrey, And Mathoas Aldington, and Perusing<br />
their bookes of Accompts, and factories, wherein the said<br />
goods were entred, And further saith that the said goods<br />
were to be transported in the said ship, from this Port of<br />
London, to Porto aforesaid, for the onely proper use and accounts<br />
of them the said Humphrey, and Mathias, And further hee cannotphrey, and Mathias, And further hee cannot +
|
