First transcribed
|
24 November 2012 +
|
First transcriber
|
JIll Wilcox +
|
Folio
|
441 +
|
Parent volume
|
HCA 13/71 +
|
Side
|
Recto +
|
Status
|
Uploaded image; transcribed on 24/11/2012 +
|
Transcription
|
To the third hee saith hee sawe the shipp … To the third hee saith hee sawe the shipp Interrogate last on satterday last<br />
at Wivenell aforesayd And further to this Interrogatorie hee cannot depose
To the 4th hee cannot answere./
To the 5th hee saith hee beleeveth that at the tyme off the seizure of the ''Edward''<br />
''and John'' English goods were esteemed good prize to the Spaniards and<br />
fflandrians And further saving his foregoeing deposition hee cannot<br />
depose/
To the last hee saith it concerneth him not to answere thereto for that hee hath<br />
not deposed touching the matter interrogate, nor ian hee answere anything thereto
Repeated before doctor Godolphin/
The marke of the sayd<br />
Paule '''O''' Clements. [SIGNATURE, RH SIDE]
************************************
The 13th of december 1656/
Warner against the ''Alexander'' and against Howe<br />
Budd smith
Examined upon an allegation given in on<br />
the behalfe of the sayd Warner./
'''9'''
'''John White''' of London Merchant aged forty<br />
one yeares or thereabouts sworne and examined saith<br />
and deposeth as followeth videlicet/
To the fifth article of the sayd allegation hee saith that<br />
the arlate Alexander howe during all the moneth of September 1653<br />
was Commonly accompted a part Owner of the shipp the ''Alexander''<br />
and hee beleeveth him soe to bee for that the sayd Alexander howe within<br />
the tyme aforesayd did confesse and acknowledge to this deponent that<br />
hee was then a part owner of the sayd shipp And further hee cannot depose/
To the 6th article of the sayd allegation hee saith and deposeth that hee this<br />
deponent is the arlate John White and that after the returne of the shipp<br />
''Alexander'' into England there happening some differences betweene the<br />
arlate John Marston and Armiger Warner the same differences were referred<br />
to the determination of him this deponent and the arlate Alexander howe<br />
And hee saith that upon the sayd reference hee this deponent and the sayd<br />
Alexander howe did publish and make the award or second schedule in this<br />
article mentioned now shewed unto and perused by him this deponent at the<br />
tyme of this his examination and did therein awarde and decree in all<br />
things as in the sayd awarde is declared and saith that the sayd<br />
awarde was and is subscribed by this deponent and the sayd Alexander<br />
Howe and that hee very well knoweth that these names or words John<br />
White and Alexander howe at the foote of the awarde arlate subscribed<br />
and his And the sayd Alexander howes owne handwriting, and that the<br />
sayd award was sealed published and delivered by this deponent and the sayd<br />
Alexander howe according as in the same awarde is expressed and<br />
that all things were soe had and done as in the sayd Award is conteyned<br />
and that the contents of the sayd Award are true, And further hee cannot depose
To the rest of the articles of the sayd allegation hee is not examined<br />
by direction of the producent Warner/
To the Interrogatorries/ [CENTRE HEADING]
To the Interrogatorries/ [CENTRE HEADING] +
|
Transcription image
|
[[File:P1140049.JPG|thumbnail|800px|none|link=Special:TranscriptionInterface/P1140049.JPG|[[:HCA 13/71|HCA 13/71]] f.441r: Right click on image for full size image in separate window +
|
Has queryThis property is a special property in this wiki.
|
HCA 13/71 f.441r Annotate +
, HCA 13/71 f.441r Annotate +
, HCA 13/71 f.441r Annotate +
, HCA 13/71 f.441r Annotate +
, HCA 13/71 f.441r Annotate +
, HCA 13/71 f.441r Annotate +
, HCA 13/71 f.441r Annotate +
|
Categories |
Pages +
|
Modification dateThis property is a special property in this wiki.
|
2 November 2016 22:26:39 +
|