| Transcription
|
To the 8th hee saith, That in case the sai … To the 8th hee saith, That in case the said shipp had not bin sayed engaged by<br />
contract as aforesaid and [XXXX] in expectation of her lading by them the said Jagoe and said<br />
Bowtill, shee might very well have had another freight or imployment as<br />
advantagious and beneficiall or more than the voiage for which they had contracted<br />
with him the said Marriott which hee this deponent knoweth, for that at Limrick in Ireland this<br />
deponent then being, a frieght was offered her from thence to Kingsale in Ireland<br />
and so to Minihead or Bristoll in England and thereto Waterford And<br />
further cannot depose./:
To the 9th hee saith, That the said Nathaniel Marriott by reason of the stayeing of the only said (shipp<br />
and not peformance of Covenants as aforesaid by the said Jagoe and Bowtill hath<br />
in this deponents judgement and according to his Conscience upon his oath suffered<br />
dammage to the valew of three hundred pounds and upwards, shee having beeing in<br />
a Capacity to have gained as much in the time of her said detention, and since<br />
of which shee hath bin hindred by the meanes aforesaid, having since performed onely<br />
one Voiage from dartmouth to Newhaven, in ffrance wherein shee onely earned<br />
30 ''li'' sterling or thereabouts, being forced to take that freight purposely to be freed<br />
from the debt and engagements shee had contracted at dartmouth by meanes aforesaid<br />
and she said Nathaniel Marriot being absent in Ireland, and thereby not in a<br />
readnesse to supply her wants. The premisses hee deposeth upon grounds of knowledge<br />
as aforesaid being well acquainted with the occurrences of and concerning the said<br />
shipp both before aged since the Contract predeposed./
To the 10th hee saith, That the said Jagoe hath been required both by the deponent<br />
and the said Roger hall and the said Bowtill by this deponent to make payment<br />
and give satisfaction for and in the premises according to the said Contract, which they<br />
have refused and delayed and still refuse and delay to doe, And further<br />
referreth himselfe to the Acts and proceedings of this Court./
To the 11th hee saith the said Thomas Jagoes was and is a Merchant inhabitant at<br />
dartmouth aforesaid, and the said William Bowtill, here at London, they being Englishmen<br />
and subjects of this Commonwealth./
To the last hee saith his foregoeing deposition is true./
Repeated before Doctor Godolphin:/
Thomas Marryott [SIGNATURE, RH SIDE]
********************************
The third of May 1656 [CENTRE HEADING]
Complaine against Brandling}
Examined upon the foresaid allegation given in<br />
on the behalfe of the said Brandling and<br />
Company
'''Rp. 2us'''
'''Brandl.'''
'''Samuel Warner''' of Ipswich shipwright aged 37<br />
years or thereabouts sworne and examined.
To the first and third article of the said allegation hee saith and deposeth<br />
that immediately before the lading of the hemp with the shipp the<br />
''Primrose'' arlate brought to London the voyage wherein (in her returne<br />
from London) shee met with the stormes in question, namely about a<br />
moneth before such her returne from London, hee this deponent being<br />
a shipwright was by his precontest William Marsh the master of the<br />
said shipp imployed to worke, and with one Thomas Page did worke<br />
upon her at Ipswich to calke and fitt her for that voyage, wherein<br />
hee saith they used all care and dilegence they being called upon and<br />
administered to doe the worke well and make her very tight and staunch<br />
because shee was to carry hemp for London, And saith that this deponent<br />
andd saith that this deponent<br />
and +
|
