HCA 13/71 f.203v Annotate
Volume | HCA 13/71 |
---|---|
Folio | 203 |
Side | Verso |
← Previous Page | |
Status | |
Uploaded image; transcribed on 01/11/2012 | |
Note | |
IMAGE: P1130564.JPG | |
First transcriber | |
Colin Greenstreet | |
First transcribed | |
2012/11/01 | |
Editorial history | |
Edited on 14/12/2013 by Colin Greenstreet |
Expand this area to see details of page purpose, how to register, how to add footnotes, and useful links.
Image
Transcription
To the Interrogatories/ [CENTRE HEADING]
To the first hee saith hee cometh to testifie the truth of his knowledge in
the cause on behalfe of the producent being required soe to doe by the foresayd
Captaine Bowden and hath receaved nothing for his paines nor is concerned
in the linnens in question And otherwise negatively/
To the 2 hee cannot depose/
To the 3 saving his foregoeing deposition hee cannot answere/
To the 4th hee cannot depose./
To the 5th hee cannot depose/
To the last soe farr as to these words (or did use words to that or the like
effect) hee cannot answere and knoweth nothing thereof And to the rest
of the Interrogatorie hee answereth negatively./
John Bennetland [SIGNATURE, RH SIDE]
*****************************
The same day
Examined on the sayd allegation
Rp. 4
Robert de Luna of London Merchant aged 32 yeares
or thereabouts a wittnes sworne and examined saith and
deposeth as followeth videlicet./
To the 6th article of the sayd allegation and the schedule therein mentioned
hee saith hee hath knowne the arlate Trenchpaine for about these
fowerteene yeares last past and hath receaved divers letters letters from
him and had correspondence with him in way of merchandizing and
thereby is well acquainted with his hand writeing, and having
perused the schedule in the sayd article mentioned hee saith by virtue
of his oath that hee is persuaded in his conscience and verily beleeveth
the same is all of it the sayd Trenchpaines owne hand writing And
further to this article hee cannot depose./
To the rest hee is not examined by direction of the producents
proctor
To the Interrogatories./ [CENTRE HEADING]
To the first Interrogatorie hee saith hee cometh to testifie the
truth of his knowledge being required soe to doe (as hee remembreth
by one Mr Thomas Papillion a merchant on behalfe of the producent
and hath receaved nothing for his testimony nor expecteth any thing, nor
is concerned in the linnens in question And otherwise negatively
To the 2 hee cannot depose./
To the 3 hee cannot depose/
To the 4th hee cannot depose/
To the 5th hee saith hee hath heard that after the ladeing of the
goods in question on board the Morlaix Merchant the Interrogate
Trenchpaine fayled in his Estate And further to this Interrogatorie hee
cannot depose./
To the last soe farr as to these words (or did use words to that or the like effect)
hee cannot depose knowing nothing thereof And to the rest of the Interrogatorie hee
answereth negatively./
Repeated in Court before both Judges./
Robert DeLuna [SIGNATURE, RH SIDE]
Topics
People
Robert de Luna
Sources
Primary sources
TNA
Chancery
C 5/111/24 Short title: Hicks v Bullock. Plaintiffs: Francis Hicks. Defendants: Robert Bullock, and others. Subject: personal estate of the deceased Robert De Luna, London. Document type: bill, two answers. 1694
C 5/525/20 Short title: Molyne v De Luna. Plaintiffs: Abraham Molyne. Defendants: Robert de Luna and Elizabeth de Luna his wife. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: Bill, two answers. 1673
C 6/129/239 Short title: Winstanley v Burrell. Plaintiffs: Edward Winstanley. Defendants: Samuel Burrell, John Limbrey, Richard Love, Robert Deluna and Elizabeth Deluna his wife. Subject: property in Wisbech, Cambridgeshire. Document type: three answers, schedule.
C 10/494/85 De Luna v. Lamplugh: Middx. 1676
C 22/724/35 Wingfeild v. De Luna. 01 January 1558 - 31 December 1714
PROB
PROB 11/390/105 Will of Robert De Luna, Merchant of Cheshunt, Hertfordshire. 31 January 1688
PROB 11/420/29 Will of Elizabeth De Luna, Widow of Edmonton, Middlesex. 03 May 1694