Difference between revisions of "HCA 13/70 f.423r Annotate"

Revision as of 14:45, August 14, 2014

Image

HCA 13/70 f.423r: Right click on image for full size image in separate window

Transcription

To the Crosse Interogatories:- [CENTRE HEADING]

[GUTTER ?dt.] Rowe

To the first negatively to every part thereof:-/

To the second hee saith hee hath knowne the said shipp the Golden
falcon ever since her Originall building as aforesaid, And saith shee
was built at Serdam upon the proper charges and for the sole Accompt of the
said daniel Thyson the Claymer and by his order and direction as is
predeposed. And further referreth himself to his precedent deposition./.

To the third hee saith, the said daniel Thysson paid to this rendent
163. pouds flemish for the said shipps first sute of sailes, but hat
this rendent was not present at the payment of any moneys for the said shipps
hull or other tackle and apparrell, saying hee this rendent hath observed
in the said producents bookes of accompts that the said shipp did cost
the said producent two thousand and two hundred pounds flemish, or
thereabouts being in English money about thirteene hundred pounds
sterling. And further otherwise then negatively cannot depose;-/

To the fourth hee answereth, That the said shipp upon her last outwards
vpiage was fitted and furnished to sea by this rendent at the charges and
by the order of the said daniel Thyson his this rendents brother. And
otherwise negatively/:-

To the fifth hee saith, the interrate Anthony Cornelison was and
continued Master of the said shipp ever since her firsy originall
building till the time of her seizure in the Voiage in question, and was
constituted Master of her by the said producent, Amd otherwise
cannot depose:-/

To the 6th hee saith the said shipp begann her last outwards voiage
from Middleburgh in Zeeland in Aprill 1652 bound for Bayon
from whence shee proceeded to mallega in Spaine, and in her
returne thence bound for Zeeland was seized as aforesaid And
otherwise saving his foregoeing deposition hee cannot depose:-/

To the 7th hee referreth himselfe to his foregoeing deposition saving hee was
not present at the buying of the hoodsin Controversie, but saith That
the said goods were laden aboard the said shipp by the said factors as
aforesaid as being the [?provenue] of corne and deales and
spiceries formerly sent by the said producent and upon his accompt to
the said factors as also for and in consideration of the said shipps freight
acquired in her said Voiage from Bayonne to Mallega, as this rendent
is well assured both by his constant employment as Agent to and
for the said producent, as by the correspondence which hee hath
with, and the letters of advice and Invoyce or aaccompt of the said
goods which hee received from the said factors and thereby is fully
confirmed in the trueth of the proprietie by him predeposed. And
further cannot depose:-/

To the 8th hee saith, hee cannot depose otherwise then as hee
hath predeposed, saving hee beleeveth the said factors who laded the
said goods to bee Brabanters And otherwise negatively:-/