Thomas Bomer

From MarineLives
Jump to: navigation, search



Thomas Bomer
Person Thomas Bomer
Title
First name Thomas
Middle name(s)
Last name Bomer
Suffix
Spouse of
Widow of
Occupation Mariner
Secondary shorebased occupation
Mariner occupation Foremastman, One of the Company
Associated with ship(s) Love (Master: Richard Thompson)
Training Not apprentice
Is apprentice of
Was apprentice of
Had apprentice(s)
Citizen Unknown
Literacy Marke
Has opening text Thomas Bomer
Has signoff text TB
Signoff image (Invalid transcription image)
Language skills English language
Has interpreter
Birth street
Birth parish
Birth town
Birth county
Birth province
Birth country
Res street
Res parish Saint Catherines near the Tower
Res town London
Res county
Res province
Res country England
Birth year 1630
Marriage year
Death year
Probate date
First deposition age 25
Primary sources
Act book start page(s)
Personal answer start page(s)
Allegation start page(s)
Interrogatories page(s)
Deposition start page(s) HCA 13/70 f.440r Annotate
Chancery start page(s)
Letter start page(s)
Miscellaneous start page(s)
Act book date(s)
Personal answer date(s)
Allegation date(s)
Interrogatories date(s)
Deposition date(s) Jul 10 1655
How complete is this biography?
Has infobox completed Yes
Has synthesis completed No
Has HCA evidence completed No
Has source comment completed No
Ship classification
Type of ship Merchant ship
Silver Ship litigation in 1650s
Role in Silver Ship litigation None


Biographical synthesis

Thomas Bomer (b. ca. 1630; d. ?). Mariner.

One of the ship the Love now called the Mary (Master: Richard Thompson)

"Was one of the company and a foremast man and on board of the shipp or vessell arlate".[1]

Resident in 1655 in the parish of Saint Catherines near the Tower.

Evidence from High Court of Admiralty

Twenty-five year old Thomas Bomer deposed on July 10th 1655 in the High Court of Admiralty. He was examined on an allegation dated July 6th 1655 on behalf of Richard Thompson and company in the cause "Cooke and Company and Bludworth and Company against Richard Thompson and company".[2]

Comment on sources

  1. HCA 13/70 f.440r
  2. HCA 13/70 f.440r