HCA 13/71 f.606r Annotate

From MarineLives
Jump to: navigation, search
[Expand]

Expand this area to see details of page purpose, how to register, how to add footnotes, and useful links.

Image

HCA 13/71 f.606r: Right click on image for full size image in separate window

Transcription

to direct him, where Oporto lay And hee alsoe in like manner confessed and sayd that if
any of the sayd boates would have come to him to direct him hee would that night
have adventured to come to Anchor neere the Barr of Oport And further saving
his foregoeing deposition hee cannot answer/

To the 4th hee is noe Seaman but hath used the sea these twenty yeares and
hath some Judgment in the art of Navigation though hee doe not practize the same,
And saith hee never knew the Interrogate Jeggles before the voyage in question
and beleeveth him to bee an able man although hee were ignorant of
that part of the Coast of Portugall where Oport stands. And further
hee cannot answere/

To the 5th and sixth saving his foregoing deposition hee cannot more fully
answer to these Interrogatories./

To the 7th hee saith that for all the tyme hee was on board the sayd shipp (which tyme
will appeare by his foregoeing deposition) there was noe scarcity of victualls
in the sayd shipp and what was afterwards by this rendent knoweth not for that
hee stayed at Barbadoes ˹from his first coming thither˺ and went not with the sayd shipp to any place afterwards./

Repeated before doctor Godolphin/

Edward Cowse [SIGNATURE, RH SIDE]

******************************

The first day of July 1657

Browning and Company Owners of the}
Plaine dealeing against William Bulkley: Smith}
Suckley}

Examined on an allegation given in on the behalfe
of the sayd Bulkley./

Rp. E[?f]: jus.

Thomas Baudes of London Merchant aged thirty
yeares or thereabouts a wittnesse sworne and examined
saith and deposeth as followth videlicet./

To the sixth article of the sayd allegation hee saith hee this deponent in the
yeare one thousand sixe hundred fiftie five during all the
monethes therein concurring and untill March 1656 did reside sometymes at
Veales and sometymes at Mallega in Spaine as an Agent or ffactor to
severall English Merchants who traded then to those parts And thereby
knoweth that severall English shipps did from the tenth of September 1655
(which was the first day of the Imbargo made of English merchants estates
in Spaine by reason of the difference then happening betwixt England
and Spaine) untill the sayd Monday of March 1656 come to Mallega
and laye without command of the Castle there and sent to the factors
with whom they were appointed to negotiate, and did notwithstanding the
sayd difference unlade divers goods there which they brought from England
and receaved there after ladeing of fruite and wines to the great benefitt and
advantage of their employers And hee this deponent did after the sayd
difference happened receave from on board the John and Concord, and
the

Topics

People


Thomas Baudes [alt. ?Bawdes]

Sources

Primary sources


TNA

Chancery

C 5/448/125 Short title: Bawdes v Cratey. Plaintiffs: Thomas Bawdes. Defendants: Andrew Cratey. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: Bill, answer. 1677

C 6/52/7 Short title: Bawds v Linn. Plaintiffs: Thomas Bawds. Defendants: Jacob Linn and Anne Browneing widow. Subject: money matters relating to a ship called the James, Middlesex. Document type: bill, two answers, four schedules. 1672

C 6/148/12 Short title: Baker v Browning. Plaintiffs: Richard Baker. Defendants: John Browning, Thomas Bawds, Thomas Clutterbooke and Maurice Bawds. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, three answers. 1660

C 10/128/18 Bawdes v. Browning. 1674

PROB