Difference between revisions of "HCA 13/70 f.650r Annotate"

Revision as of 21:59, April 19, 2016

Image

HCA 13/70 f.650r: Right click on image for full size image in separate window

Transcription

The seaventh of November 1655 [CENTRE HEADING]

The claime of hendrick Matthias of}
Amsterdam for his goods in the hare in the}
ffeild, John kein Master. Budd. ffrancklin.}

Examined upon an allegation given
in on the behalfe of the said
Matthias the 18th of July 1655.

fra dt.

George Crooke Secretary of his Excellencie the Lord
Embassador of the States of the United Netherlands
aged 25 yeares or thereabouts, sworne and examined.

To the 8th article of the said allegation upon which alone hee is by direction of
the partie producent examined hee saith and deposeth that hee well
knoweth the producent hendrick Matthias and hath soe donne for theise
five yeares last past or thereabouts, and saith hee the said hendrick hath
bin for all the said time and is a Burger,
freeman and Inhabitant of Amsterdam and a subiect of the Lords the
States of the United Netherlands and for such commonly accompted and
reputed, and maried there the daughter of one Mr Timmerman of
Amsterdam sugar baker, and dwelt with his wife and familie
when this deponent was last at Amsterdam (which was about two yeares
since) on the [?Streisers] gracht in Amsterdam, and for a free
Burgher and Inhabitant of Amsterdam and a subiect of the said Lords
the States hee the said hendrick Matthias was and is commonly
accompted and reputed: Besides this deponent hath seene an attestation
from the Magistrates of Amsterdam, testifying such burgershipp and
subiection of the said Matthias, who as this deponent hath often heard
hath dwelt in Amsterdam about tenn or twelve yeares last. And
otherwise hee cannot depose, saving that hee is of
acquaintance with the said hendrick, and thereby the better able
to depose the premisses, this deponent being a native of Amsterdam
and living longe there.

To the Interrogatories. [CENTRE HEADING]

To the first hee saith hee lived about two yeares last in England
and before that a yeare in the Hague, and before that hee
travailed two yeares in ffrance, Italy and high Germany, and before that in
holland where hee was borne. And otherwise negatively.

To the second hee saith hee the said hendrick Matthias is commonly reputed
a native of hamborowe, and otherwise hee referreth himselfe to his foregoeing
deposition.

To the third, fourth, 5. 6. and 7th hee cannot answer, not being in the voyage
nor knowing ought thereof

To the 8th hee hath not soe deposed.

To the 9th negatively.

To the 10th and 11th hee cannot depose.

To the 12th hee saith hee hath understood by letters that the goods claimed in this
cause by the said hendrick Matthias are assured at Amsterdam by one Mr
hasselaer, who is a dutchman and a subiect of the said Lords the States

To the 13th and 14th hee cannot answer saving as aforesaid.

To the 15th hee hath not soe deposed

To

Topics

People

Timmermann

"19. Op de Prinsengracht bij de Leliegracht, ten zuiden van het Huiszittenhuis, bevond zich een raffinaderij, die in 1643 voltimmerd was en in 1662 door GEORG TIMMERMAN, advocaat, PAUL TIMMERMAN, JOHANNA VAN ZELLER, weduwe PAULUS TIMMERMAN, en anderen allen meerderjarige erfgenamen van PAULUS TIMMERMAN, verkocht werd aan HENRICO MATTHIAS. Deze raffinadrij..."^[1]

1. ↑ J.J. Reesse, De suikerhandel van Amsterdam, van het begin der 17de eeuuw tot 1813 (XXXX, 1908), p.125
2. ↑ J.J. Reesse, De suikerhandel van Amsterdam, van het begin der 17de eeuuw tot 1813 (XXXX, 1908), p.cxlii