Difference between revisions of "HCA 13/70 f.435r Annotate"

From MarineLives
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 13: Line 13:
 
|Transcription=The 2nd of July 1655
 
|Transcription=The 2nd of July 1655
  
−
The clayme of Richard Le Bas for the ''Dolphin'' alias ''fortune''. Suckley Budd examined upon the said allegation.
+
The clayme of Richard le Bas for the ''Dolphin''
 +
alias ''fortune''. Suckley Budd
 +
examined upon the said allegation.
  
 
D. T. Holding? 4us
 
D. T. Holding? 4us
  
−
James Snowden of Wapping in the parish of Stepney in the countie of Middlesex, Marriner: aged 40 years or thereabouts a wittnesse sworne and examined saith and deposeth as followeth videlicet:
+
James Snowden of Wapping in the parish
 +
of Stepney in the countie of Middlesex, Marriner
 +
aged 40 years or thereabouts a wittnesse sworne and
 +
examined saith and deposeth as followeth videlicet
  
−
To the first (and 2nd) Article of the said Allegation he saith and deposeth, That hee this Deponent hath knowne the shipp the ''Dolphin'' alias the ''ffortune'' or ''hopewell?'' of Sunderland ever since about 5 or 6 yeares since, at which time shee belonged to the port of Sunderland, and was then under the Command of one Sampson Nicholson, who in or about the moneth of November 1653 lawfully? sold and disposed of the said wessell to the arlate Richard Le Bas and Peter Knight Merchants living here in London, who constituted one Robbins to be Master and Commander of her for their use and accompte and so much the said Robbins did sewall times intimate say and declare her their Deponent both here at London and in ffrance, and that the Said Le Bas and Knight were the true and lawfull Owners of the Same or to that effect as also by the declaration of the Said Richard Le Bas, who shortly after the buying of the Said wessel desired this deponent to take the Care and Conduct of her upon him, which this Deponent then refused as being then the provider? of another wessel, And saith That shortly after this Deponent sailed in Command with the said wessel (the Said Robbins Master) towards the Coast of ffrance, and afterwards saw her at Caen, the said Robbins then Being dispossessed of her by order of her said Owner at (…?) there generally? reported the said wessel then being under the Command of a fflemish Skipp, But what passed at Caen comprising the sale of ¾ parts of the said shipp, as is alleadged this Deponent saith he doeth not know, nor is at all acquainted with any such transaction. And further hee cannot depose.
+
To the first (and 2nd) Article of the said Allegation he saith and deposeth, That hee this
 +
deponent hath knowne the shipp the ''Dolphin'' alias the ''ffortune'' or ''hopewell?'' of
 +
Sunderland ever since about 5 or 6 yeares since, at which time shee belonged
 +
to the port of Sunderland, and was then under the Command of one Sampson
 +
Nicholson, who in or about the moneth of November 1653 lawfully?
 +
sold and disposed of the said wessell to the arlate Richard le Bas and
 +
Peter Knight Merchants living here in London, who constituted one Robbins
 +
to be Master and Commander of her for their use and accompte and so
 +
much the said Robbins did sewall times intimate say and declare her their
 +
Deponent both here at London and in ffrance, and that the Said le Bas and Knight were
 +
the true and lawfull Owners of the Same or to that effect as also by the
 +
declaration of the Said Richard le Bas, who shortly after the buying
 +
of the Said wessel desired this deponent to take the Care and Conduct of
 +
her upon him, which this deponent then refused as being then the provider? of
 +
another wessel, And saith That shortly after this deponent sailed in
 +
Command with the said wessel (the Said Robbins Master) towards the Coast
 +
of ffrance, and afterwards saw her at Caen, the said Robbins then
 +
Being dispossessed of her by order of her said Owner at ne?? there
 +
generally? reported the said wessel then being under the Command
 +
of a fflemish Skipp, But what passed at Caen comprising the sale
 +
of ¾ parts of the said shipp, as is alleadged this deponent saith he doeth
 +
not know, nor is at all acquainted with any such transaction.
 +
And further hee cannot depose
  
−
To the third article and to the schedule our bill of sale annexed hee Saith hee knoweth nothing thereof otherwise or further than hee hath now predeposed.
+
To the third article and to the schedule our bill of sale annexed hee
 +
Saith hee knoweth nothing thereof otherwise or further than hee
 +
hath now predeposed
  
−
To the 4th hee Saith, hee this Deponent hath knowne the arlate Richard Le Bas for about 3 yeares last past, during which time the said Le Bas hath lived in this City of this Deponent knowledge and for sewall yeares before according to common report, such hath been and is esteemed a Merchant of this Citie and a subject of this Commonwealth and in that quality to pay all dues and dueties required of him, and saith the said Le Bas Did of this Deponent observation? fitt and furnish out the said ship in Contoversie to sea upon the woiage wherein shee went out after hee had first so bought her, which he knoweth for the reasons predeposed, and for that hee this Deponent hath been for all that time well acquainted with the said Richard Le Bas, and hath sewall times served him both in transporting goods from heure into ffrance, and from ffrance hither
+
To the 4th hee Saith, hee this deponent hath knowne the arlate Richard le
 +
Bas for about 3 yeares last past, during which time the said
 +
le Bas hath lived in this City of this deponent knowledge and for sewall
 +
yeares before according to common report, such hath been and is
 +
esteemed a Merchant of this Citie and a subject of this Commonwealth
 +
and in that quality to pay all dues and dueties required of him, and saith
 +
the said le Bas did of this deponent observation? fitt and furnish out the said
 +
shipp in Contoversie to sea upon the woiage wherein shee went out after hee
 +
had first so bought her, which he knoweth for the reasons predeposed, and for
 +
that hee this deponent hath been for all that time well acquainted with the
 +
said Richard le Bas, and hath sewall times served him both in
 +
transporting goods from heure into ffrance, and from ffrance hither
  
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 12:04, November 2, 2014

Volume HCA 13/70
Folio 435
Side Recto
← Previous Page

Status
Languages
Note
none
First transcriber
Rachel Carter
First transcribed
unknown
Editorial history
Created 16/08/14, by CSG

Expand this area to see details of page purpose, how to register, how to add footnotes, and useful links.



Purpose

This page is for the annotation of HCA 13/70 f.435r.

Annotations can be viewed by everyone on a read-only basis.

For more information on MarineLives and the MarineLives Annotation Project read our Shipping News blog entries:

Annotating Marine Lives, May 1st 2013
Adding value to primary documents, May 8th 2013
Witnesses in Court, 1657-1658 (May 9th, 2013)



Registration to annotate documents

Registration is required to contribute annotations to this page and to other pages in the wiki.

You can register using the following Form, and we will issue you with a UserName and Password for the wiki.



Text formatting

The MarineLives transcription platform is built on MediaWiki, which uses wiki markup to format text. For a guide showing how to produce italics, bold, escaped text and headings, see the MediaWiki page on formatting; there are also guides for internal and external links, image embedding, tables, and more on lists.



Adding footnotes

  • Go into edit mode
  • Insert immediately after the sentence or phrase you wish to annotate the following macro:<ref>This is the footnote text</ref>
  • Replace 'This is the footnote text' with the footnote you wish to add, using the format: first name, surname, title, (place of publication, date of publication), page or folio number
  • Save the page


For more information and advanced formatting, including how to add and format links within the footnote, see the Wikipedia help on footnotes. This uses the same markup formatting.

Example footnote template:

  • ''HCA 13/XX f.XXXX Case: XXXX; Deposition: XXXX; Date: XXXX. Transcribed by XXXX''<ref>[http://XXXXX Electronic link to a digital source]</ref>



Suggested links

Annotate HCA 13/64 Volume Page
Annotate HCA 13/65 Volume Page
Annotate HCA 13/68 Volume Page
Annotate HCA 13/69 Volume Page
Annotate HCA 13/70 Volume Page
Annotate HCA 13/71 Volume Page
Annotate HCA 13/72 Volume Page
Annotate HCA 13/73 Volume Page
Annotate HCA 13/74 Volume Page
Marine Lives Tools

Image

HCA 13/70 f.435r: Right click on image for full size image in separate window

Transcription

The 2nd of July 1655

The clayme of Richard le Bas for the Dolphin
alias fortune. Suckley Budd
examined upon the said allegation.

D. T. Holding? 4us

James Snowden of Wapping in the parish
of Stepney in the countie of Middlesex, Marriner
aged 40 years or thereabouts a wittnesse sworne and
examined saith and deposeth as followeth videlicet

To the first (and 2nd) Article of the said Allegation he saith and deposeth, That hee this
deponent hath knowne the shipp the Dolphin alias the ffortune or hopewell? of
Sunderland ever since about 5 or 6 yeares since, at which time shee belonged
to the port of Sunderland, and was then under the Command of one Sampson
Nicholson, who in or about the moneth of November 1653 lawfully?
sold and disposed of the said wessell to the arlate Richard le Bas and
Peter Knight Merchants living here in London, who constituted one Robbins
to be Master and Commander of her for their use and accompte and so
much the said Robbins did sewall times intimate say and declare her their
Deponent both here at London and in ffrance, and that the Said le Bas and Knight were
the true and lawfull Owners of the Same or to that effect as also by the
declaration of the Said Richard le Bas, who shortly after the buying
of the Said wessel desired this deponent to take the Care and Conduct of
her upon him, which this deponent then refused as being then the provider? of
another wessel, And saith That shortly after this deponent sailed in
Command with the said wessel (the Said Robbins Master) towards the Coast
of ffrance, and afterwards saw her at Caen, the said Robbins then
Being dispossessed of her by order of her said Owner at ne?? there
generally? reported the said wessel then being under the Command
of a fflemish Skipp, But what passed at Caen comprising the sale
of ¾ parts of the said shipp, as is alleadged this deponent saith he doeth
not know, nor is at all acquainted with any such transaction.
And further hee cannot depose

To the third article and to the schedule our bill of sale annexed hee
Saith hee knoweth nothing thereof otherwise or further than hee
hath now predeposed

To the 4th hee Saith, hee this deponent hath knowne the arlate Richard le
Bas for about 3 yeares last past, during which time the said
le Bas hath lived in this City of this deponent knowledge and for sewall
yeares before according to common report, such hath been and is
esteemed a Merchant of this Citie and a subject of this Commonwealth
and in that quality to pay all dues and dueties required of him, and saith
the said le Bas did of this deponent observation? fitt and furnish out the said
shipp in Contoversie to sea upon the woiage wherein shee went out after hee
had first so bought her, which he knoweth for the reasons predeposed, and for
that hee this deponent hath been for all that time well acquainted with the
said Richard le Bas, and hath sewall times served him both in
transporting goods from heure into ffrance, and from ffrance hither

Retrieved from ‘http://www.marinelives.org/index.php?title=HCA_13/70_f.435r_Annotate&oldid=27480’