MRP: Thomas Noell will
Thomas Noell will
PROB 11/387 Foot 45-89 Will of Thomas Noell, Gentleman of Fulham, Middlesex 28 May 1687
Editorial history
12/12/11, CSG: Created page & posted completed transcription to wiki
Contents
Abstract & context
Thomas Noell wrote his will in 1668, but it was not proved until 1687. At the time of writing his will, his father's former ?servant and ?partner, the scrivener Thomas massam, was still alive.
[Martha Noell, the widow of Thomas Noell, had remarried to John Ballard by the time that administration of her deceased husband's will was granted to her]
Suggested links
See Martin Noel will
See Dame Elizabeth Noell will
See Thomas Massam will
To do
Transcription
IN THE NAME OF GOD AMEN the twenty eighth day of Januray in the yeare of our Lord God one thousand six hundred sixty and eight and in the twentyeth yeare of our Soveraigne Lord Charles the second by the greace of God of England Scotland ffrance and IrelandKing Defender of the faith x:r I Thomas Noell of Hamersmith in the parish of ffulham in the County of Middy gent, being in good health of body and of sound and perfect mind and memory praise be therefore given to Allmighty God but considering the frailty and uncertainty of this mortall life and that I am now intended by the blessing of God to make a voiage into Ireland and the danger of the saes, doe therefore make and declare this my last Will and Testament in manner and forme followinge That is to say
FIRST and principally I comend my Soule into the hands of Allmighty God my most mercifull ffather, assuredly trusting and believeing that through his mercy and the death and meritts of Jesus Christ my onely Lord and Saviour I shall have full and ffree remission and pardon of all my sinnes and after this life aided be made partaker of those everlasting joyes which are prepared for the Saints in the Kingdome of Heaven And my body I comitt to the Earth whereof it was framed to be decently buried,
And touching such goods Chattells moneys Debts and Estate whatsoeveras it hath pleased to blesse me with all I dispose thereof as followeth
FFIRST I give and bequeath to my loveing ffriend Charles Modyford of London and Merchant and Thomas Massam[1] of London Cittizen and Scrivener each of them the summe of twenty pounds of good and lawfull money of England and all the rest residue and remainder of my goods Chattells moneys Debts and estate whatsoever I doe give and bequeath unto my loveing wife Martha Noell[2] whome I doe hereby make ordaine and appoint sole Executrix of this my last Will and testament
IN WITTNESS whereof I have hereunto sett my hand and Seale dated the twenty eigth day of January as above written
Thomas Noell,
Signed Sealed published and declared by the said Thomas Noell as and for his
last
[NEW PDF PAGE]
last Will and Testament this two and twentieth day of January 1660 in the presence of Nicho Blake James Noell Tho: May ?Soll Daniell
PROBATUM fuit hummoi Testumm apud London viresimo octavo die mensis may Anno Domm Millesimo Sexcentesimo octogesimo septuio Coram vXXX egregio viro Dr:o Richard Raines Milite legum XXXX Curie Prerogative Cantuar Magro Custode sive Commissario XXX constituto Juram:to Martha Ballard als Noell (XXX XX Johannis Ballard) retra dicti defuncti et XXX Exectriy in dei Testamento nominal Cui comissa fuit administratio om et singularum honorm jurament creditora dicti defuncti De bene et fidlr administrand eadem ad XXXX Dei Evangelia (vigore Comissionis) jurat XXXX
Notes
C6/36/77, 1668
This Chancery suit C6/36/77 f. 1 was brought by the London merchant Hugh Upton against Sir Martin Noell's two executors - his son, Thomas Noell, and the merchant George Robinson, who was Sir Martin Noell's former servant.[3]
The answer C6/36/77 f. 2 by Thomas Noell and George Robinson to the Bill of Complaint provides a very detailed accounting of Sir Martin Noell's troubled estate
Suggested links
See C6/36/77 f. 2
Possible primary sources
TNA
C 5/56/57 Noel v. Blake 1670
C 5/58/67 Noell v. Robinson: Middlesex. 1670
C 5/58/68 Noell v. Robinson: Middlesex. 1670
C 5/63/44 Noel v. Robinson: Middlesex. 1671
C 5/63/45 Noel v. Blake: Middlesex. 1671
C 5/381/143 Noell v. Roach 1654
C 5/530/26 Noell v. Blake 1670
C 5/530/28 Noell v. Blake 1672
C 5/531/56 Noell v. Blake: Middlesex. 1670
C 6/36/77 Short title: Upton v Noell. Plaintiffs: Hugh Upton. Defendants: Sir Martin Noell kt and others. Subject: real estate and personal estate Sir Martin Noell kt, of London. Document type: bill, answer. 1668
C 6/64/23 Short title: Blake v Noell. Plaintiffs: George Blake. Defendants: Thomas Noell and George Robinson. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, answer. 1666
C 6/106/112 Short title: Noell v Wingfeild. Plaintiffs: Martin Noell. Defendants: Thomas Wingfield. Subject: rectory of Wethersfield, Essex. Document type: bill, answer. 1640
C 6/136/105 Short title: Noel v Shurlocke. Plaintiffs: Martin Noel and Thomas Gape. Defendants: William Shurlocke, Richard Pillett and Fulke Morris. Subject: property in Southwark, Surrey. Document type: bill, answer. 1656
C 6/147/80 Short title: Maxey v Noell. Plaintiffs: Nathaniel Maxey. Defendants: Martin Noell, George Blake and Anthony Phelpes. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, demurrer. 1660
C 6/147/168 Short title: Walker v Noell. Plaintiffs: John Walker. Defendants: Martin Noell, Hugh Upton, John Upton and Gilbert Upton. Subject: office of collector of the excise on salt in Middlesex. Document type: bill, two answers. 1660
C 6/157/121 Short title: Oxinden v Noell. Plaintiffs: Sir George Oxinden kt and Jane Noke widow. Defendants: Martin Noell, Edward Backwell and James Clitheroe. Subject: money matters. Document type: answer only. 1661
C 6/159/3 Short title: Amcotts v Perry. Plaintiffs: Vincent Amcotts, William Amcotts, Vincent Lawson and Mary Lawson his wife. Defendants: Augustine Perry, Martin Noell and Hugh Upton. Subject: property in Amcotts, Lincolnshire. Document type: two bills, two demurrers, four answers. 1661
C 6/161/74 Short title: Noell v Lockhart. Plaintiffs: Sir Martin Noell kt. Defendants: William Lockhart, William Wildigos and John Ashurst. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, two answers. 1663
C 6/175/49A Short title: Strange v Haylock. Plaintiffs: Thomas Strange. Defendants: Rebecca Haylock widow and Thomas Noell. Subject: property in St Andrew Undershaft, London. Document type: bill, answer. 1666
C 9/229/52 Noell v. Dallison 1665
C 10/51/11 Bushell v. Vyner, Leake, Noell: Middx 1659
C 10/55/132 Noell, Underwood, Delboe and Taylor v. White and Watkins: Middx 1657
C 10/78/15 Croxton v. Noell, knight, Gerrard, Minshall, Mead, and others: Ches. 1665
C 10/79/19 Croxton v. Noell, knight. 1665
C 10/82/2 Sir Robert Abdy baronet, Sir Thomas Rich baronet, Sir James Madiford baronet, Sir Joseph Ash baronet, Sir Thomas Bludworth knight and others v Sir George Oxenden knight, Sir Martin Noel knight, Thomas Atkins, Elizabeth Dallison and others: money matters, Middx 1664
C 10/109/63 Hewett v. Watts, Bushell, Noell, Bonnell, Rastall, Bicknell: Middx 1663
C 10/469/169 Vincent Lawson clerk v Augustine Perry, Sir Martin Noell knight, Hugh Upton, John Upton and Gilbert Upton: Amcott, Lincolnshire. Bill only 1664
C 10/470/103 Oxinden and Noke v. Noell, Throckmorton, Job, Delboe, Pearle, Bretton and others: Middx 1662
C 10/473/131 Noell v. Robinson, Dashwood, Blake and Noell: Middx 1669
C 10/473/135 Noell and Backhouse v. Browne: Middx 1663
C 22/2/26 Amicotts v. Noell. Between 1558 and 1714
C 22/945/3 Noel v. Robinson Between 1558 and 1714
C 22/1036/34 Oxenden v. Noel Between 1558 and 1714
C 22/1048/42 Noel v. Cambden Between 1558 and 1714
- ↑ Thomas Massam was a former ?servant and ?partner of Sir Martin Noell, Thomas Noell's father
- ↑ Martha Noell, the widow of Thomas Noell, had remarried to John Ballard by the time that administration of her deceased husband's will was granted to her
- ↑ Martin Noell was a deponent in a suit brought at the High Court of Admiralty in 1656. In his deposition, dated April 12th, 1656 (CHECK) Noell described Robinson as "this deponents servant but permitted by this deponent to trade for himselfe, and to make use of this deponents correspondance XXXX ParXXX of Rotterdam." (HCA 15/71, f. 214r.)