Difference between revisions of "HCA 13/72 f.319r Annotate"

From MarineLives
Jump to: navigation, search
m
m
 
(18 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
|Folio=319
 
|Folio=319
 
|Side=Recto
 
|Side=Recto
|Status=First cut transcription started and completed on 12/11/13 by Colin Greenstreet
+
|Status=Uploaded image; transcribed on 12/11/2013
 
+
|First transcriber=Colin Greenstreet
|First transcriber=Colin Greenstreet, 12/011/13
+
|First transcribed=2013/11/12
 
+
|Note=IMAGE: IMG_121_11_4963.JPG
|Editorial history=Created 12/11/13, by CSG
+
}}
 
+
{{PageHelp}}
}}{{PageHelp}}
+
 
{{PageTranscription
 
{{PageTranscription
|Transcription image=P1160298
+
|Transcription image={{#transcription-image: IMG_121_11_4963.JPG}}
 
+
 
|Transcription=The 17th day of June 1658/ [CENTRE HEADING]
 
|Transcription=The 17th day of June 1658/ [CENTRE HEADING]
  
henry Jolfe late Master or Comander of the hoy [X]gh the}
+
henry Jolfe late Master or Comander of the hoyjgh the}
 
''Thomas and Katherine'' of Rochester against Richard}
 
''Thomas and Katherine'' of Rochester against Richard}
Cl[XX]e and Company Owners and Proprietors of}
+
Cleeve and Company Owners and Proprietors of}
 
the sayd hoigh and against all others etcetera Thompson}
 
the sayd hoigh and against all others etcetera Thompson}
 
Colquett]
 
Colquett]
Line 27: Line 25:
  
 
'''See the answere to the
 
'''See the answere to the
said in Quire: C: 10'''
+
said in Quire: C: 10'''
  
 
'''Robert Burdin''' of Gillingham in the
 
'''Robert Burdin''' of Gillingham in the
Line 37: Line 35:
 
well knoweth the hoigh or vessell called the ''Thomas and Katherine'' of
 
well knoweth the hoigh or vessell called the ''Thomas and Katherine'' of
 
Rochestyer and saith that in the yeares and moneths arlate or some of
 
Rochestyer and saith that in the yeares and moneths arlate or some of
them the arlate Edward ffawn[?c]e whilst hee lived and the arlate Richard
+
them the arlate Edward ffawnce whilst hee lived and the arlate Richard
 
Cleeve were (and the sayd Cleeve still is) commonly reputed to bee the
 
Cleeve were (and the sayd Cleeve still is) commonly reputed to bee the
 
lawfull Owners and Proprietors of the sayd hoigh or vesselll And alsoe
 
lawfull Owners and Proprietors of the sayd hoigh or vesselll And alsoe
Line 47: Line 45:
 
this deponent in the moneth of July last (the sayd Jolfe being then returned
 
this deponent in the moneth of July last (the sayd Jolfe being then returned
 
home to Gillingham from a voyage hee had made with the sayd hoigh)
 
home to Gillingham from a voyage hee had made with the sayd hoigh)
heard the sayd Edward ffawnee in presence of the sayd Jolfe and this
+
heard the sayd Edward ffawnce in presence of the sayd Jolfe and this
 
deponent and one William Reade of Gillingham who was one of the
 
deponent and one William Reade of Gillingham who was one of the
 
Company of the sayd hoigh confesse and declare that the sayd heny
 
Company of the sayd hoigh confesse and declare that the sayd heny
 
Jolfe was then, and had bin Master of the sayd hoigh by appointment
 
Jolfe was then, and had bin Master of the sayd hoigh by appointment
and order of him the sayd Edward ffawne And that hee the sayd Edward
+
and order of him the sayd Edward ffawnce And that hee the sayd Edward
 
had bargained and agreed with the sayd Jolfe to allowe him the sayd Jolfe
 
had bargained and agreed with the sayd Jolfe to allowe him the sayd Jolfe
 
twenty shillings a weeke to goe Master and Commander of the
 
twenty shillings a weeke to goe Master and Commander of the
Line 64: Line 62:
 
told this deponent at the tyme predeposed when hee soe acknowledged what
 
told this deponent at the tyme predeposed when hee soe acknowledged what
 
weekely wages the sayd Jolfe was by agreement to have that hee the
 
weekely wages the sayd Jolfe was by agreement to have that hee the
sayd ffawn[X] had in regard of the sayd Jolfes case in performance
+
sayd ffawn[ce] had in regard of the sayd Jolfes case in performance
 
of his sayd duty of Master, given him the sayd Jolfe a peece of Cotton to
 
of his sayd duty of Master, given him the sayd Jolfe a peece of Cotton to
 
make his children coates, which hee sayd hee gave him for his
 
make his children coates, which hee sayd hee gave him for his
Line 70: Line 68:
 
by the agreement aforesayd And further saving his foregoeing deposition
 
by the agreement aforesayd And further saving his foregoeing deposition
 
hee cannot depose./
 
hee cannot depose./
 +
|People=<u>Robert Burdin/Burden</u>
 +
 +
"April 8 [????] Robert Burden of Gillingham, Kent, Baker, Widr, abt 55, & Dorothy Collett, of the Liberty of the Tower of London, Wid., abt 60; at St Matfellon alias Whitechapel, Midd."<ref>Allegations for marriage licences issued by the vicar-general of the Archbishop of Canterbury, vol.3 (Canterbury, 1892), p.76</ref>
 +
- '''CSG: Date of marriage ca. 1663'''
 +
 +
"[1664] The half hundred of Gillingham In the said Lath of Ayleford: Chargeable: '''Robert Burden 7 hearth'''"<ref>[http://www.hearthtax.org.uk/communities/kent/kent_1664L_transcript.pdf - Kent Hearth Tax Assessment Lady Day 1664: CKS: Q/RTh Transcribed and computerised by Duncan Harrington,] viewed 04/12/13</ref>
 +
 +
 +
 +
 +
Item: Q/SB/12/14; Title: Correspondence; Description: From Henry Sheafe to Richard Head Esq. Concerns the irreconcilable differences between '''Robert Burden of Gillingham and his wife'''; the settlement reached between Burden and Abbott (Burden's wife's son); Date: 8 Apr 1673; Location: Kent History and Library Centre
 +
 +
"[1677 Aug. 23.] Same from same [Warrant from Treasurer Danby] to Richard Lightfoot, Auditor for co. Kent, for a particular of all the rents and profits of the manor of Gillingham and Grain and of the bailiwick thereof, with a view to a grant of the office of bailiff thereof to '''Edward Burden, loco Robert Burden, lately deceased'''. Warrants not Relating to Money VII., p. 109." <ref>[http://www.british-history.ac.uk/report.aspx?compid=80641 William A. Shaw (ed.), 'Entry Book: August 1677, 21-31', Calendar of Treasury Books, Volume 5: 1676-1679 (1911), pp. 735-740.], viewed 04/12/13</ref>
 +
|Primary sources='''TNA'''
 +
 +
<u>Chancery</u>
 +
 +
C 6/20/89 Short title: Hutchinson v Burden. Plaintiffs: Jarvis Hutchinson . Defendants: Robert Burden and Dorothy Burden his wife. Subject: property in London . Document type: bill, answer. 1664
 +
 +
<u>PROB</u>
  
 +
PROB 11/353/194 Will of Robert Burden, Baker of Gillingham, Kent. 13 February 1677
 
}}
 
}}

Latest revision as of 15:26, August 13, 2016

Expand this area to see details of page purpose, how to register, how to add footnotes, and useful links.




Purpose

This page is for the annotation of HCA 13/72 f.319r.

Annotations can be viewed by everyone on a read-only basis.

For more information on MarineLives and the MarineLives Annotation Project read our Shipping News blog entries:

Annotating Marine Lives, May 1st 2013
Adding value to primary documents, May 8th 2013
Witnesses in Court, 1657-1658 (May 9th, 2013)




Registration to annotate documents

Registration is required to contribute annotations to this page and to other pages in the wiki.

You can register using the following Form, and we will issue you with a UserName and Password for the wiki.




Text formatting

The MarineLives transcription platform is built on MediaWiki, which uses wiki markup to format text. For a guide showing how to produce italics, bold, escaped text and headings, see the MediaWiki page on formatting; there are also guides for internal and external links, image embedding, tables, and more on lists.




Adding footnotes

  • Go into edit mode
  • Insert immediately after the sentence or phrase you wish to annotate the following macro:<ref>This is the footnote text</ref>
  • Replace 'This is the footnote text' with the footnote you wish to add, using the format: first name, surname, title, (place of publication, date of publication), page or folio number
  • Save the page


For more information and advanced formatting, including how to add and format links within the footnote, see the Wikipedia help on footnotes. This uses the same markup formatting.

Example footnote template:

  • ''HCA 13/XX f.XXXX Case: XXXX; Deposition: XXXX; Date: XXXX. Transcribed by XXXX''<ref>[http://XXXXX Electronic link to a digital source]</ref>




Suggested links

Annotate HCA 13/64 Volume Page
Annotate HCA 13/65 Volume Page
Annotate HCA 13/68 Volume Page
Annotate HCA 13/69 Volume Page
Annotate HCA 13/70 Volume Page
Annotate HCA 13/71 Volume Page
Annotate HCA 13/72 Volume Page
Annotate HCA 13/73 Volume Page
Annotate HCA 13/74 Volume Page
Marine Lives Tools

Image

HCA 13/72 f.319r: Right click on image for full size image in separate window

Transcription

The 17th day of June 1658/ [CENTRE HEADING]

henry Jolfe late Master or Comander of the hoyjgh the}
Thomas and Katherine of Rochester against Richard}
Cleeve and Company Owners and Proprietors of}
the sayd hoigh and against all others etcetera Thompson}
Colquett]

Examined on the libell given i on the behalfe
of the sayd Jolfe./

Rp. 1

See the answere to the
said in Quire: C: 10

Robert Burdin of Gillingham in the
County of Kent Baker aged fiftie yeares or
thereabouts a wittnesse sworne and examined
saith and deposeth as followeth videlicet./

To the first and second articles of the sayd allegation hee saith hee
well knoweth the hoigh or vessell called the Thomas and Katherine of
Rochestyer and saith that in the yeares and moneths arlate or some of
them the arlate Edward ffawnce whilst hee lived and the arlate Richard
Cleeve were (and the sayd Cleeve still is) commonly reputed to bee the
lawfull Owners and Proprietors of the sayd hoigh or vesselll And alsoe
knoweth that for some moneths happening within the tyme arlate (the certayne
tyme hee doth not remember but beleeveth for about halfe a yeare thereof)
the arlate henry Jolfe was Master of the sayd hoigh and had the charge
government and imployment thereof for the use and benefitt of the sayd
Owners And for Master therefore was Commonly accompted And hee
this deponent in the moneth of July last (the sayd Jolfe being then returned
home to Gillingham from a voyage hee had made with the sayd hoigh)
heard the sayd Edward ffawnce in presence of the sayd Jolfe and this
deponent and one William Reade of Gillingham who was one of the
Company of the sayd hoigh confesse and declare that the sayd heny
Jolfe was then, and had bin Master of the sayd hoigh by appointment
and order of him the sayd Edward ffawnce And that hee the sayd Edward
had bargained and agreed with the sayd Jolfe to allowe him the sayd Jolfe
twenty shillings a weeke to goe Master and Commander of the
sayd hoye for the ise and benefitt of him the sayd ffawne and other
the Owners of her And further to those articles hee cannot depose/

To the 3 and 4th articles of the sayd libell hee saith as is predeposed that
hee knoweth that the sayd Jolfe did take upon him the Mastershipp of the
sayd hoigh and went Master of her for the use of the sayd Owners for about
halfe a yeare happening within the tyme aforesayd, And as hee beleeveth
did performe his office faithfully and well, for that the sayd ffawn[XX]
told this deponent at the tyme predeposed when hee soe acknowledged what
weekely wages the sayd Jolfe was by agreement to have that hee the
sayd ffawn[ce] had in regard of the sayd Jolfes case in performance
of his sayd duty of Master, given him the sayd Jolfe a peece of Cotton to
make his children coates, which hee sayd hee gave him for his
care in his sayd imployment, over and above what should bee due to him
by the agreement aforesayd And further saving his foregoeing deposition
hee cannot depose./

Topics

People


Robert Burdin/Burden

"April 8 [????] Robert Burden of Gillingham, Kent, Baker, Widr, abt 55, & Dorothy Collett, of the Liberty of the Tower of London, Wid., abt 60; at St Matfellon alias Whitechapel, Midd."[1]
- CSG: Date of marriage ca. 1663

"[1664] The half hundred of Gillingham In the said Lath of Ayleford: Chargeable: Robert Burden 7 hearth"[2]



Item: Q/SB/12/14; Title: Correspondence; Description: From Henry Sheafe to Richard Head Esq. Concerns the irreconcilable differences between Robert Burden of Gillingham and his wife; the settlement reached between Burden and Abbott (Burden's wife's son); Date: 8 Apr 1673; Location: Kent History and Library Centre

"[1677 Aug. 23.] Same from same [Warrant from Treasurer Danby] to Richard Lightfoot, Auditor for co. Kent, for a particular of all the rents and profits of the manor of Gillingham and Grain and of the bailiwick thereof, with a view to a grant of the office of bailiff thereof to Edward Burden, loco Robert Burden, lately deceased. Warrants not Relating to Money VII., p. 109." [3]

Sources

Primary sources


TNA

Chancery

C 6/20/89 Short title: Hutchinson v Burden. Plaintiffs: Jarvis Hutchinson . Defendants: Robert Burden and Dorothy Burden his wife. Subject: property in London . Document type: bill, answer. 1664

PROB

PROB 11/353/194 Will of Robert Burden, Baker of Gillingham, Kent. 13 February 1677
  1. Allegations for marriage licences issued by the vicar-general of the Archbishop of Canterbury, vol.3 (Canterbury, 1892), p.76
  2. - Kent Hearth Tax Assessment Lady Day 1664: CKS: Q/RTh Transcribed and computerised by Duncan Harrington, viewed 04/12/13
  3. William A. Shaw (ed.), 'Entry Book: August 1677, 21-31', Calendar of Treasury Books, Volume 5: 1676-1679 (1911), pp. 735-740., viewed 04/12/13