Difference between revisions of "HCA 13/70 f.519v Annotate"

From MarineLives
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 9: Line 9:
 
|Transcription image=[[File:IMG_0652.JPG|thumbnail|800px|none|HCA 13/70 f.519v: Right click on image for full size image in separate window]]
 
|Transcription image=[[File:IMG_0652.JPG|thumbnail|800px|none|HCA 13/70 f.519v: Right click on image for full size image in separate window]]
  
|Transcription=put upon the Waterhound by her Company hee knoweth not nor hath heard and further saving his foregoing deposition hee cannot answere
+
|Transcription=put upon the ''Waterhound'' by her Company hee knoweth not nor hath heard and further saving his foregoing deposition hee cannot answere
To the 3 hee saith the William laye at Tower wharfe empty the tyme Interrogate And saith hee knoweth not nor hath heard that the Wharfinger commanded the William to be gone before the Waterhound came, nor whether the wharfinger gave any order for the Waterhound to come thither to unlade, And saith the Waterhound was then a laden shipp and the William empty and beleeveth by the Custome of the River the Company of the William ( if it had bin day tyme or if it was not and that the Company of the Waterhound had given them sufficient notice and tyme and liberty soe to doe  which hee saith they did not ) ought to have brought their empty shipp outermost and saith his Contest(?) William Smith did call to the Company of the Waterhound, before they lufted their sayd shipp inwards upon the William and bid them have a care and not luft their sayd shipp inwards for if they did it would squeese  the William to XXXXX or words to that effect And further saving his foregoing deposition hee cannot answere.
+
To the 3 hee saith the ''William'' laye at Tower wharfe empty the tyme Interrogate And saith hee knoweth not nor hath heard that the Wharfinger commanded the ''William'' to be gone before the ''Waterhound'' came, nor whether the wharfinger gave any order for the ''Waterhound'' to come thither to unlade, And saith the ''Waterhound'' was then a laden shipp and the ''William'' empty and beleeveth by the Custome of the River the Company of the ''William'' ( if it had bin day tyme or if it was not and that the Company of the ''Waterhound'' had given them sufficient notice and tyme and liberty soe to doe  which hee saith they did not ) ought to have brought their empty shipp outermost and saith his Contest(?) William Smith did call to the Company of the ''Waterhound'', before they lufted their sayd shipp inwards upon the ''William'' and bid them have a care and not luft their sayd shipp inwards for if they did it would squeese  the ''William'' to XXXXX or words to that effect And further saving his foregoing deposition hee cannot answere.
To the 4th Interrogatorie hee saith the William after her rideing fower shipps a brest did on the Wednesday the 19th of this September goe away, but spake not that hee knoweth or hath heard of to Constant and his Company to helpe them out , but that the shipp on the inside of the William being goeing out the William alsoe went out with her , and saith that Constant in moveing his hawser to let them out did XXXXX a small blow on his hand with his own hawser but not soe as any way to endanger any part of his hand And to the rest of the Interrogatorie  hee answereth negatively referring him selfe to his deposition to the sixth article of the libell wherein hee hath truly and as fully as hee can answered the rest of the Interrogatories And further cannot answere.
+
To the 4th Interrogatorie hee saith the ''William'' after her rideing fower shipps a brest did on the Wednesday the 19th of this September goe away, but spake not that hee knoweth or hath heard of to Constant and his Company to helpe them out , but that the shipp on the inside of the ''William'' being goeing out the ''William'' alsoe went out with her , and saith that Constant in moveing his hawser to let them out did XXXXX a small blow on his hand with his own hawser but not soe as any way to endanger any part of his hand And to the rest of the Interrogatorie  hee answereth negatively referring him selfe to his deposition to the sixth article of the libell wherein hee hath truly and as fully as hee can answered the rest of the Interrogatories And further cannot answere.
 
                                                                                                             The mark of the sayd
 
                                                                                                             The mark of the sayd
 
                                                                                                     Thomas T Reedman
 
                                                                                                     Thomas T Reedman
Line 19: Line 19:
 
  (?  Suckley )                                          The sayd William Smith upon Interrogatorie
 
  (?  Suckley )                                          The sayd William Smith upon Interrogatorie
  
  To the first Interrogatorie hee saith hee cometh to testifie the truth of his knowledge in this cause being soe required to doe by the  Interrogate Huntington and was and is pylott of the William and hath three pounds due to him for wages which hee expecteth to receive(?) of the sayd Huntington and other Owners  of the William, and saith hee hath used the sea as a Master and pylott of shipps for these thirty yeares last or thereabouts and hath observed that it is a usuall custome at Tower wharfe and other wharfes on the River of Thames for three shipps and not above to ryde a brest one of an other and saith hee well remembereth that within the sayd tyme hee transgressing and making a fowerth a brest at Porter’s(?) Key was for such his offence arrested by James Gyes an official of the Admiralty and was faiXX to compound for the same  And further to this Interrogatorie hee cannot answere
+
  To the first Interrogatorie hee saith hee cometh to testifie the truth of his knowledge in this cause being soe required to doe by the  Interrogate Huntington and was and is pylott of the ''William'' and hath three pounds due to him for wages which hee expecteth to receive(?) of the sayd Huntington and other Owners  of the ''William'', and saith hee hath used the sea as a Master and pylott of shipps for these thirty yeares last or thereabouts and hath observed that it is a usuall custome at Tower wharfe and other wharfes on the River of Thames for three shipps and not above to ryde a brest one of an other and saith hee well remembereth that within the sayd tyme hee transgressing and making a fowerth a brest at Porter’s(?) Key was for such his offence arrested by James Gyes an official of the Admiralty and was faiXX to compound for the same  And further to this Interrogatorie hee cannot answere
To the 2 Interrogatorie hee saith the William was empty when the Waterhound came to her side and saith it was the duty of the William’s Company to put out fenders, and hee this deponent and ffrancis Everett and George Watts did accordingly put out fenders about an hower after the Waterhound came to her side, and before the Waterhound lufted inwards upon her, and saith notwithstanding her fenders the William being a smaler ship and empty might and was damnified in manner predeposed as the tyde forsooke her by reason of the Waterhound lufting inwards and leaning upon her as aforesaid, And saith there was an Anchor being(?) hunge over the syde of the Waterhound by some of her Company for a fender, but the same did not more hurt than good to the Waterhound being laden and lufting inward and leaning upon the William which was empty And further hee cannot answere
+
To the 2 Interrogatorie hee saith the ''William'' was empty when the ''Waterhound'' came to her side and saith it was the duty of the ''William’s'' Company to put out fenders, and hee this deponent and ffrancis Everett and George Watts did accordingly put out fenders about an hower after the ''Waterhound'' came to her side, and before the ''Waterhound'' lufted inwards upon her, and saith notwithstanding her fenders the ''William'' being a smaler ship and empty might and was damnified in manner predeposed as the tyde forsooke her by reason of the ''Waterhound'' lufting inwards and leaning upon her as aforesaid, And saith there was an Anchor being(?) hunge over the syde of the ''Waterhound'' by some of her Company for a fender, but the same did not more hurt than good to the ''Waterhound'' being laden and lufting inward and leaning upon the ''William'' which was empty And further hee cannot answere
To the 3 hee saith the tyme Interrogate the William lay at Tower wharfe empty but noe order or command was given by the wharfinger ( that this deponent ever heard of ) for her departure before the Waterhound came nor after neither knoweth hee or hath heard that the wharfinger gave any order for the Waterhound to come
+
To the 3 hee saith the tyme Interrogate the ''William'' lay at Tower wharfe empty but noe order or command was given by the wharfinger ( that this deponent ever heard of ) for her departure before the ''Waterhound'' came nor after neither knoweth hee or hath heard that the wharfinger gave any order for the ''Waterhound'' to come
 
                                                                 thither
 
                                                                 thither
  
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 13:13, January 11, 2015

Expand this area to see details of page purpose, how to register, how to add footnotes, and useful links.




Purpose

This page is for the annotation of HCA 13/70 f.519v.

Annotations can be viewed by everyone on a read-only basis.

For more information on MarineLives and the MarineLives Annotation Project read our Shipping News blog entries:

Annotating Marine Lives, May 1st 2013
Adding value to primary documents, May 8th 2013
Witnesses in Court, 1657-1658 (May 9th, 2013)




Registration to annotate documents

Registration is required to contribute annotations to this page and to other pages in the wiki.

You can register using the following Form, and we will issue you with a UserName and Password for the wiki.




Text formatting

The MarineLives transcription platform is built on MediaWiki, which uses wiki markup to format text. For a guide showing how to produce italics, bold, escaped text and headings, see the MediaWiki page on formatting; there are also guides for internal and external links, image embedding, tables, and more on lists.




Adding footnotes

  • Go into edit mode
  • Insert immediately after the sentence or phrase you wish to annotate the following macro:<ref>This is the footnote text</ref>
  • Replace 'This is the footnote text' with the footnote you wish to add, using the format: first name, surname, title, (place of publication, date of publication), page or folio number
  • Save the page


For more information and advanced formatting, including how to add and format links within the footnote, see the Wikipedia help on footnotes. This uses the same markup formatting.

Example footnote template:

  • ''HCA 13/XX f.XXXX Case: XXXX; Deposition: XXXX; Date: XXXX. Transcribed by XXXX''<ref>[http://XXXXX Electronic link to a digital source]</ref>




Suggested links

Annotate HCA 13/64 Volume Page
Annotate HCA 13/65 Volume Page
Annotate HCA 13/68 Volume Page
Annotate HCA 13/69 Volume Page
Annotate HCA 13/70 Volume Page
Annotate HCA 13/71 Volume Page
Annotate HCA 13/72 Volume Page
Annotate HCA 13/73 Volume Page
Annotate HCA 13/74 Volume Page
Marine Lives Tools

Image

HCA 13/70 f.519v: Right click on image for full size image in separate window

Transcription

put upon the Waterhound by her Company hee knoweth not nor hath heard and further saving his foregoing deposition hee cannot answere
To the 3 hee saith the William laye at Tower wharfe empty the tyme Interrogate And saith hee knoweth not nor hath heard that the Wharfinger commanded the William to be gone before the Waterhound came, nor whether the wharfinger gave any order for the Waterhound to come thither to unlade, And saith the Waterhound was then a laden shipp and the William empty and beleeveth by the Custome of the River the Company of the William ( if it had bin day tyme or if it was not and that the Company of the Waterhound had given them sufficient notice and tyme and liberty soe to doe which hee saith they did not ) ought to have brought their empty shipp outermost and saith his Contest(?) William Smith did call to the Company of the Waterhound, before they lufted their sayd shipp inwards upon the William and bid them have a care and not luft their sayd shipp inwards for if they did it would squeese the William to XXXXX or words to that effect And further saving his foregoing deposition hee cannot answere.
To the 4th Interrogatorie hee saith the William after her rideing fower shipps a brest did on the Wednesday the 19th of this September goe away, but spake not that hee knoweth or hath heard of to Constant and his Company to helpe them out , but that the shipp on the inside of the William being goeing out the William alsoe went out with her , and saith that Constant in moveing his hawser to let them out did XXXXX a small blow on his hand with his own hawser but not soe as any way to endanger any part of his hand And to the rest of the Interrogatorie hee answereth negatively referring him selfe to his deposition to the sixth article of the libell wherein hee hath truly and as fully as hee can answered the rest of the Interrogatories And further cannot answere.

                                                                                                            The mark of the sayd
                                                                                                   Thomas T Reedman

Repeated before Dr Godolphin

                                                                The same day


(?  Suckley )                                          The sayd William Smith upon Interrogatorie


To the first Interrogatorie hee saith hee cometh to testifie the truth of his knowledge in this cause being soe required to doe by the  Interrogate Huntington and was and is pylott of the William and hath three pounds due to him for wages which hee expecteth to receive(?) of the sayd Huntington and other Owners  of the William, and saith hee hath used the sea as a Master and pylott of shipps for these thirty yeares last or thereabouts and hath observed that it is a usuall custome at Tower wharfe and other wharfes on the River of Thames for three shipps and not above to ryde a brest one of an other and saith hee well remembereth that within the sayd tyme hee transgressing and making a fowerth a brest at Porter’s(?) Key was for such his offence arrested by James Gyes an official of the Admiralty and was faiXX to compound for the same  And further to this Interrogatorie hee cannot answere

To the 2 Interrogatorie hee saith the William was empty when the Waterhound came to her side and saith it was the duty of the William’s Company to put out fenders, and hee this deponent and ffrancis Everett and George Watts did accordingly put out fenders about an hower after the Waterhound came to her side, and before the Waterhound lufted inwards upon her, and saith notwithstanding her fenders the William being a smaler ship and empty might and was damnified in manner predeposed as the tyde forsooke her by reason of the Waterhound lufting inwards and leaning upon her as aforesaid, And saith there was an Anchor being(?) hunge over the syde of the Waterhound by some of her Company for a fender, but the same did not more hurt than good to the Waterhound being laden and lufting inward and leaning upon the William which was empty And further hee cannot answere
To the 3 hee saith the tyme Interrogate the William lay at Tower wharfe empty but noe order or command was given by the wharfinger ( that this deponent ever heard of ) for her departure before the Waterhound came nor after neither knoweth hee or hath heard that the wharfinger gave any order for the Waterhound to come

                                                               thither