David Adamsone

From MarineLives
Revision as of 16:28, November 4, 2016 by ColinGreenstreet (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

David Adamsone
Person David Adamsone
First name David
Middle name(s)
Last name Adamsone
Spouse of
Widow of
Occupation Mariner
Secondary shorebased occupation
Mariner occupation Master
Associated with ship(s) Successe of Dover (Master: David Adamsone)
Training Not apprentice
Is apprentice of
Was apprentice of
Had apprentice(s)
Citizen Unknown
Literacy Signature
Has opening text David Adamson
Has signoff text David Adamsone
Signoff image (Invalid transcription image)
Language skills English language
Has interpreter
Birth street
Birth parish
Birth town
Birth county
Birth province
Birth country
Res street
Res parish
Res town Dover
Res county Kent
Res province
Res country England
Birth year 1619
Marriage year
Death year
Probate date
First deposition age 36
Primary sources
Act book start page(s)
Personal answer start page(s)
Allegation start page(s)
Interrogatories page(s)
Deposition start page(s) HCA 13/70 f.45r Annotate
Chancery start page(s)
Letter start page(s)
Miscellaneous start page(s)
Act book date(s)
Personal answer date(s)
Allegation date(s)
Interrogatories date(s)
Deposition date(s) Jan 3 1655
How complete is this biography?
Has infobox completed Yes
Has synthesis completed No
Has HCA evidence completed No
Has source comment completed No
Ship classification
Type of ship Coal ship
Silver Ship litigation in 1650s
Role in Silver Ship litigation None

Biographical synthesis

David Adamsone (alt. Adamson) (b. ca. 1619; d. ?). Mariner.

Late master of the ship the Successe of Dover.

Resident in 1655 in Dover in the county of Kent.Thirty-six year old David Adamsone deposed on January 3rd 1655 in the High Court of Admiralty. He was examined on an allegation on behalf of Michaell De Haze and Abraham Stock in the cause "De Haze and Stock owners of the Successe against the vessell the Dove Walter Cable master".[1]1619

Evidence from High Court of Admiralty

Comment on sources

  1. HCA 13/70 f.45r