MRP: Possible new primary sources

From MarineLives
Revision as of 09:30, November 1, 2011 by ColinGreenstreet (Talk | contribs)

Jump to: navigation, search

Possible new primary sources


Sir Robert Abdy & family


Court of Chancery

C 10/18/67 Jacobson v Cambell, Abdy, Dewitt and Hill: Notts 1653
C 10/19/66 Robert Levett v Jacob Searle, Nicholas Gould, Robert Abdy, William Williams, Andrew Rickards, Nathan Wright and others: money matters, Middlesex. Bill and answer 1653 ORDERED 18/08/11 12.41
C 10/33/37 Cambell & Abdy bart, v Massingbird, Andrewes, Eastwicke, Moyer, and others: Middx 1651
C 10/52/6 Robert Abdy and others v James Wych: money matters. Demurrer 1659
C 10/54/7 Robert Abdy, George Smith, Edward Kempe and others v James Wych: monexy matters. Answer 1659 (Document is unorderable)

C 22/915/25 Smith v Abdy baronet & others Between 1558 and 1714


Edward Backwell


Edward Backwell (b. c.1618, d.1683) was a prominent London goldsmith banker.

Court of Chancery

C 5/113/13 Backwell v. Povey: Middlesex 1694
C 5/117/5 Backwell v. Povey 1695
C 5/442/27 Backwell v. Hodgkins: Middlesex 1666
C 6/157/121 Short title: Oxinden v Noell. Plaintiffs: Sir George Oxinden kt and Jane Noke widow. Defendants: Martin Noell, Edward Backwell and James Clitheroe. Subject: money matters. Document type: answer only. 1661
C 6/187/22 Short title: Backwell v Lydcot. Plaintiffs: Edward Backwell. Defendants: Giles Lydcot. Subject: money matters. Document type: answer only. 1668
C 6/187/25 Short title: Backwell v Lydcote. Plaintiffs: Edward Backwell. Defendants: Giles Lydcote, Sir John Bankes baronet, Augustine Coronell, John Penrice and John Culling. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, five answers. 1668
C 6/189/12 Short title: Backwell v Tyringham. Plaintiffs: Edward Backwell. Defendants: William Tyringham, Joseph Radcliffe, John Walker, Alexander Hurlston, Humphrey Hurlston, Isaac Hurlston, Thomas Hurlston and others. Subject: manor of Tyringham, Buckinghamshire. Document type: bill, seven answers. 1669
C 6/215/63 Short title: Knipe v Backwell. Plaintiffs: Edward Knipe. Defendants: Edward Backwell. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, plea. 1674
C 6/220/12 Short title: Backwell v Maynard. Plaintiffs: Edward Backwell. Defendants: Edward Maynard and Thomas Rudyard. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, answer. 1676
C 6/220/13 Short title: Backwell v Huniades. Plaintiffs: Edward Backwell. Defendants: John Huniades and Thomas Rudyard. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, answer. 1676
C 6/588/48 Short title: Backwell v Backwell. First plaintiff: Backwell. Defendants: Backwell. Document type: bill only. [1649-1714]
C 9/30/10 Backwell v. Burridge 1672
C 9/241/143 C 9/241/143 1658
C 9/411/123 Squire v. Backwell 1667
C 10/154/15 Backwell v. Rivers, Hide, Wharton: Middx 1670
C 10/167/7 Backwell v. Squire: Middx 1667
C 10/108/28 Crumwell, knight, Chichley, Backwell & Wormell v. Russell, bart & Phillipps: 1668
C 10/155/38 Cutlere v. Ryder, knight, Cocke, Backwell & Herne: Middx. 1669
C 10/231/21 Exeter, Cranmer, Humble, Oxinden, Blackburne v. Backwell, Mountrey, Snagg, Morris: Middx 1689
C 10/478/58 Godden v. Tyringham and Backwell: Buckingham 1670
C 10/465/164 Jarrard v. Taylor, Backwell and Sherston: Middx 1657
C 10/72/88 Mary Leigh widow and Edward Backwell v Charles Kerr Earl of Ancram: copyhold held of the manor of Richmond, Surrey. Bill and answer 1663
C 10/90/77 Giles Lidcott v Edward Backwell: money matters. Answer 1669
C 10/103/94 William Lovett and Edward Backwell v Henry Toplady: money matters. Answer 1667
C 10/489/107 William Lovett and Edward Backwell v John Deboys and Charles Hearle: money matters, Middlesex. Bill only 1666
C 10/209/50 Mountney v Backwell, Whittingham, Dalton, Hind, Kirwood and others: Middlesex 1681
C 10/64/59 Pickering, Vyner and Backwell v. Tempest, Harris and others: Cambs 1661
C 10/112/35 Giles Lytcot v Edward Backwell: money matters, Middlesex. Bill and answer 1668
C 22/205/42 Wortley v. Backwell. 1683
C 22/588/16 Backwell v. Wortley. Between 1558 and 1714

E 133/94/64 Owen v Backwell Eliz. - Victoria
E 133/143/3 The Crown v. Backwell Eliz. - Victoria
E 134/25Chas2/East22 Thomas Bodly v. Sir John Shaw, Sir Robt. Viner, Sir Edmd. Emner, Edwd. Backwell, Fras. Millington.: Thos. Russell, appointed by defendants (farmers of H.M. Customs) collector of customs and subsidies in the port of Southampton. Touching his sureties, viz. 25 Chas 2
E 406/20 Backwell 1676-1701
E 407/8/179 A general account of the interest and allowances due by the king to Edward Backwell for loans advanced 1669 June 24

SP 46/97/fo 98-99 Warrant for payment of £6,210 to Edward Backwell, goldsmith, for his relinquishment of land at Hampton Court. Signed by Henry Lawrence, President of the Council. Backwell's receipt; 13 March 1653/4. 1653/4 Mar. 10
SP 46/102/22 Orders and warrants from council of state: to trustees for sale of king's, queen's and prince's lands to pay John Backwell £1,900 for his interest in part of Hampton Court. ff. 31, 32 1654 February 20
SP 89/12 The account as it stood when Parry took the collection over from Mr. Pollexfen, Alderman Backwell's deputy. 1671

AO 1/848/1 Roll 1 E. Backwell. 1662


Sir Henry Barnard


Court of Chancery

C 6/196/9 Short title: Barnard v Willoughby. Plaintiffs: HENRY Barnard. Defendants: Francis Willoughby, Emma Willoughby his wife and Francis Lacon. Subject: property in Ivington, Herefordshire. Document type: bill, answer. 1671
C 10/160/5 Sir Joseph Ash baronet v Christopher Dodsworth, Mary Dodsworth, Henry Barnard, Francis Mose and John Jewkes: Twickenham, Middx 1669
C 10/165/7 Sir John Ash baronet v Christopher Dodsworth, Mary Dodsworth widow, Henry Barnard, Francis Mose and John Jewkes: Twickenham, Middx. Answer 1669


Sir Thomas Bludworth & family


Court of Chancery

C 10/99/17 Brandon v. Gunn, Bludworth, Joliffe, Barnardiston 1662
C 10/66/37
C 10/473/33 Chaplin, Knight, Reekford, Moddiford, Bragg, Orgill & Duck v. Bludworth, knight, Chappell, Dike, Feilder, Birkett, and others: Middx 1670
C10/66/45
C 10/96/51 Dennis, Buckworth v. Gunn, Bludworth, Joliffe, Barnardiston
C 10/66/78
(and a few more)


Thomas Bromfield & family


Edwin Browne & family


Court of Chancery


Thomas Burnell & family


Court of Chancery


James Clitherow & family


Court of Chancery


George Cock(e)


Large number of Cock(e) Chancery documents in 1650s and 1660s, but hard to separate out those with good probability of relating to George Cock8e), the London merchant

C 202/39/2 Return of Writs: Newcastle-on-Tyne - Certiorari, executors of Cock v. Tempest 1655 1655 East.
C 2/ChasI/C29/5 Short title: Cock v Hoare. Plaintiff: Cock. Defendant: Hoare. Document type: Bill only. 1625-1660
C 5/598/125 Cocks v. Maynard: Middlesex 1644
C 6/36/20 hort title: Cock v Nuthall. Plaintiffs: George Cock. Defendants: Penella Nuthall , [unknown Scott], and others. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, answer, demurrer. 1669
C 6/36/21 Short title: Cock v Letten. Plaintiffs: George Cock and John Fenn. Defendants: John Letten and another. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, answer, schedule. 1670
C 6/52/16 Short title: Cock v Cuttance. Plaintiffs: George Cock. Defendants: Sir Roger Cuttance kt. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, answer. 1671
C 6/52/17 Short title: Cock v Mathewes. Plaintiffs: George Cock. Defendants: Thomas Mathewes. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, answer, schedule. 1672
C 6/200/11 Short title: Cock v Nuttall. Plaintiffs: George Cock. Defendants: Penella Nuttall widow. Subject: money matters Document type: answer only. 1669
C 6/201/21 Short title: Cocke v Letten. Plaintiffs: George Cocke and John Fenn. Defendants: John Letten. Subject: money matters. Document type: answer only. 1670
C 6/201/25 Short title: Cock v Vanderhoeve. Plaintiffs: George Cock. Defendants: John Baptista Vanderhoeve and George Matson. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, answer. 1670
C 9/405/32 Cock v. Meade 1659
C 9/22/37 Cocke v. Pearle 1660
C 9/228/51 Cock v. Pearle 1659
C 9/228/48 Cock v. Pipley 1661
C 9/24/39 Cocke v. Pixley 1661
C 9/24/48 Cocke v. Pixley 1661
C 9/24/47 Cocke v. Pixley 1661
C 9/26/40 Cock v. Pixley 1661
C 9/407/128 Heathcocke v. Cocke 1660
C 9/228/178 Pixley v. Cock 1661
C 9/409/267 Pixley v. Cock 1662
C 10/155/38 Cutlere v. Ryder, knight, Cocke, Backwell & Herne: Middx. 1669
C 10/178/34 Cocke v. Pearle: Middx. 1660
C 10/468/40 Cock v. Pexley: Middx. 1660
C 10/99/150 Pixley v Cocke 1663
C 22/371/6 Heathcock v Cock. Between 1558 and 1714



Robert Cranmer & family


Court of Chancery

C 10/72/23 Bornfold v. Andrewes, Winter, Edwards, Cranmer, Tomlins: Middx 1661
C 10/35/57 Conway v. Ayleworth, Pennoyer, Borneford, Somersley & Cranmer: Warw. 1655
C 10/98/2 Thomas Andrewes, Thomas Winter, James Edwards and Thomas Tomlyns v Jane Bornford and Robert Cranmer: money matters, Middx 1663


Nicholas Cooke & family


Court of Chancery


William Cutler


Court of Chancery

C 5/407/169 Cutler v. Alleyn: Middlesex 1664
C 5/468/109 Cutler v. Howland: Middlesex 1670
C 5/468/111 Cutler v. Justice: Middlesex 1669
C 5/54/40 Ford v. Cutler 1668
C 5/24/62 Pride v. Cutler: Middlesex. 1652
C 5/404/285 Robinson v. Cutler 1647
C 5/53/78 Sowton v. Cutler: Middlesex. 1669
C 6/218/65 Short title: Sowton v Cutler. Plaintiffs: Samuel Sowton. Defendants: Thomas Cutler and David Clarke. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, two answers, three schedules. 1676
C 6/227/80 Short title: Sowton v Westland. Plaintiffs: Samuel Sowton. Defendants: Oliver Westland and Thomas Cutler. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, plea. 1677
C 6/584/205 Short title: Warren v Cutler. First plaintiff: Warren. Defendants: Cutler. Document type: bill only. [1649-1714]
C 6/597/21 Short title: Cutler v Colvel. First plaintiff: Cutler. Defendants: Colvel. Document type: bill only. [1649-1714]
C 6/602/75 Short title: Cutler v Howland. First plaintiff: Cutler. Defendants: Howland. Document type: bill only. [1649-1714]
C 9/9/21 Cutler v. Wynard 1652
- Is "Wynard" a TNA transcription error for "Maynard"?
C 9/27/57 Elliott v. Orlibeare and Cutler 1662
C 9/410/111 Rich v. Cutler 1656
C 10/472/21 Browne v. Cutler: Middx 1667
C 10/472/22 Browne v. Cutler: Middx 1667
C 10/74/18 Cutler v. Parkhurst, knight, Abdy, bart, Maynard, knight, Stowell & Mills: Middx. 1663
C 10/98/19 Cutler v. Page: Middx. 1663
- Have checked John Page letters (BHOL) for references to Cutler, but the published Paige letters are only for the years 1648-1658.[1]
C 10/155/38 Cutlere v. Ryder, knight, Cocke, Backwell & Herne: Middx. 1669
- See Transcriptions C10/155/38 f. 1, C10/155/38 f. 2, C10/155/38 f. 3
C 10/158/28 Cutler & Goodwin v. Travers & Howland: Middx. 1670
C 10/73/45 Everard v. Cutler: Middx 1663
C 10/472/96 Heath v. Cutler, Morris, Cleyton, Stampe, Yates, Chapman and Beddard: Ireland 1667
C 10/108/85 Keate v. Cutler: Middx 1664
C 10/475/162 John Lloyd v William Cutler, Jeremy Carter and William Gomeldon: St. Peter le Poer, London, Middlesex. Bill only 1670
C 10/470/94 Maynard v Colvile, Portman, Cutler, Royle and Bradford: Middlesex 1670
C 10/72/122 Page v. Cutler: Middx 1661
C 10/53/22 Billingsley v. Foote, Cutler: Middx 1659
C 10/59/39 Cutler v. Copping: Middx. 1660
C 22/597/10 Bathurst v. Cutler. Between 1558 and 1714


Francis Dashwood & family


Court of Chancery

C 10/74/1 Roger Andrewes, John Connis, William Pennoyer, Francis Dashwood and Edward Crispe v Frederick Skinner: mones matters, Middx.


Simon Delboe & family

Court of Chancery


Sir Mathew Hollworthy & family


Court of Chancery

C 3/447/151 Short title: Holworthy v Holworthy. Plaintiffs: Mary Holworthy widow. Defendants: Matthew Holworthy and others. Subject: money matters in Gloucestershire. Document type: [pleadings]. SFP 1642-1660
C 5/410/122 Holworthy v. Wych: Middlesex. 1654
C 5/410/123 Holworthy v. Drawater: Middlesex. 1659
C 5/381/131 Lounce v. Holworthy 1651
C 5/386/97 Launce v. Holworthy 1651
C 10/59/16 Bolle, Andrewed, Modyford, Holworthy, Dawes v. Canham, Thompson, Rives, Bellamy: Middx 1669
C 22/370/57 Holworthy v Dethyck. Between 1558 and 1714

E 134/3&4Chas1/Hil3 Sir William Waller, knight, Abell Kitchen, John Guy, Richard Holworthy v. Francis Derrick, Edward Ballhashe.: Prisage of wines coming to the Port of Bristol from St. Mallowes (St. Malo), in the year 1626. Of what vintage? &c., &c.: Bristol 3 & 4 Chas 1


John Jolliffe & family


Court of Chancery

C 10/99/17 Brandon v. Gunn, Bludworth, Joliffe, Barnardiston 1662
C 10/96/51 Dennis, Buckworth v. Gunn, Bludworth, Joliffe, barnardiston


James Lane & family


Court of Chancery


Edward Lewis & family


Court of Chancery


Charles Longland & family


Court of Chancery


William Love


Court of Chancery

C 10/178/71
C 10/185/51
C 10/185/52
C 22/803/34
C 22/803/14
C 22/803/47


James Man(n) & family


Court of Chancery


William Meggs & family


Court of Chancery

C 10/57/109 Gore, Woodward and Meggs v. East India company, Governor &c. and others 1652


Sir James Modyford & family


Court of Chancery

C 10/473/33 Chaplin, Knight, Reekford, Moddiford, Bragg, Orgill & Duck v. Bludworth, knight, Chappell, Dike, Feilder, Birkett, and others: Middx 1670


Sir Martin Noell & family


Court of Chancery

C 6/36/77 Short title: Upton v Noell. Plaintiffs: Hugh Upton. Defendants: Sir Martin Noell kt and others. Subject: real estate and personal estate Sir Martin Noell kt, of London. Document type: bill, answer. 1668
C 6/106/112 Short title: Noell v Wingfeild. Plaintiffs: Martin Noell. Defendants: Thomas Wingfield. Subject: rectory of Wethersfield, Essex. Document type: bill, answer. 1640
C 6/147/80 Short title: Maxey v Noell. Plaintiffs: Nathaniel Maxey. Defendants: Martin Noell, George Blake and Anthony Phelpes. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, demurrer. 1660
C 6/147/168 Short title: Walker v Noell. Plaintiffs: John Walker. Defendants: Martin Noell, Hugh Upton, John Upton and Gilbert Upton. Subject: office of collector of the excise on salt in Middlesex. Document type: bill, two answers. 1660
C 6/157/121 Short title: Oxinden v Noell. Plaintiffs: Sir George Oxinden kt and Jane Noke widow. Defendants: Martin Noell, Edward Backwell and James Clitheroe. Subject: money matters. Document type: answer only. 1661
C 6/159/3 Short title: Amcotts v Perry. Plaintiffs: Vincent Amcotts, William Amcotts, Vincent Lawson and Mary Lawson his wife. Defendants: Augustine Perry, Martin Noell and Hugh Upton. Subject: property in Amcotts, Lincolnshire. Document type: two bills, two demurrers, four answers. 1661
C 6/161/74 Short title: Noell v Lockhart. Plaintiffs: Sir Martin Noell kt. Defendants: William Lockhart, William Wildigos and John Ashurst. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, two answers. 1663
C 9/229/52 Noell v. Dallison 1665
C 10/78/15 Croxton v. Noell, knight, Gerrard, Minshall, Mead, and others: Ches. 1665
C 10/79/19 Croxton v. Noell, knight. 1665
C 10/109/63 Hewett v. Watts, Bushell, Noell, Bonnell, Rastall, Bicknell: Middx 1663
C 10/469/169 Vincent Lawson clerk v Augustine Perry, Sir Martin Noell knight, Hugh Upton, John Upton and Gilbert Upton: Amcott, Lincolnshire. Bill only 1664
C 10/473/135 Noell and Backhouse v. Browne: Middx 1663
C 10/470/103 Oxinden and Noke v. Noell, Throckmorton, Job, Delboe, Pearle, Bretton and others: Middx 1662
C 10/51/11 Bushell v. Vyner, Leake, Noell: Middx 1659
C 10/55/132 Noell, Underwood, Delboe and Taylor v. White and Watkins: Middx 1657
C 22/683/35 Noell v. Tomlin Between 1558 and 1714


William Noke & family


Court of Chancery


Edward Pearce & family


Court of Chancery

Thomas Pearle & family


Court of Chancery

C 5/44/70 Pearle v. Williams: Middlesex. 1664
C 6/163/68 Short title: Oxinden v Love. Plaintiffs: George Oxinden and Jane Noke widow. Defendants: William Love, Thomas Pearle, Thomas Bretton, Simon Delboe and Edward Peirce. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, answer, replication. 1663
C 9/26/18 Baker v. Smyth and Pearle 1660
C 9/22/37 Cocke v. Pearle 1660
C 9/228/51 Cock v. Pearle 1659
C 10/75/11 Bulmer, Pearle V. Gerard, Bonnell, Radcliffe: Middx 1664
C 10/178/34 Cocke v. Pearle: Middx. 1660
C 10/87/49 William Lore, Thomas Breton, Thomas Pearle, Simon Delboe, Edward Peirce, James Clitherow and others v Sir George Oxinden knight and Thomas Atkins: money matters, Middlesex. Bill and demurrer 1668
C 10/100/90 Frances Long widow v Sir Andrew Riccard knight, Henry Hunter, Thomas Pearle and others: money matters. Bill and answer 1664
C 10/173/72 William Love, Thomas Breton, Thomas Pearle, Simon Delboe, Edward Pearce, James Clitherow and others v Sir Henry Oxinden knight and James Oxinden: money matters, Middlesex. Bill and answer 1670
C 10/470/103 Oxinden and Noke v. Noell, Throckmorton, Job, Delboe, Pearle, Bretton and others: Middx 1662
C 10/60/30 William Love, Thomas Bretton, Thomas Pearle, Simon Delboe, Martin Nowell, Francis Dashwood and others v George Oxinden, Jane Noke widow and Elizabeth Dalison: money matters, Middlesex. Bill and answer 1660


William Pennoyer & family


Court of Chancery

C 2/ChasI/A13/69 Short title: Andrews v Pennoyer. Plaintiff: Andrews. Defendant: Pennoyer and others. Document type: [Bill and answer or answers]. Between 1625 and 1660
C 3/456/96 Short title: Pennoyer v Goff. Plaintiffs: William Pennoyer. Defendants: Lawrence Goff and others. Subject: money matters in Middlesex. Document type: [pleadings]. 1642-1660
C 6/8/78 Short title: Glover v Pennoyer. Plaintiffs: Rebecca Glover and others. Defendants: William Pennoyer. Subject: money matters.Document type: answer only. sfp 1646
C 6/150Pt2/75 Short title: Pennoyer v White. Plaintiffs: William Pennoyer. Defendants: Elizabeth White. Subject: manor of Acton, Middlesex. Document type: bill, answer. 1650
C 10/74/1 Roger Andrewes, John Connis, William Pennoyer, Francis Dashwood and Edward Crispe v Frederick Skinner: money matters, Middx 1664
C 10/35/57 Conway v. Ayleworth, Pennoyer, Pennoyer, Borneford, Somersley & Cranmer: warw. 1655
C 10/74/1 Roger Andrewes, John Connis, William Pennoyer, Francis Dashwood and Edward Crispe v Frederick Skinner: mones matters, Middx.

  • 1664 ORDERED 12/08/11 13.57 Viewed briefly

C 10/3/118 William Penoyer v Laurence Brinley and [...] Bull: money matters, Middx 1649
C 9/6/131 Lawrence v. Penoyer 1651


=Daniel Pennington


Court of Chancery


Samuel Pixley & family


Court of Chancery

C 9/24/39 Cocke v. Pixley 1661
C 9/24/48 Cocke v. Pixley 1661
C 9/24/47 Cocke v. Pixley 1661
C 9/26/40 Cock v. Pixley 1661
C 9/228/178 Pixley v. Cock 1661
C 9/409/267 Pixley v. Cock 1662
C 10/99/150 Pixley v Cocke 1663
C 22/237/44 Cox v Pixley. Between 1558 and 1714


Sir Thomas Rich


Court of Chancery


Abraham Sayon & family


Court of Chancery

C 10/65/99 Oxinden and Noke v. Sayon 1662


Sir George Smith


Court of Chancery


Henry Spurstow & family


Court of Chancery


Richard Turgis & family


Court of Chancery


Nicholas Read


Court of Chancery


Sir Andrew Riccard


Court of Chancery

C 10/19/66 Robert Levett v Jacob Searle, Nicholas Gould, Robert Abdy, William Williams, Andrew Rickards, Nathan Wright and others: money matters, Middlesex. Bill and answer 1653 ORDERED 18/08/11 12.41


John White & family

Court of Chancery


William Williams


Court of Chancery

  1. ↑ G.F.Steckley (ed.), The letters of John Paige, London merchant, 1648-58 - London Record Society, vol. 21 (XXXX, XXXX), http://www.british-history.ac.uk/source.aspx?pubid=564, viewed 31/10/11

Retrieved from ‘http://www.marinelives.org/index.php?title=MRP:_Possible_new_primary_sources&oldid=5799’