MRP: Possible new primary sources
Contents
- 1 Possible new primary sources
- 1.1 Sir Robert Abdy & family
- 1.2 Edward Backwell
- 1.3 Sir Henry Barnard
- 1.4 Sir Thomas Bludworth & family
- 1.5 Thomas Bromfield & family
- 1.6 Edwin Browne & family
- 1.7 Thomas Burnell & family
- 1.8 James Clitherow & family
- 1.9 Robert Cranmer & family
- 1.10 Nicholas Cooke & family
- 1.11 William Cutler
- 1.12 Francis Dashwood & family
- 1.13 Simon Delboe & family
- 1.14 Sir Mathew Hollworthy & family
- 1.15 John Jolliffe & family
- 1.16 James Lane & family
- 1.17 Edward Lewis & family
- 1.18 Charles Longland & family
- 1.19 William Love
- 1.20 James Man(n) & family
- 1.21 William Meggs & family
- 1.22 Sir James Modyford & family
- 1.23 Sir Martin Noell & family
- 1.24 William Noke & family
- 1.25 Edward Pearce & family
- 1.26 Thomas Pearle & family
- 1.27 William Pennoyer & family
- 2 =Daniel Pennington
Possible new primary sources
Sir Robert Abdy & family
Court of Chancery
C 10/18/67 Jacobson v Cambell, Abdy, Dewitt and Hill: Notts 1653
C 10/19/66 Robert Levett v Jacob Searle, Nicholas Gould, Robert Abdy, William Williams, Andrew Rickards, Nathan Wright and others: money matters, Middlesex. Bill and answer 1653 ORDERED 18/08/11 12.41
C 10/33/37 Cambell & Abdy bart, v Massingbird, Andrewes, Eastwicke, Moyer, and others: Middx 1651
C 10/52/6 Robert Abdy and others v James Wych: money matters. Demurrer 1659
C 10/54/7 Robert Abdy, George Smith, Edward Kempe and others v James Wych: monexy matters. Answer 1659 (Document is unorderable)
C 22/915/25 Smith v Abdy baronet & others Between 1558 and 1714
Edward Backwell
Edward Backwell (b. c.1618, d.1683) was a prominent London goldsmith banker.
Court of Chancery
C 5/113/13 Backwell v. Povey: Middlesex 1694
C 5/117/5 Backwell v. Povey 1695
C 5/442/27 Backwell v. Hodgkins: Middlesex 1666
C 6/157/121 Short title: Oxinden v Noell. Plaintiffs: Sir George Oxinden kt and Jane Noke widow. Defendants: Martin Noell, Edward Backwell and James Clitheroe. Subject: money matters. Document type: answer only. 1661
C 6/187/22 Short title: Backwell v Lydcot. Plaintiffs: Edward Backwell. Defendants: Giles Lydcot. Subject: money matters. Document type: answer only. 1668
C 6/187/25 Short title: Backwell v Lydcote. Plaintiffs: Edward Backwell. Defendants: Giles Lydcote, Sir John Bankes baronet, Augustine Coronell, John Penrice and John Culling. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, five answers. 1668
C 6/189/12 Short title: Backwell v Tyringham. Plaintiffs: Edward Backwell. Defendants: William Tyringham, Joseph Radcliffe, John Walker, Alexander Hurlston, Humphrey Hurlston, Isaac Hurlston, Thomas Hurlston and others. Subject: manor of Tyringham, Buckinghamshire. Document type: bill, seven answers. 1669
C 6/215/63 Short title: Knipe v Backwell. Plaintiffs: Edward Knipe. Defendants: Edward Backwell. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, plea. 1674
C 6/220/12 Short title: Backwell v Maynard. Plaintiffs: Edward Backwell. Defendants: Edward Maynard and Thomas Rudyard. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, answer. 1676
C 6/220/13 Short title: Backwell v Huniades. Plaintiffs: Edward Backwell. Defendants: John Huniades and Thomas Rudyard. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, answer. 1676
C 6/588/48 Short title: Backwell v Backwell. First plaintiff: Backwell. Defendants: Backwell. Document type: bill only. [1649-1714]
C 9/30/10 Backwell v. Burridge 1672
C 9/241/143 C 9/241/143 1658
C 9/411/123 Squire v. Backwell 1667
C 10/154/15 Backwell v. Rivers, Hide, Wharton: Middx 1670
C 10/167/7 Backwell v. Squire: Middx 1667
C 10/108/28 Crumwell, knight, Chichley, Backwell & Wormell v. Russell, bart & Phillipps: 1668
C 10/155/38 Cutlere v. Ryder, knight, Cocke, Backwell & Herne: Middx. 1669
C 10/231/21 Exeter, Cranmer, Humble, Oxinden, Blackburne v. Backwell, Mountrey, Snagg, Morris: Middx 1689
C 10/478/58 Godden v. Tyringham and Backwell: Buckingham 1670
C 10/465/164 Jarrard v. Taylor, Backwell and Sherston: Middx 1657
C 10/72/88 Mary Leigh widow and Edward Backwell v Charles Kerr Earl of Ancram: copyhold held of the manor of Richmond, Surrey. Bill and answer 1663
C 10/90/77 Giles Lidcott v Edward Backwell: money matters. Answer 1669
C 10/103/94 William Lovett and Edward Backwell v Henry Toplady: money matters. Answer 1667
C 10/489/107 William Lovett and Edward Backwell v John Deboys and Charles Hearle: money matters, Middlesex. Bill only 1666
C 10/209/50 Mountney v Backwell, Whittingham, Dalton, Hind, Kirwood and others: Middlesex 1681
C 10/64/59 Pickering, Vyner and Backwell v. Tempest, Harris and others: Cambs 1661
C 10/112/35 Giles Lytcot v Edward Backwell: money matters, Middlesex. Bill and answer 1668
C 22/205/42 Wortley v. Backwell. 1683
C 22/588/16 Backwell v. Wortley. Between 1558 and 1714
E 133/94/64 Owen v Backwell Eliz. - Victoria
E 133/143/3 The Crown v. Backwell Eliz. - Victoria
E 134/25Chas2/East22 Thomas Bodly v. Sir John Shaw, Sir Robt. Viner, Sir Edmd. Emner, Edwd. Backwell, Fras. Millington.: Thos. Russell, appointed by defendants (farmers of H.M. Customs) collector of customs and subsidies in the port of Southampton. Touching his sureties, viz. 25 Chas 2
E 406/20 Backwell 1676-1701
E 407/8/179 A general account of the interest and allowances due by the king to Edward Backwell for loans advanced 1669 June 24
SP 46/97/fo 98-99 Warrant for payment of £6,210 to Edward Backwell, goldsmith, for his relinquishment of land at Hampton Court. Signed by Henry Lawrence, President of the Council. Backwell's receipt; 13 March 1653/4. 1653/4 Mar. 10
SP 46/102/22 Orders and warrants from council of state: to trustees for sale of king's, queen's and prince's lands to pay John Backwell £1,900 for his interest in part of Hampton Court. ff. 31, 32 1654 February 20
SP 89/12 The account as it stood when Parry took the collection over from Mr. Pollexfen, Alderman Backwell's deputy. 1671
AO 1/848/1 Roll 1 E. Backwell. 1662
Sir Henry Barnard
Court of Chancery
C 6/196/9 Short title: Barnard v Willoughby. Plaintiffs: HENRY Barnard. Defendants: Francis Willoughby, Emma Willoughby his wife and Francis Lacon. Subject: property in Ivington, Herefordshire. Document type: bill, answer. 1671
C 10/160/5 Sir Joseph Ash baronet v Christopher Dodsworth, Mary Dodsworth, Henry Barnard, Francis Mose and John Jewkes: Twickenham, Middx 1669
C 10/165/7 Sir John Ash baronet v Christopher Dodsworth, Mary Dodsworth widow, Henry Barnard, Francis Mose and John Jewkes: Twickenham, Middx. Answer 1669
Sir Thomas Bludworth & family
Court of Chancery
C 10/99/17 Brandon v. Gunn, Bludworth, Joliffe, Barnardiston 1662
C 10/66/37
C 10/473/33 Chaplin, Knight, Reekford, Moddiford, Bragg, Orgill & Duck v. Bludworth, knight, Chappell, Dike, Feilder, Birkett, and others: Middx 1670
C10/66/45
C 10/96/51 Dennis, Buckworth v. Gunn, Bludworth, Joliffe, Barnardiston
C 10/66/78
(and a few more)
Thomas Bromfield & family
Edwin Browne & family
Court of Chancery
Thomas Burnell & family
Court of Chancery
James Clitherow & family
Court of Chancery
Robert Cranmer & family
Court of Chancery
C 10/72/23 Bornfold v. Andrewes, Winter, Edwards, Cranmer, Tomlins: Middx 1661
C 10/35/57 Conway v. Ayleworth, Pennoyer, Borneford, Somersley & Cranmer: Warw. 1655
C 10/98/2 Thomas Andrewes, Thomas Winter, James Edwards and Thomas Tomlyns v Jane Bornford and Robert Cranmer: money matters, Middx 1663
Nicholas Cooke & family
Court of Chancery
William Cutler
Court of Chancery
C 5/407/169 Cutler v. Alleyn: Middlesex 1664
C 5/468/109 Cutler v. Howland: Middlesex 1670
C 5/468/111 Cutler v. Justice: Middlesex 1669
C 5/54/40 Ford v. Cutler 1668
C 5/24/62 Pride v. Cutler: Middlesex. 1652
C 5/404/285 Robinson v. Cutler 1647
C 5/53/78 Sowton v. Cutler: Middlesex. 1669
C 6/218/65 Short title: Sowton v Cutler. Plaintiffs: Samuel Sowton. Defendants: Thomas Cutler and David Clarke. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, two answers, three schedules. 1676
C 6/227/80 Short title: Sowton v Westland. Plaintiffs: Samuel Sowton. Defendants: Oliver Westland and Thomas Cutler. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, plea. 1677
C 6/584/205 Short title: Warren v Cutler. First plaintiff: Warren. Defendants: Cutler. Document type: bill only. [1649-1714]
C 6/597/21 Short title: Cutler v Colvel. First plaintiff: Cutler. Defendants: Colvel. Document type: bill only. [1649-1714]
C 6/602/75 Short title: Cutler v Howland. First plaintiff: Cutler. Defendants: Howland. Document type: bill only. [1649-1714]
C 9/9/21 Cutler v. Wynard 1652
- Is "Wynard" a TNA transcription error for "Maynard"?
C 9/27/57 Elliott v. Orlibeare and Cutler 1662
C 9/410/111 Rich v. Cutler 1656
C 10/472/21 Browne v. Cutler: Middx 1667
C 10/472/22 Browne v. Cutler: Middx 1667
C 10/74/18 Cutler v. Parkhurst, knight, Abdy, bart, Maynard, knight, Stowell & Mills: Middx. 1663
C 10/98/19 Cutler v. Page: Middx. 1663
- Have checked John Page letters (BHOL) for references to Cutler, but the published Paige letters are only for the years 1648-1658.[1]
C 10/155/38 Cutlere v. Ryder, knight, Cocke, Backwell & Herne: Middx. 1669
- See Transcriptions C10/155/38 f. 1, C10/155/38 f. 2, C10/155/38 f. 3
C 10/158/28 Cutler & Goodwin v. Travers & Howland: Middx. 1670
C 10/73/45 Everard v. Cutler: Middx 1663
C 10/472/96 Heath v. Cutler, Morris, Cleyton, Stampe, Yates, Chapman and Beddard: Ireland 1667
C 10/108/85 Keate v. Cutler: Middx 1664
C 10/475/162 John Lloyd v William Cutler, Jeremy Carter and William Gomeldon: St. Peter le Poer, London, Middlesex. Bill only 1670
C 10/470/94 Maynard v Colvile, Portman, Cutler, Royle and Bradford: Middlesex 1670
C 10/72/122 Page v. Cutler: Middx 1661
C 10/53/22 Billingsley v. Foote, Cutler: Middx 1659
C 10/59/39 Cutler v. Copping: Middx. 1660
C 22/597/10 Bathurst v. Cutler. Between 1558 and 1714
Francis Dashwood & family
Court of Chancery
C 10/74/1 Roger Andrewes, John Connis, William Pennoyer, Francis Dashwood and Edward Crispe v Frederick Skinner: mones matters, Middx.
Simon Delboe & family
Court of Chancery
Sir Mathew Hollworthy & family
Court of Chancery
C 3/447/151 Short title: Holworthy v Holworthy. Plaintiffs: Mary Holworthy widow. Defendants: Matthew Holworthy and others. Subject: money matters in Gloucestershire. Document type: [pleadings]. SFP 1642-1660
C 5/410/122 Holworthy v. Wych: Middlesex. 1654
C 5/410/123 Holworthy v. Drawater: Middlesex. 1659
C 5/381/131 Lounce v. Holworthy 1651
C 5/386/97 Launce v. Holworthy 1651
C 10/59/16 Bolle, Andrewed, Modyford, Holworthy, Dawes v. Canham, Thompson, Rives, Bellamy: Middx 1669
C 22/370/57 Holworthy v Dethyck. Between 1558 and 1714
E 134/3&4Chas1/Hil3 Sir William Waller, knight, Abell Kitchen, John Guy, Richard Holworthy v. Francis Derrick, Edward Ballhashe.: Prisage of wines coming to the Port of Bristol from St. Mallowes (St. Malo), in the year 1626. Of what vintage? &c., &c.: Bristol 3 & 4 Chas 1
John Jolliffe & family
Court of Chancery
C 10/99/17 Brandon v. Gunn, Bludworth, Joliffe, Barnardiston 1662
C 10/96/51 Dennis, Buckworth v. Gunn, Bludworth, Joliffe, barnardiston
James Lane & family
Court of Chancery
Edward Lewis & family
Court of Chancery
Charles Longland & family
Court of Chancery
William Love
Court of Chancery
C 10/178/71
C 10/185/51
C 10/185/52
C 22/803/34
C 22/803/14
C 22/803/47
James Man(n) & family
Court of Chancery
William Meggs & family
Court of Chancery
C 10/57/109 Gore, Woodward and Meggs v. East India company, Governor &c. and others 1652
Sir James Modyford & family
Court of Chancery
C 10/473/33 Chaplin, Knight, Reekford, Moddiford, Bragg, Orgill & Duck v. Bludworth, knight, Chappell, Dike, Feilder, Birkett, and others: Middx 1670
Sir Martin Noell & family
Court of Chancery
C 6/36/77 Short title: Upton v Noell. Plaintiffs: Hugh Upton. Defendants: Sir Martin Noell kt and others. Subject: real estate and personal estate Sir Martin Noell kt, of London. Document type: bill, answer. 1668
C 6/106/112 Short title: Noell v Wingfeild. Plaintiffs: Martin Noell. Defendants: Thomas Wingfield. Subject: rectory of Wethersfield, Essex. Document type: bill, answer. 1640
C 6/147/80 Short title: Maxey v Noell. Plaintiffs: Nathaniel Maxey. Defendants: Martin Noell, George Blake and Anthony Phelpes. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, demurrer. 1660
C 6/147/168 Short title: Walker v Noell. Plaintiffs: John Walker. Defendants: Martin Noell, Hugh Upton, John Upton and Gilbert Upton. Subject: office of collector of the excise on salt in Middlesex. Document type: bill, two answers. 1660
C 6/157/121 Short title: Oxinden v Noell. Plaintiffs: Sir George Oxinden kt and Jane Noke widow. Defendants: Martin Noell, Edward Backwell and James Clitheroe. Subject: money matters. Document type: answer only. 1661
C 6/159/3 Short title: Amcotts v Perry. Plaintiffs: Vincent Amcotts, William Amcotts, Vincent Lawson and Mary Lawson his wife. Defendants: Augustine Perry, Martin Noell and Hugh Upton. Subject: property in Amcotts, Lincolnshire. Document type: two bills, two demurrers, four answers. 1661
C 6/161/74 Short title: Noell v Lockhart. Plaintiffs: Sir Martin Noell kt. Defendants: William Lockhart, William Wildigos and John Ashurst. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, two answers. 1663
C 9/229/52 Noell v. Dallison 1665
C 10/78/15 Croxton v. Noell, knight, Gerrard, Minshall, Mead, and others: Ches. 1665
C 10/79/19 Croxton v. Noell, knight. 1665
C 10/109/63 Hewett v. Watts, Bushell, Noell, Bonnell, Rastall, Bicknell: Middx 1663
C 10/469/169 Vincent Lawson clerk v Augustine Perry, Sir Martin Noell knight, Hugh Upton, John Upton and Gilbert Upton: Amcott, Lincolnshire. Bill only 1664
C 10/473/135 Noell and Backhouse v. Browne: Middx 1663
C 10/470/103 Oxinden and Noke v. Noell, Throckmorton, Job, Delboe, Pearle, Bretton and others: Middx 1662
C 10/51/11 Bushell v. Vyner, Leake, Noell: Middx 1659
C 10/55/132 Noell, Underwood, Delboe and Taylor v. White and Watkins: Middx 1657
C 22/683/35 Noell v. Tomlin Between 1558 and 1714
William Noke & family
Court of Chancery
Edward Pearce & family
Court of Chancery
Thomas Pearle & family
Court of Chancery
C 5/44/70 Pearle v. Williams: Middlesex. 1664
C 6/163/68 Short title: Oxinden v Love. Plaintiffs: George Oxinden and Jane Noke widow. Defendants: William Love, Thomas Pearle, Thomas Bretton, Simon Delboe and Edward Peirce. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, answer, replication. 1663
C 9/26/18 Baker v. Smyth and Pearle 1660
C 9/22/37 Cocke v. Pearle 1660
C 9/228/51 Cock v. Pearle 1659
C 10/75/11 Bulmer, Pearle V. Gerard, Bonnell, Radcliffe: Middx 1664
C 10/178/34 Cocke v. Pearle: Middx. 1660
C 10/87/49 William Lore, Thomas Breton, Thomas Pearle, Simon Delboe, Edward Peirce, James Clitherow and others v Sir George Oxinden knight and Thomas Atkins: money matters, Middlesex. Bill and demurrer 1668
C 10/100/90 Frances Long widow v Sir Andrew Riccard knight, Henry Hunter, Thomas Pearle and others: money matters. Bill and answer 1664
C 10/173/72 William Love, Thomas Breton, Thomas Pearle, Simon Delboe, Edward Pearce, James Clitherow and others v Sir Henry Oxinden knight and James Oxinden: money matters, Middlesex. Bill and answer 1670
C 10/470/103 Oxinden and Noke v. Noell, Throckmorton, Job, Delboe, Pearle, Bretton and others: Middx 1662
C 10/60/30 William Love, Thomas Bretton, Thomas Pearle, Simon Delboe, Martin Nowell, Francis Dashwood and others v George Oxinden, Jane Noke widow and Elizabeth Dalison: money matters, Middlesex. Bill and answer 1660
William Pennoyer & family
Court of Chancery
C 2/ChasI/A13/69 Short title: Andrews v Pennoyer. Plaintiff: Andrews. Defendant: Pennoyer and others. Document type: [Bill and answer or answers]. Between 1625 and 1660
C 3/456/96 Short title: Pennoyer v Goff. Plaintiffs: William Pennoyer. Defendants: Lawrence Goff and others. Subject: money matters in Middlesex. Document type: [pleadings]. 1642-1660
C 6/8/78 Short title: Glover v Pennoyer. Plaintiffs: Rebecca Glover and others. Defendants: William Pennoyer. Subject: money matters.Document type: answer only. sfp 1646
C 6/150Pt2/75 Short title: Pennoyer v White. Plaintiffs: William Pennoyer. Defendants: Elizabeth White. Subject: manor of Acton, Middlesex. Document type: bill, answer. 1650
C 10/74/1 Roger Andrewes, John Connis, William Pennoyer, Francis Dashwood and Edward Crispe v Frederick Skinner: money matters, Middx 1664
C 10/35/57 Conway v. Ayleworth, Pennoyer, Pennoyer, Borneford, Somersley & Cranmer: warw. 1655
C 10/74/1 Roger Andrewes, John Connis, William Pennoyer, Francis Dashwood and Edward Crispe v Frederick Skinner: mones matters, Middx.
- 1664 ORDERED 12/08/11 13.57 Viewed briefly
C 10/3/118 William Penoyer v Laurence Brinley and [...] Bull: money matters, Middx 1649
C 9/6/131 Lawrence v. Penoyer 1651
=Daniel Pennington
Court of Chancery
Samuel Pixley & family
Court of Chancery
C 9/24/39 Cocke v. Pixley 1661
C 9/24/48 Cocke v. Pixley 1661
C 9/24/47 Cocke v. Pixley 1661
C 9/26/40 Cock v. Pixley 1661
C 9/228/178 Pixley v. Cock 1661
C 9/409/267 Pixley v. Cock 1662
C 10/99/150 Pixley v Cocke 1663
C 22/237/44 Cox v Pixley. Between 1558 and 1714
Sir Thomas Rich
Court of Chancery
Abraham Sayon & family
Court of Chancery
C 10/65/99 Oxinden and Noke v. Sayon 1662
Sir George Smith
Court of Chancery
Henry Spurstow & family
Court of Chancery
Richard Turgis & family
Court of Chancery
Nicholas Read
Court of Chancery
Sir Andrew Riccard
Court of Chancery
C 10/19/66 Robert Levett v Jacob Searle, Nicholas Gould, Robert Abdy, William Williams, Andrew Rickards, Nathan Wright and others: money matters, Middlesex. Bill and answer 1653 ORDERED 18/08/11 12.41
John White & family
Court of Chancery
William Williams
Court of Chancery
- ↑ G.F.Steckley (ed.), The letters of John Paige, London merchant, 1648-58 - London Record Society, vol. 21 (XXXX, XXXX), http://www.british-history.ac.uk/source.aspx?pubid=564, viewed 31/10/11