HCA 13/71 f.441r Annotate

From MarineLives
Jump to: navigation, search
[Expand]

Expand this area to see details of page purpose, how to register, how to add footnotes, and useful links.

Image

HCA 13/71 f.441r: Right click on image for full size image in separate window

Transcription

To the third hee saith hee sawe the shipp Interrogate last on satterday last
at Wivenell aforesayd And further to this Interrogatorie hee cannot depose

To the 4th hee cannot answere./

To the 5th hee saith hee beleeveth that at the tyme off the seizure of the Edward
and John English goods were esteemed good prize to the Spaniards and
fflandrians And further saving his foregoeing deposition hee cannot
depose/

To the last hee saith it concerneth him not to answere thereto for that hee hath
not deposed touching the matter interrogate, nor ian hee answere anything thereto

Repeated before doctor Godolphin/

The marke of the sayd
Paule O Clements. [SIGNATURE, RH SIDE]

************************************

The 13th of december 1656/

Warner against the Alexander and against Howe
Budd smith

Examined upon an allegation given in on
the behalfe of the sayd Warner./

9

John White of London Merchant aged forty
one yeares or thereabouts sworne and examined saith
and deposeth as followeth videlicet/

To the fifth article of the sayd allegation hee saith that
the arlate Alexander howe during all the moneth of September 1653
was Commonly accompted a part Owner of the shipp the Alexander
and hee beleeveth him soe to bee for that the sayd Alexander howe within
the tyme aforesayd did confesse and acknowledge to this deponent that
hee was then a part owner of the sayd shipp And further hee cannot depose/

To the 6th article of the sayd allegation hee saith and deposeth that hee this
deponent is the arlate John White and that after the returne of the shipp
Alexander into England there happening some differences betweene the
arlate John Marston and Armiger Warner the same differences were referred
to the determination of him this deponent and the arlate Alexander howe
And hee saith that upon the sayd reference hee this deponent and the sayd
Alexander howe did publish and make the award or second schedule in this
article mentioned now shewed unto and perused by him this deponent at the
tyme of this his examination and did therein awarde and decree in all
things as in the sayd awarde is declared and saith that the sayd
awarde was and is subscribed by this deponent and the sayd Alexander
Howe and that hee very well knoweth that these names or words John
White and Alexander howe at the foote of the awarde arlate subscribed
and his And the sayd Alexander howes owne handwriting, and that the
sayd award was sealed published and delivered by this deponent and the sayd
Alexander howe according as in the same awarde is expressed and
that all things were soe had and done as in the sayd Award is conteyned
and that the contents of the sayd Award are true, And further hee cannot depose

To the rest of the articles of the sayd allegation hee is not examined
by direction of the producent Warner/

To the Interrogatorries/ [CENTRE HEADING]