Difference between revisions of "MRP: New work on primary documents"
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
C2/Eliz/D5/59 Max Dalison v John, lord bishop of Rochester | C2/Eliz/D5/59 Max Dalison v John, lord bishop of Rochester | ||
| − | C2/Eliz/D6/57 | + | C2/Eliz/D6/57 Dalison v bishop of Rochester Between 1558 and 1603 |
| + | |||
| + | C3/429/50 Stone v Dalison 1640-1642 | ||
C 9/232/127 Oxenden v. Midleton 1663 | C 9/232/127 Oxenden v. Midleton 1663 | ||
C 9/409/92 Oxenden v. Engham 1663 | C 9/409/92 Oxenden v. Engham 1663 | ||
| + | |||
| + | C 10/65/38 Dalison v. Browne, Bush 1662 | ||
| + | |||
| + | C 22/58/39 Dalyson v. Oxinder (sic) Between 1558 and 1714 | ||
---- | ---- | ||
Revision as of 16:46, September 6, 2011
New work on primary documents
The acquisition of primary documents involves imaging the documents digitally where possible, followed by their summary and possible transcription. Digital images are held offline, unless otherwise noted and the licence conditions with the holders of the original documents permit. Some summaries and transcriptions have been posted to this wiki as examples of document types.
Tuesday, 6th September 2011
Will of Charles Hoskins, Gentleman of Oxted, Surrey 27 January 1598 PROB 11/91 Lewyn 1 – 57
Will of Charles Hoskins of Oxted, Surrey 06 November 1657 PROB 11/269 Ruthen 411 – 461
Tuesday, 30th August 2011
C2/Eliz/D5/59 Max Dalison v John, lord bishop of Rochester
C2/Eliz/D6/57 Dalison v bishop of Rochester Between 1558 and 1603
C3/429/50 Stone v Dalison 1640-1642
C 9/232/127 Oxenden v. Midleton 1663
C 9/409/92 Oxenden v. Engham 1663
C 10/65/38 Dalison v. Browne, Bush 1662
C 22/58/39 Dalyson v. Oxinder (sic) Between 1558 and 1714
Thursday 18th August 2011
C 10/19/66 Robert Levett v Jacob Searle, Nicholas Gould, Robert Abdy, William Williams, Andrew Rickards, Nathan Wright and others: money matters, Middlesex. Bill and answer 1653
Friday, 12th August 2011
C 9/49/48 Dalison v. Oxenden 1667
C 9/40/58 Oxenden v. Dallison 1668
C 9/240/194 Stanley v. Walsall 1650
C 10/14/38 William Cane v Barnabas Walsall and Thomas Stanley: Rochester, Kent 1651
C 10/57/109 Gore, Woodward and Meggs v. East India company, Governor & c. and others 1652
C 10/74/1 Roger Andrewes, John Connis, William Pennoyer, Francis Dashwood and Edward Crispe v Frederick Skinner: mones matters, Middx. 1664
C 114/69 Accounts (household and personal) correspondence (Dutch and French), Probate of will of Charles Marescoe, of London. Lawyer’s charges. Account books (Dutch and French): Middx
Tuesday, 9th August 2011
C 9/40/57 Oxenden v. Dallison and Stanley 1668
C 9/243/66 Dallison v. Skipper and Smith 1666
