Difference between revisions of "MRP: Dallison family"
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | = Dallison family = | ||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | == Dalison primary sources of potential interest == | ||
+ | |||
+ | '''TNA''' | ||
+ | |||
+ | [http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/catalogue/displaycataloguedetails.asp?CATID=-2911670&CATLN=7&Highlight=%2CDALLISON&accessmethod=0&Summary=True - C 142/213/150] Dallison, William: Lincoln 29 Elizabeth | ||
+ | |||
+ | [http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/catalogue/displaycataloguedetails.asp?CATID=4809500&CATLN=6&Highlight=%2CDALLISON&accessmethod=0&Summary=True - C 5/385/25] Baker v. Dallison: Middlesex 1648 | ||
+ | |||
+ | [http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/catalogue/displaycataloguedetails.asp?CATID=4820223&CATLN=6&Highlight=%2CDALLISON&accessmethod=0&Summary=True - C 5/378/53] Dallison v. Pyndar: Middlesex. 1652 | ||
+ | |||
+ | [http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/catalogue/displaycataloguedetails.asp?CATID=5665660&CATLN=6&Highlight=%2CDALLISON&accessmethod=0&Summary=True - C 9/243/65] Dallison v. Emerson 1659 | ||
+ | |||
+ | [http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/catalogue/displaycataloguedetails.asp?CATID=5665665&CATLN=6&Highlight=%2CDALLISON&accessmethod=0&Summary=True - C 9/242/63] | ||
+ | Dallison v. Skepper 1658 | ||
+ | |||
+ | [http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/catalogue/displaycataloguedetails.asp?CATID=5665666&CATLN=6&Highlight=%2CDALLISON&accessmethod=0&Summary=True - C 9/243/66] Dallison v. Skipper and Smith 1666 | ||
+ | |||
+ | [http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/catalogue/displaycataloguedetails.asp?CATID=7685460&CATLN=6&Highlight=%2CDALLISON&accessmethod=0&Summary=True - C 10/465/150] Hele v. Dallison, Berkeley: Middlesex 1655 | ||
+ | |||
+ | [http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/catalogue/displaycataloguedetails.asp?CATID=7052968&CATLN=6&Highlight=%2CDALLISON&accessmethod=0&Summary=True - C 22/368/26] Hussey v Dallison. Between 1558 and 1714 | ||
+ | |||
+ | [http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/catalogue/displaycataloguedetails.asp?CATID=6522531&CATLN=6&Highlight=%2CDALLISON&accessmethod=0&Summary=True - E 115/127/180] Certificate of residence showing Sir Maximilian Dalison (or the variant surname: Dallison, Dalyson) to be liable for taxation in Middlesex, and not in the half-hundred of Shamwell, etc., Kent, the previous area of tax liability. (Any information not given in this certificate comes from its old pouch, no 2585. 1627-1628 | ||
+ | |||
+ | [http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/catalogue/displaycataloguedetails.asp?CATID=6522536&CATLN=6&Highlight=%2CDALLISON&accessmethod=0&Summary=True - E 115/123/103] Certificate of residence showing Sir Roger Dalison (or the variant surname: Dallison, Dalyson) to be liable for taxation in the Royal Household, and not in the wapentake of Manley, in the Parts of Lindsey, Lincolnshire, the previous area of tax liability. 1605-1606 | ||
+ | |||
+ | [http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/catalogue/displaycataloguedetails.asp?CATID=7328102&CATLN=6&Highlight=%2CDALISON&accessmethod=0&Summary=True -C 2/Eliz/D1/45] William Dalison and his wife Silvester, executrix of Robert Deane v John, lord bishop of Rochester. Bill to examine witnesses in support of title by lease. Lands in Snodland and Halling, Kent, held by divers leases from former bishops of Rochester. Short title: Dalyson v bishop of Rochester Between 1558 and 1603 | ||
+ | |||
+ | [http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/catalogue/displaycataloguedetails.asp?CATID=7328417&CATLN=6&Highlight=%2CDALISON%2CDALISON&accessmethod=0&Summary=True - C 2/Eliz/D6/57] Maximilian Dalison v John, lord bishop of Rochester, John Joye and William Wood. Bill for discovery of concealed estates. The manor of Halling in the parishes of Halling and Snodland, Kent, held under lease from the cathedral church of Rochester. Short title: Dalison v bishop of Rochester Between 1558 and 1603 | ||
+ | |||
+ | [http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/catalogue/displaycataloguedetails.asp?CATID=4682027&CATLN=6&Highlight=%2CDALISON%2CDALISON&accessmethod=0&Summary=True - C 3/267/38] Short title: Dalison v Finch. Plaintiffs: Sir Maximillian Dalison kt. Defendants: John Finch and others. Subject: property in Snodland, Kent. Document type: [pleadings]. 1596-1616 | ||
+ | |||
+ | [http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/catalogue/displaycataloguedetails.asp?CATID=4696276&CATLN=6&Highlight=%2CDALISON%2CDALISON&accessmethod=0&Summary=True - C 3/429/50] Short title: Stone v Dalison. Plaintiffs: Thomas Stone. Defendants: William Dalison. Subject: property in Guilford, Sussex; and Chatham, Luddesdown, Heavibatch Snodland and Halling, Kent etc. Document type: answer only. 1640-1642 | ||
+ | |||
+ | * This case presumably involves William Dallison, Elizabeth Dallison's husband, who was in financial trouble, and who had in 1639 assigned the lease for the Bishops place, lands and premises for the residue and remainder of the term of 99 years to Sir James Oxinden in return for money to renew lease and for other purposes (see Sir Henry Oxinden's reply to Maximilian Dalyson's bill of complaint, C 9/49/48 Dalison v. Oxenden 1667) | ||
+ | |||
+ | [http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/catalogue/displaycataloguedetails.asp?CATID=6707531&CATLN=6&Highlight=%2CDALISON%2CDALISON&accessmethod=0&Summary=True - C 6/11/312] Short title: Dalison v Hall. Plaintiffs: William Dalison and others. Defendants: Charles Hall. Subject: property in Willingham, Lincolnshire, Reepham, Lincolnshire. Document type: bill only. 1654 | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Probably not related to Elizabeth Dallison and Oxenden family, although Elizabeth was involved ina Lincolnshire property transaction with her brother Sir George Oxenden in 16XX | ||
+ | |||
+ | [http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/catalogue/displaycataloguedetails.asp?CATID=7328102&CATLN=6&Highlight=%2CDALYSON&accessmethod=0&Summary=True - C 2/Eliz/D1/45] | ||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
== Sir Maximilian Dallison == | == Sir Maximilian Dallison == | ||
Revision as of 07:55, August 21, 2011
= Dallison family =
Contents
Dalison primary sources of potential interest
TNA
- C 142/213/150 Dallison, William: Lincoln 29 Elizabeth
- C 5/385/25 Baker v. Dallison: Middlesex 1648
- C 5/378/53 Dallison v. Pyndar: Middlesex. 1652
- C 9/243/65 Dallison v. Emerson 1659
- C 9/242/63
Dallison v. Skepper 1658
- C 9/243/66 Dallison v. Skipper and Smith 1666
- C 10/465/150 Hele v. Dallison, Berkeley: Middlesex 1655
- C 22/368/26 Hussey v Dallison. Between 1558 and 1714
- E 115/127/180 Certificate of residence showing Sir Maximilian Dalison (or the variant surname: Dallison, Dalyson) to be liable for taxation in Middlesex, and not in the half-hundred of Shamwell, etc., Kent, the previous area of tax liability. (Any information not given in this certificate comes from its old pouch, no 2585. 1627-1628
- E 115/123/103 Certificate of residence showing Sir Roger Dalison (or the variant surname: Dallison, Dalyson) to be liable for taxation in the Royal Household, and not in the wapentake of Manley, in the Parts of Lindsey, Lincolnshire, the previous area of tax liability. 1605-1606
-C 2/Eliz/D1/45 William Dalison and his wife Silvester, executrix of Robert Deane v John, lord bishop of Rochester. Bill to examine witnesses in support of title by lease. Lands in Snodland and Halling, Kent, held by divers leases from former bishops of Rochester. Short title: Dalyson v bishop of Rochester Between 1558 and 1603
- C 2/Eliz/D6/57 Maximilian Dalison v John, lord bishop of Rochester, John Joye and William Wood. Bill for discovery of concealed estates. The manor of Halling in the parishes of Halling and Snodland, Kent, held under lease from the cathedral church of Rochester. Short title: Dalison v bishop of Rochester Between 1558 and 1603
- C 3/267/38 Short title: Dalison v Finch. Plaintiffs: Sir Maximillian Dalison kt. Defendants: John Finch and others. Subject: property in Snodland, Kent. Document type: [pleadings]. 1596-1616
- C 3/429/50 Short title: Stone v Dalison. Plaintiffs: Thomas Stone. Defendants: William Dalison. Subject: property in Guilford, Sussex; and Chatham, Luddesdown, Heavibatch Snodland and Halling, Kent etc. Document type: answer only. 1640-1642
- This case presumably involves William Dallison, Elizabeth Dallison's husband, who was in financial trouble, and who had in 1639 assigned the lease for the Bishops place, lands and premises for the residue and remainder of the term of 99 years to Sir James Oxinden in return for money to renew lease and for other purposes (see Sir Henry Oxinden's reply to Maximilian Dalyson's bill of complaint, C 9/49/48 Dalison v. Oxenden 1667)
- C 6/11/312 Short title: Dalison v Hall. Plaintiffs: William Dalison and others. Defendants: Charles Hall. Subject: property in Willingham, Lincolnshire, Reepham, Lincolnshire. Document type: bill only. 1654
- Probably not related to Elizabeth Dallison and Oxenden family, although Elizabeth was involved ina Lincolnshire property transaction with her brother Sir George Oxenden in 16XX
Sir Maximilian Dallison
Sources
William Dallison
Sources
Elizabeth Dallison
Sources
Maximilian Dallison
Sources