Difference between revisions of "HCA 13/72 f.522v Annotate"

Latest revision as of 16:56, November 25, 2015

The MarineLives transcription platform is built on MediaWiki, which uses wiki markup to format text. For a guide showing how to produce italics, bold, escaped text and headings, see the MediaWiki page on formatting; there are also guides for internal and external links, image embedding, tables, and more on lists.

Adding footnotes

Go into edit mode
Insert immediately after the sentence or phrase you wish to annotate the following macro:<ref>This is the footnote text</ref>
Replace 'This is the footnote text' with the footnote you wish to add, using the format: first name, surname, title, (place of publication, date of publication), page or folio number
Save the page

For more information and advanced formatting, including how to add and format links within the footnote, see the Wikipedia help on footnotes. This uses the same markup formatting.

Example footnote template:

''HCA 13/XX f.XXXX Case: XXXX; Deposition: XXXX; Date: XXXX. Transcribed by XXXX''<ref>[http://XXXXX Electronic link to a digital source]</ref>

Image

HCA 13/72 f.522v: Right click on image for full size image in separate window

Transcription

To the 5th and 6th articles hee saith that Brampton the Master of the Olive
Branch being come up with his sayd shipp to the dutch Admirall
went aboard the Admirall with purpose (as hee declared before this
deponent and others after hee came againe from aboard the Admirall
to his owne Shipp the Olive Branch) to get leave for the Olive Branch
to passe into Bantam Roade to take in her ladeing and earnestly
pressed him (as hee sayd) to permitt him soe to doe, and gave him
some presents thereby to induce him to get leave which notwith=
standing the sayd dutch Admirall (as the sayd Brampton affirmed
after hee came back aboard the Olive Branch) refused utterly to do[?e]
and sayd flattly that the sayd shipp should not passe into Bantam
whereupon the sayd Brampton seeing hee could not prevaile with the
Admirall to get leave to goe into Bantam with his says hipp
the Olive Branch sett sayle with her for Battavia a place in the
East Indies under command of the hollanders and where the
Generall of all their foorces had his residence, intending as
hee sayd to sollicite him for leave for the sayd shipp to goe into
Bantam, and at the sayd shipps coming to Battavia hee saith the
arlate Mr ffrederick Skinner (an Agent for the English at Bantam)
was there, and the sayd Skinner being told that the Olive Branch
came thither to get leave of the Generall to goe into bantam the
sayd Skinner in presence of this deponent and other of the Company
of the Olive Branch sayd that it was to noe purpose to move the
Generall therein for hee the sayd Skinner had bin with
the sayd Generall to get leave for a shipp called the Endimion who
wanted only a smale part of her ladeing , to goe in to Bantam there
to take it in and that the Generall utterly refused to grannt any
such leave and sayd neither shee nor any other English shipp
should goe into Bantam, by which words of the sayd Skinner the
Master and company of the Olive Branch perceiving that there was little
good to be done by staying at Battavia went thence againe toward
Bantam with intente to get in thither if they could but at this
coming neere Bantam the foresayd dutch shipps having espied
her and the Endimion who was alsoe in company with
hee weighed Anchor and came up to them and anchored about
them and told the Masters of the Olive Branch and Endimion that
they must not nor should goe into Bantam and thereupon the
Olive Branch and Endimion did not nor could goe into Bantam
This hee knoweth being Purser of the Olive Branch and an Eye and Eare wittnesse of
the premisses And further hee cannot depose./

To the 7th and 8th hee saith that the Master and Company of the
Olive Branch by reason they were as aforesayd hindered of
goeing

Sources

Primary sources

TNA

Chancery

C 5/432/18 Short title: Skinner v Crispe. Plaintiffs: Frederick Skinner. Defendants: Edward Crispe and another. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: answer. 1668

C 10/74/1 Roger Andrewes, John Connis, William Pennoyer, Francis Dashwood and Edward Crispe v Frederick Skinner: money matters, Middx. 1664
C 10/86/2 Thomas Andrewes, Daniel Skinner, Frederick Skinner and Francis Gardener v Albertus Skinner and Martin Skinner: money matters, Middx. 1668

PROB

PROB 4/11582 Skinner, Frederick, of All Hallows in the Wall, London ob. beyond the seas [goods left unadmd. by Daniel Skinner, son and admr., also since dead]
1685 21 Feb. [sic]

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 |Folio=522
 |Side=Verso
-|Status=First cut transcription started and completed on 03/11/13 by Colin Greenstreet
+|Status=Uploaded image; transcribed on 03/11/2013
 |First transcriber=Colin Greenstreet
+|First transcribed=2013/11/03
-|First transcribed=13/11/03
+|Note=IMAGE: IMG_121_11_5373.JPG
+}}
-|Editorial history=Created 03/11/13, by CSG
+{{PageHelp}}
-}}{{PageHelp}}
 {{PageTranscription
-|Transcription image=P1160707
+|Transcription image={{#transcription-image: IMG_121_11_5373.JPG}}
+|Transcription=To the 5th and 6th articles hee saith that Brampton the Master of the ''Olive''
-|Transcription=To the 5th and 6th articles hee saith that Brampton the Master of the ''Olive
+''Branch'' being come up with his sayd shipp to the dutch Admirall
-Branch'' being come up with his sayd shipp to the dutch Admirall
 went aboard the Admirall with purpose (as hee declared before this
 deponent and others after hee came againe from aboard the Admirall
 to his owne Shipp the ''Olive Branch'') to get leave for the ''Olive Branch''
-to passe into Bantam Roade to take in her le=adeing and earnestly
+to passe into Bantam Roade to take in her ladeing and earnestly
-pressed him (as hee sayd) to permitt him soe to doe
+pressed him (as hee sayd) to permitt him soe to doe, and gave him
+some presents thereby to induce him to get leave which notwith=
+standing the sayd dutch Admirall (as the sayd Brampton affirmed
+after hee came back aboard the ''Olive Branch'') refused  utterly to do&#91;?e&#93;
+and sayd flattly that the sayd shipp should not passe into Bantam
+whereupon the sayd Brampton seeing hee could not prevaile with the
+Admirall to get leave to goe into Bantam with his says hipp
+the ''Olive Branch'' sett sayle with her for Battavia a place in the
+East Indies under command of the hollanders and where the
+Generall of all their foorces had his residence, intending as
+hee sayd to sollicite him for leave for the sayd shipp to goe into
+Bantam, and at the sayd shipps coming to Battavia hee saith the
+arlate Mr ffrederick Skinner (an Agent for the English at Bantam)
+was there, and the sayd Skinner being told that the ''Olive Branch''
+came thither to get leave of the Generall to goe into bantam the
+sayd Skinner in presence of this deponent and other of the Company
+of the ''Olive Branch'' sayd that it was to noe purpose to move the
+Generall therein for hee the sayd Skinner had bin with
+the sayd Generall to get leave for a shipp called the ''Endimion'' who
+wanted only a smale part of her ladeing , to goe in to Bantam there
+to take it in and that the Generall utterly refused to grannt any
+such leave and sayd neither shee nor any other English shipp
+should goe into Bantam, by which words of the sayd Skinner the
+Master and company of the ''Olive Branch'' perceiving that there was little
+good to be done by staying at Battavia went thence againe toward
+Bantam with intente to get in thither if they could but at this
+coming neere Bantam the foresayd dutch shipps having espied
+her and the ''Endimion'' who was alsoe in company with
+hee weighed Anchor and came up to them and anchored about
+them and told the Masters of the ''Olive Branch'' and ''Endimion'' that
+they must not nor should goe into Bantam and thereupon the
+''Olive Branch'' and ''Endimion'' did not nor could goe into Bantam
+This hee knoweth being Purser of the ''Olive Branch'' and an Eye and Eare wittnesse of
+the premisses And further hee cannot depose./
+To the 7th and 8th hee saith that the Master and Company of the
+''Olive Branch'' by reason they were as aforesayd hindered of
+goeing
+|Primary sources='''TNA'''
+<u>Chancery</u>
+C 5/432/18 Short title: Skinner v Crispe. Plaintiffs: Frederick Skinner. Defendants: Edward Crispe and another. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: answer. 1668
+C 10/74/1 Roger Andrewes, John Connis, William Pennoyer, Francis Dashwood and Edward Crispe v Frederick Skinner: money matters, Middx. 1664
+C 10/86/2 Thomas Andrewes, Daniel Skinner, Frederick Skinner and Francis Gardener v Albertus Skinner and Martin Skinner: money matters, Middx. 1668
+<u>PROB</u>
+PROB 4/11582 Skinner, Frederick, of All Hallows in the Wall, London ob. beyond the seas [goods left unadmd. by Daniel Skinner, son and admr., also since dead]
+21 Feb. [sic]
 }}

Status
Volume	HCA 13/72
Folio	522
Side	Verso
← Previous Page Next Page →
Uploaded image; transcribed on 03/11/2013
Languages

Note
IMAGE: IMG_121_11_5373.JPG
First transcriber
Colin Greenstreet
First transcribed
2013/11/03
Editorial history
unknown

Difference between revisions of "HCA 13/72 f.522v Annotate"

Latest revision as of 16:56, November 25, 2015

Contents

Image

Transcription

Sources

Primary sources

Navigation menu

Search