Difference between revisions of "MRP: John Letten will"

From MarineLives
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 37: Line 37:
 
----
 
----
 
===Possible primary sources===
 
===Possible primary sources===
 +
 +
'''TNA'''
 +
 +
'''C 6/36/21 Short title: Cock v Letten. Plaintiffs: George Cock and John Fenn. Defendants: John Letten and another. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, answer, schedule. 1670'''
 +
'''C 6/201/21 Short title: Cocke v Letten. Plaintiffs: George Cocke and John Fenn. Defendants: John Letten. Subject: money matters. Document type: answer only. 1670'''
 +
'''C 6/209/92 Short title: Waynwright v Dashwood. Plaintiffs: James Waynwright. Defendants: Francis Dashwood, Nathaniel Letten, John Letten, Peter Kesterman and Chrisostom Hamilton. Subject: money matters, Surrey. Document type: bill, answer. 1671'''
  
 
PROB 11/147 Clarke 103-147 Will of Daniel Letten 25 November 1625
 
PROB 11/147 Clarke 103-147 Will of Daniel Letten 25 November 1625

Revision as of 20:15, December 12, 2011

John Letten will


Editorial history

04/12/11, CSG: Created page



Abstract & context




Suggested links


See Nathaniel Letten will
See C10/91/84 f. 1 (Bill of complaint of Nathaniel and John Letten vs. Charles Marescoe re. bill of exchange)
See C6/36/21 f. 1 (Bill of complaint exhibited in 1670 by George Cock vs John Letten & Thomas Hobart re. chartering of the William to Guinea and "Islands in America")
See C10/160/41 f. 1 (Bill of complaint exhibited in ?1671 by Daniel Gates vs. John Letten, the main owner of the Legorne Merchant, and ist captain, David Hamilton)



Transcription




To do




Commentary




Notes




Possible primary sources


TNA

C 6/36/21 Short title: Cock v Letten. Plaintiffs: George Cock and John Fenn. Defendants: John Letten and another. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, answer, schedule. 1670
C 6/201/21 Short title: Cocke v Letten. Plaintiffs: George Cocke and John Fenn. Defendants: John Letten. Subject: money matters. Document type: answer only. 1670
C 6/209/92 Short title: Waynwright v Dashwood. Plaintiffs: James Waynwright. Defendants: Francis Dashwood, Nathaniel Letten, John Letten, Peter Kesterman and Chrisostom Hamilton. Subject: money matters, Surrey. Document type: bill, answer. 1671

PROB 11/147 Clarke 103-147 Will of Daniel Letten 25 November 1625
PROB 11/184 Coventry 117-173 Will of John Letten, Hosier of Norwich, Norfolk 09 September 1640
PROB 11/370 Cottle 55-110 Will of Nathaniel Letten, Merchant of Saint Dionis Backchurch, City of London 15 August 1682
PROB 11/393 Exton 131-172 Will of John Letten, Mercht. of London 24 December 1688
PROB 11/411 Fane 147-194 Will of Nathaniel Letten, Merchant being now bound for the East Indies in the Ship Lancaster 22 September 1692
PROB 11/574 Shaller 98-147 Will of Richard Letten, Gentleman of London 04 May 1720