Tools: PROB 11/393/403 Will of John Letten, Mercht. of London 24 December 1688

From MarineLives
Jump to: navigation, search

PROB 11/393/403 Will of John Letten, Mercht. of London 24 December 1688


(PROB 11/393 Exton 131-172 Will of John Letten, Mercht. of London 24 December 1688)

Editorial history

04/12/11, CSG: Created page




Abstract & context



Suggested links


See PROB 11/370/455 Will of Nathaniel Letten, Merchant of Saint Dionis Backchurch 15 August 1682

See C10/91/84 f. 1 (Bill of complaint of Nathaniel and John Letten vs. Charles Marescoe re. bill of exchange)
See C6/36/21 f. 1 (Bill of complaint exhibited in 1670 by George Cock vs John Letten & Thomas Hobart re. chartering of the William to Guinea and "Islands in America")
See C10/160/41 f. 1 (Bill of complaint exhibited in ?1671 by Daniel Gates vs. John Letten, the main owner of the Legorne Merchant, and ist captain, David Hamilton)


Transcription



To do



Notes



Possible primary sources


TNA

Chancery cases involving John and/or Nathaniel Letten

C 5/585/65 Letten v. Hungeford: Middlesex. 1670
C 5/572/36 Wainwright v. Letten 1673

C 6/36/21 Short title: Cock v Letten. Plaintiffs: George Cock and John Fenn. Defendants: John Letten and another. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, answer, schedule. 1670
- See C6/36/21 f. 1 ((Bill of complaint exhibited in 1670 by George Cock vs John Letten & Thomas Hobart re. chartering of the William to Guinea and "Islands in America")
C 6/54/19 Short title: Letten v Harbord. Plaintiffs: Nathaniel Letten, Sir Edwyn Rich kt, Samuel Trotman and Edward Trotman. Defendants: William Harbord, Richard Newman, Roger Gillingham, William Gauntlett and Henry Rumsey. Subject: Durham House in St Martin in the Fields, Middlesex. 1670
C 6/199/62 Short title: Letten v Moresco. Plaintiffs: Nathaniel Letten and John Letten. Defendants: Leonora Moresco, Peter Joy and Thomas Townsend. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, demurrer. 1670
C 6/199/66 Short title: Letten v Townsend. Plaintiffs: Nathaniel Letten and John Letten. Defendants: Thomas Townsend. Subject: money matters. Document type: answer only. 1672
C 6/201/21 Short title: Cocke v Letten. Plaintiffs: George Cocke and John Fenn. Defendants: John Letten. Subject: money matters. Document type: answer only. 1670
C 6/201/81 Short title: Windsore v Gamlyn. Plaintiffs: Richard Windsore. Defendants: Hugh Gamlyn and Nathaniel Letten. Subject: property in St Martin in the Fields, Middlesex. Document type: bill, two answers. 1669
C 6/204/47 Short title: Pensax v Crosby. Plaintiffs: Daniel Pensax. Defendants: John Crosby, John Hammond, Thomas Becket, Nicholas Bradley, John Letten, Richard Winkle and others. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, answer. 1673
C 6/209/92 Short title: Waynwright v Dashwood. Plaintiffs: James Waynwright. Defendants: Francis Dashwood, Nathaniel Letten, John Letten, Peter Kesterman and Chrisostom Hamilton. Subject: money matters, Surrey. Document type: bill, answer. 1671
C 6/210/53 Short title: Letten v Bankes. Plaintiffs: John Letten. Defendants: John Bankes, Charles Bankes and William Gilbert. Subject: money matters, Middlesex. Document type: bill, answer. 1674
C 6/221/43 Short title: Goldsborough v Letten. Plaintiffs: Elizabeth Goldsborough, Alexander Goldsborough, Thomas Goldsborough and Nicholas Goldsborough. Defendants: Nathaniel Letten, Rowland Wynn, Richard Adams, Thomas Manley, Thomas Mills, John Looker and another. 1671

C 10/84/27 Hols v. Wynne, Letten, Peri, Adams, Looker: Lincs, Middx, Essex 1667
C10/91/84 f. 1 (Bill of complaint of Nathaniel and John Letten vs. Charles Marescoe re. bill of exchange)
C 10/106/106 Nathaniel Letten, Sir Edwin Riche knight, Samuel Trotman, Edward Trotman and others v William Harbord, Richard Newman and Roger Gillingham: St. Martin in the Fields, Middlesex. Answer 1667
C 10/122/67 John Letten v Daniel Pensaxe, John Crosseby, Richard Stephens, John Hamond, Nicholas Bradley and others: money matters, Middlesex. Bill and answer 1673
C 10/156/105 Nathaniel Letten and John Letten v Charles Maresco: money matters, Middlesex. Answer 1670
C 10/159/91 Nathaniel Letten, Peter Mathewes, Isaac Vinch and others v Sir Henry Cambell knight, Robert Sheffield and Dame Mary his wife, John Genew and Rachel his wife and Julius Coningsby: personal estate of Dame Rachel Cambell widow, deceased, of Clay Hall, Essex. 1671
C 10/158/95 Nathaniel Letten, Sir Edwin Rich knight, Samuel Trotman, Edward Trotman, Thomas Price, Amos Griggs and others v William Herbert Earl of Pembroke and Montgomery: St. Martin in the Fields, Middlesex. Demurrer 1671
C 10/158/98 Nathaniel Letten and others v William Herbert Earl of Pembroke and Montgomery, William Harbord, Richard Newman and others: St. Martin in the Fields, Middlesex. Answer 1670
C10/160/41 f. 1 (Bill of complaint exhibited in ?1671 by Daniel Gates vs. John Letten, the main owner of the Legorne Merchant, and ist captain, David Hamilton)
C 10/161/16 Child v. Coker, Bexly & Letten: Middx. 1671
C 10/163/67 Nathaniel Letten and John Letten v Peter Joy and Leonora Marescoe widow: money matters. Two answers 1671
C 10/165/70 Nathaniel Letten, Sir Edwin Rich knight, Samuel Trotman, Edward Trotman, Thomas Prince, Amos Grigg and others v William Herbert Earl of Pembroke and Montgomery, George Villiers Duke of Buckingham, John Pwalett Lord Pawlett, John Cosin Bishop of Durham, William Harbord and others: St. 1670
C 10/174/67 Nathaniel Letten, John Letten and Gerard Vanheithinson v John Palgrave and Diana his wife: Ebony manor and others, Kent. Bill and three answers 1673
C 10/177/57 Nathaniel Letten and John Letten v George Blackbourne: East Smithfield, Middlesex. Bill and answer 1674
C 10/182/43 Nathaniel Letten and others v William Cavendish Lord Cavendish: Ebony manor and others, Kent. Answer 1676
C 10/183/50 Nathaniel Letten and others v Thomas Browne: Ebony manor and others, Kent. Answer 1676
C 10/191/30 Huxley, Tryan and Hadley v. Trussell, Huxley, Letten, Ent: Southampton and Middlesex 1677
C 10/206/2 African v. Vyner, Bence, Letten: Middx 1679
C 10/272/48 Richard Letten, John Letten, Susannah Letten, Sarah Letten and Elizabeth Letten v John Letten: money matters, Middlesex. Bill and answer 1685
C 10/336/7 Baron v. Blanchard, Nichardson, Offley, Letten: Middx 1689
C 10/437/40 Anne Lant widow v Thomas Lant, Matthew Lant and John Lant: London, Lime Strut, Middlesex. Two bills and answer AND Thomas Lant, Matthew Lant and John Lant v Andrew Lant, Sir Stephen White knight, Christopher Boone, Nathaniel Letten, Richard Young, Rowland Wynn and others: Thorpe Underwood manor, Northamptonshire 1673 and 1674
C 10/471/6 Butler v. Vanheythuyson, Letten: Staffs 1669
C 10/475/165 Nathaniel Letten v William Jonas: Catteral, Lancashire. Bill only 1672
C 10/486/120 Nathaniel Letten, John Letten and Gerard Vanheithinson v John Palgrave and Diana his wife, William Cavendish Lord Cavendish, Sir Robert Clayton knight, John Morris and John Browne: money matters, Middlesex. Bill only 1673

C 111/185 PACKET 11: UNKNOWN CAUSES: Lease of George Barron, John Letten and Thomas Neale to Francis Ligoe of a bakehouse and other buildings in Ratcliff, Middx 1685

PROB

PROB 11/147 Clarke 103-147 Will of Daniel Letten 25 November 1625
PROB 11/184 Coventry 117-173 Will of John Letten, Hosier of Norwich, Norfolk 09 September 1640
PROB 11/370 Cottle 55-110 Will of Nathaniel Letten, Merchant of Saint Dionis Backchurch, City of London 15 August 1682
PROB 11/393 Exton 131-172 Will of John Letten, Mercht. of London 24 December 1688
PROB 11/411 Fane 147-194 Will of Nathaniel Letten, Merchant being now bound for the East Indies in the Ship Lancaster 22 September 1692
PROB 11/574 Shaller 98-147 Will of Richard Letten, Gentleman of London 04 May 1720

Retrieved from ‘http://www.marinelives.org/index.php?title=Tools:_PROB_11/393/403_Will_of_John_Letten,_Mercht._of_London_24_December_1688&oldid=68618’