Uploaded image; transcribed on 15/08/2013
And hee moreover deposeth that the said shipps the ''Advice'' and the ''dragon'' in case they had not bin soe XXXXXverd by the dutch and hindred and stopped from their trade at Bantam and other parts or those parts the said voyage, they might and in all probabilities would have brought home their respective ladings of Pepper, and that the ''Advice'' being of burthen as aforesaid, they were capable and might and would have taken in at Bantam (had not the said interruption happened) 11110?40 ''lb'' of Pepper which (as this deponent hath bin credibly informed) would there have bin bought and laded at three pence sterling per pound, the expence two pence per pound (making five per pound) and alsoe one tenth part of the [XXX?m]e for Algier duty makes the prime cost with charges of 11110?40 ''lb'' of Pepper amount to about 33979 ''li'' - 6 ''s'' - 1 ''d'' sterling, which Pepper hee saith would here have yeelded and bin worth twelve pence sterling per pound, which for the said quantitie amounting to about 55552 ''li'' sterling, hee saith that the said Prime cost and the said charges deducted, there remaineth about 21573 ''li'' - 13 ''s'' - 11 ''d'' sterling, in which summe the said English East India company is damnified, and further that by demourage of the said shipps a twelve moneth longer than otherwise they had needed or should have staid (had not the said abuse and hinderance bin donne by the dutch) at seaven pounds sterling per diem (according to Charterpartie) for the ''dragon'' amounteth to about 2555 ''li'' and for the ''Advice'' at eight pounds sterling per diem amounteth to about 2920 ''li'' sterling, makes the ?arlate dammage of the said English East India Company by the Premisses in his estimation amount unto the summe of 27048 ''li'' - 13 ''s'' - 11 ''d'', sterling, besides the dishonour redounding to the said company, and the whole English nation in the est[?eeme] of that part of the [?wor]ld seeing the dominion there exercised by the dutch over the English and their disappointing and disturbting ther trade at their pleasure, And further hee deposeth not Repeated before doctor Godolphin. Jo: XrangXX [SIGNATURE, RH SIDE] **************************** The 24th of September 1659 Touching the ''Mayflower'' aforesaid Examined upon the foresaid allegation. '''3''' '''Samuel Sambrooke''' of London Marchant aged 44 yeeres or therabouts and examined. To the first second, and the rest of the Articles of the said Allegation hee saith and deposeth, that he well knoweth the Arlate William Curtis who was master of the arlate shipp in question the XXXX and XXXXX, And also saith that in or About ffebruary or March the yeare of our Lord (according to the account used in England) one thousand six hundred fifty and seven, the honourable the Governour and Company of English Merchants trading to East India, [XXXX GUTTER] and Imployed the said shipp ''Mayflower'' upon a trading voyage from this Port of London to goe unto Acheen, in the Island of Sumatra (in the East Indias aforesaid) and there to lade in a lading of
[[File:P1110414.JPG|thumbnail|800px|none|link=Special:TranscriptionInterface/P1110414.JPG|[[:HCA 13/73|HCA 13/73]] f.301v: Right click on image for full size image in separate window
[[Parent volume::HCA 13/73]] [[Folio::301]] [[Side::Recto]]
HCA 13/73 f.301v Annotate# QUERY517fda47c14335a62f98c29be8c7f88d
[[Parent volume::HCA 13/73]] [[Folio::302]] [[Side::Recto]]
HCA 13/73 f.301v Annotate# QUERY398de3690dfdf98ce44401ced7622f38
HCA 13/73 f.301v Annotate# QUERYc3d33f12bfd0bfd77f8b27a0dc5f5658
HCA 13/73 f.301v Annotate# QUERY898a89f9c2cc67da357de25e85b6c9a9