Robert Adlington

From MarineLives
Revision as of 19:01, October 25, 2016 by ColinGreenstreet (Talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Banner}} {{SemBioLongInfoBoxThree |Person=Robert Adlington |First name=Robert |Last name=Adlington |Occupation=Lighterman |Training=Not apprentice |Citizen=Unknown |Literacy...")

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search



Robert Adlington
Person Robert Adlington
Title
First name Robert
Middle name(s)
Last name Adlington
Suffix
Spouse of
Widow of
Occupation Lighterman
Secondary shorebased occupation
Mariner occupation
Associated with ship(s)
Training Not apprentice
Is apprentice of
Was apprentice of
Had apprentice(s)
Citizen Unknown
Literacy Marke
Has opening text Robert Adlington
Has signoff text RA
Signoff image (Invalid transcription image)
Language skills English language
Has interpreter
Birth street
Birth parish
Birth town
Birth county
Birth province
Birth country
Res street
Res parish Saint Peter ad Vincula in the Tower
Res town London
Res county
Res province
Res country England
Birth year 1607
Marriage year
Death year
Probate date
First deposition age
Primary sources
Act book start page(s)
Personal answer start page(s)
Allegation start page(s)
Interrogatories page(s)
Deposition start page(s)
Chancery start page(s)
Letter start page(s)
Miscellaneous start page(s)
Act book date(s)
Personal answer date(s)
Allegation date(s)
Interrogatories date(s)
Deposition date(s) May 16 1657
How complete is this biography?
Has infobox completed Yes
Has synthesis completed No
Has HCA evidence completed No
Has source comment completed No
Ship classification
Type of ship Lighter
Silver Ship litigation in 1650s
Role in Silver Ship litigation None


Biographical synthesis

Robert Adlington (b. ca. 1607; d. ?). Lighterman.

Resided in 1657 in the parish of Saint Peter ad Vincula in the Tower.

Evidence from High Court of Admiralty

Fifty year old Robert Adlington deposed on May 16th 1657 in the High Court of Admiralty.[1] He was examined on a libel in the case of "Betts and others against the Prince".[2]

Comment on sources

  1. HCA 13/72 f.32r
  2. HCA 13/72 f.29v