William Hogg - Revision history

ColinGreenstreet at 18:38, November 1, 2016

2016-11-01T18:38:45Z

ColinGreenstreet at 17:56, November 1, 2016

2016-11-01T17:56:38Z

ColinGreenstreet: Created page with "{{Banner}} {{SemBioLongInfoBoxThree |Person=William Hogg |First name=William |Last name=Hogg |Occupation=Ropemaker |Mariner occupation=Belonged to the ship |Training=Not appre..."

2016-11-01T17:33:16Z

Created page with "{{Banner}} {{SemBioLongInfoBoxThree |Person=William Hogg |First name=William |Last name=Hogg |Occupation=Ropemaker |Mariner occupation=Belonged to the ship |Training=Not appre..."

New page

{{Banner}}
{{SemBioLongInfoBoxThree
|Person=William Hogg
|First name=William
|Last name=Hogg
|Occupation=Ropemaker
|Mariner occupation=Belonged to the ship
|Training=Not apprentice
|Citizen=Unknown
|Literacy=Signature
|Has opening text=William Hogg
|Has signoff text=William Hogg
|Transcription image={{#transcription-image: }}
|Language skills=English language,
|Res parish=Stepney
|Res county=Middlesex
|Res country=England
|Birth year=1637
|Deposition start page(s)=HCA 13/72 f.322r Annotate,
|Deposition date(s)=Apr 27 1658
|Has infobox completed=Yes
|Has synthesis completed=No
|Has HCA evidence completed=No
|Has source comment completed=No
|Type of ship=Shore based trade; merchant ship
|Role in Silver Ship litigation=None
}}
==Biographical synthesis==
William Hogg (b. ca. 1637; d. ?). Ropemaker.

Hogg described himself as a ropemaker, but had also been to sea, "sailing in company" in an unnamed ship in 1653 together with the ship the ''Edward'' of London.<ref>[[HCA 13/72 f.322r Annotate|HCA 13/72 f.322r]]</ref>

Resident in 1658 in the parish of Stepney.

==Evidence from High Court of Admiralty==
Twenty-one year old William Hogg deposed on April 27th 1658 in the High Court of Admiralty. He was examined on a libel on behalf of Edward Bartlet in the cause "Edward Bartlet against the ship called the ''Edward'' of London whereof Richard Stevens was master and against Richard Rooke and Company Interveyning for their interest".<ref>[[HCA 13/72 f.322r Annotate|HCA 13/72 f.322r]]</ref>

The case concerns the ship the ''Edward'' of London, of which Richard Stevens was masteer and commander until the time of his death.

William Hogg was familiar with the ship the ''Edward'', having sailed in another ship in her company in 1653.Hogg stated that the ship the ''Edward'' was in the River Thames fin early 1654, and wanted great repairing, and especially cable and cordage". Her captain, Richard Stevens, came to Edward Bartlet, a ropemaker "and desired him the said Bartlet, to furnish him with the same, for the use of the said ship".Hoogg testified that Bartlet "did furnish the said ship with all singular the cordage mentioned and Expressed in the schedule annexed to the said libell." Hogg had seen and carefully read the schedule and confirmed "it is of his this deponents handwriting, and was by him made and copyed out, of the said Bartletts. booke, And was and is true, and that all the said cordage was of the quality and quantity as in the said schedule is expressed, and were alsoe well worth the severall summes schedulate, and that they were then soe sommonly sold".<ref>[[HCA 13/72 f.322r Annotate|HCA 13/72 f.322r]]</ref> However, Edward Bartlet remained unpaid and had suffered "great losse and dammage, by not receiveing his principall, but knoweth not what to estimate the said damage at".<ref>[[HCA 13/72 f.322v Annotate|HCA 13/72 f.322v]]</ref>

==Comment on sources==

@@ Line 39: / Line 39: @@
 The case concerns the ship the ''Edward'' of London, of which Richard Stevens was masteer and commander until the time of his death.
-William Hogg was familiar with the ship the ''Edward'', having sailed in another ship in her company in 1653. Hogg stated that the ship the ''Edward'' was in the River Thames in early 1654, and wanted great repairing, and especially cable and cordage". Her captain, Richard Stevens, came to Edward Bartlet, a ropemaker "and desired him the said Bartlet, to furnish him with the same, for the use of the said ship".Hoogg testified that Bartlet "did furnish the said ship with all singular the cordage mentioned and Expressed in the schedule annexed to the said libell." Hogg had seen and carefully read the schedule and confirmed "it is of his this deponents handwriting, and was by him made and copyed out, of the said Bartletts. booke, And was and is true, and that all the said cordage was of the quality and quantity as in the said schedule is expressed, and were alsoe well worth the severall summes schedulate, and that they were then soe sommonly sold".<ref>[[HCA 13/72 f.322r Annotate|HCA 13/72 f.322r]]</ref> However, Edward Bartlet remained unpaid and had suffered "great losse and dammage, by not receiveing his principall, but knoweth not what to estimate the said damage at".<ref>[[HCA 13/72 f.322v Annotate|HCA 13/72 f.322v]]</ref>
+William Hogg was familiar with the ship the ''Edward'', having sailed in another ship in her company in 1653. Hogg stated that the ship the ''Edward'' was in the River Thames in early 1654, and wanted great repairing, and especially cable and cordage". Her captain, Richard Stevens, came to Edward Bartlet, a ropemaker "and desired him the said Bartlet, to furnish him with the same, for the use of the said ship". Hogg testified that Bartlet "did furnish the said ship with all singular the cordage mentioned and Expressed in the schedule annexed to the said libell." Hogg had seen and carefully read the schedule and confirmed "it is of his this deponents handwriting, and was by him made and copyed out, of the said Bartletts. booke, And was and is true, and that all the said cordage was of the quality and quantity as in the said schedule is expressed, and were alsoe well worth the severall summes schedulate, and that they were then soe sommonly sold".<ref>[[HCA 13/72 f.322r Annotate|HCA 13/72 f.322r]]</ref> However, Edward Bartlet remained unpaid and had suffered "great losse and dammage, by not receiveing his principall, but knoweth not what to estimate the said damage at".<ref>[[HCA 13/72 f.322v Annotate|HCA 13/72 f.322v]]</ref>
 ==Comment on sources==

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 |Has opening text=William Hogg
 |Has signoff text=William Hogg
-|Transcription image={{#transcription-image: }}
+|Transcription image={{#transcription-image:  }}
 |Language skills=English language,
 |Res parish=Stepney
@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 |Res country=England
 |Birth year=1637
 |Deposition start page(s)=HCA 13/72 f.322r Annotate,
 |Deposition date(s)=Apr 27 1658
@@ Line 34: / Line 35: @@
 ==Evidence from High Court of Admiralty==
-Twenty-one year old William Hogg deposed on April 27th 1658 in the High Court of Admiralty. He was examined on a libel on behalf of Edward Bartlet in the cause "Edward Bartlet against the ship called the ''Edward'' of London whereof Richard Stevens was master and against Richard Rooke and Company Interveyning for their interest".<ref>[[HCA 13/72 f.322r Annotate|HCA 13/72 f.322r]]</ref>
+Twenty-one year old William Hogg deposed on April 27th 1658 in the High Court of Admiralty. He was examined on a libel on behalf of Edward Bartlet in the cause "Edward Bartlet against the ship called the ''Edward'' of London whereof Richard Stevens was master and against Richard Rooke and Company interveyning for their interest".<ref>[[HCA 13/72 f.322r Annotate|HCA 13/72 f.322r]]</ref>
 The case concerns the ship the ''Edward'' of London, of which Richard Stevens was masteer and commander until the time of his death.
-William Hogg was familiar with the ship the ''Edward'', having sailed in another ship in her company in 1653.Hogg stated that the ship the ''Edward'' was in the River Thames fin early 1654, and wanted great repairing, and especially cable and cordage". Her captain, Richard Stevens, came to Edward Bartlet, a ropemaker "and desired him the said Bartlet, to furnish him with the same, for the use of the said ship".Hoogg testified that Bartlet "did furnish the said ship with all singular the cordage mentioned and Expressed in the schedule annexed to the said libell." Hogg had seen and carefully read the schedule and confirmed "it is of his this deponents handwriting, and was by him made and copyed out, of the said Bartletts. booke, And was and is true, and that all the said cordage was of the quality and quantity as in the said schedule is expressed, and were alsoe well worth the severall summes schedulate, and that they were then soe sommonly sold".<ref>[[HCA 13/72 f.322r Annotate|HCA 13/72 f.322r]]</ref> However, Edward Bartlet remained unpaid and had suffered "great losse and dammage, by not receiveing his principall, but knoweth not what to estimate the said damage at".<ref>[[HCA 13/72 f.322v Annotate|HCA 13/72 f.322v]]</ref>
+William Hogg was familiar with the ship the ''Edward'', having sailed in another ship in her company in 1653. Hogg stated that the ship the ''Edward'' was in the River Thames in early 1654, and wanted great repairing, and especially cable and cordage". Her captain, Richard Stevens, came to Edward Bartlet, a ropemaker "and desired him the said Bartlet, to furnish him with the same, for the use of the said ship".Hoogg testified that Bartlet "did furnish the said ship with all singular the cordage mentioned and Expressed in the schedule annexed to the said libell." Hogg had seen and carefully read the schedule and confirmed "it is of his this deponents handwriting, and was by him made and copyed out, of the said Bartletts. booke, And was and is true, and that all the said cordage was of the quality and quantity as in the said schedule is expressed, and were alsoe well worth the severall summes schedulate, and that they were then soe sommonly sold".<ref>[[HCA 13/72 f.322r Annotate|HCA 13/72 f.322r]]</ref> However, Edward Bartlet remained unpaid and had suffered "great losse and dammage, by not receiveing his principall, but knoweth not what to estimate the said damage at".<ref>[[HCA 13/72 f.322v Annotate|HCA 13/72 f.322v]]</ref>
 ==Comment on sources==