Thames shipyards in 1650s - Revision history

ColinGreenstreet at 00:38, February 21, 2017

2017-02-21T00:38:09Z

ColinGreenstreet at 06:22, December 4, 2016

2016-12-04T06:22:03Z

ColinGreenstreet at 06:21, December 4, 2016

2016-12-04T06:21:58Z

ColinGreenstreet at 12:37, December 31, 2012

2012-12-31T12:37:54Z

ColinGreenstreet at 08:03, December 6, 2012

2012-12-06T08:03:41Z

ColinGreenstreet at 08:01, December 6, 2012

2012-12-06T08:01:40Z

ColinGreenstreet at 08:01, December 6, 2012

2012-12-06T08:01:01Z

ColinGreenstreet at 07:59, December 6, 2012

2012-12-06T07:59:16Z

ColinGreenstreet at 07:58, December 6, 2012

2012-12-06T07:58:17Z

ColinGreenstreet at 07:57, December 6, 2012

2012-12-06T07:57:06Z

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 /11/12: CSG, created page
 ----
 __TOC__
@@ Line 61: / Line 20: @@
 ==Peter Pett==
-The owners of the ship the Ruth were involved in a dispute about the alleged non-payment for sheathing provided to the Ruth by the deceased Peter Pett’s shipyard.
+The owners of the ship the ''Ruth'' were involved in a dispute about the alleged non-payment for sheathing provided to the Ruth by the deceased Peter Pett’s shipyard.
 Peter Pett (b. ?, d. 1652), was of Deptford, Kent. He was a master ship-builder at the Deptford yard from XXX till his death in 1652. This Peter Pett was half-cousin of Commissioner Phineas Pett (b. 1570, d. 1647), master-shipwright, Chatham 1605-29, Navy Commissioner, Chatham 1630-47<ref>PROB 11/224 Bowyer 196-244 Will of Peter Pett of Deptford, Kent 18 August 1652; see also PROB 11/362 Bath 1-59 Will of Ann Pett, Widow of Woolwich, Kent 07 January 1680; Latham & Mathews, ''The diary of Samuel Pepys: Companion'' (?London, 1983), pp. 325-326</ref>

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:22, December 4, 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Thames shipyards in 1650s'''		'''Thames shipyards in 1650s'''

		+	'''Editorial history'''
		+
		+	08/11/12: CSG, created page
		+	----
		+	'''Purpose of page'''
		+
		+	The MarineLives project is seeking to link and enhance HCA 13/71, not just to transcribe it.
		+
		+	Thames shipyards feature in a number of HCA 13/71 cases and depositions.
		+
		+	All associates, facilitators, advisors and PhD Forum members are encouraged to contribute to this page from their knowledge of the material, and from their broader knowledge and interest in the topic.
		+
		+	* Which Thames shipyards can we identify in cases and depositions in HCA 13/71 by location and ownership?
		+	* What can we learn about their working practices?
		+	* What can we learn about their economics?
		+	* What can we learn about the type of work they undertook, and the type of customers and ships they worked with?
		+	----
		+	'''Adding footnotes'''
		+
		+	* Go into edit mode
		+
		+	* Insert immediately after the sentence or phrase you wish to annotate the following macro:
		+
		+	<nowiki><ref>This is the footnote text</ref></nowiki>
		+
		+	* Replace 'This is the footnote text' with the footnote you wish to add, using the format: first name, surname, title, (place of publication, date of publication), page or folio number
		+
		+	* Save the page
		+
		+	'''Creating an electronic link within the footnote to a digital source'''
		+
		+	* Using the link icon in the top RH menu bar in your open window, highlight the footnote text which you wish to become the clickable link. This will place square brackets round the text, within the existing curved brackets
		+
		+	e.g. <nowiki><ref>[Electronic link to a digital source]</ref></nowiki>
		+
		+	* Insert the URL of the digital source IN FRONT of the existing text, but still within the square brackets, leaving one space between the end of the URL and the start of the footnote text
		+
		+	e.g. <nowiki><ref>[http://XXXXX Electronic link to a digital source]</ref></nowiki>
		+
		+	* Save the page, and the footnote text will now show 'Electronic link to a digital source' as a clickable link, which, when clicked, will go to 'http://XXXXX'
		+
		+	* FOOTNOTE TEMPLATE:
		+
		+	- ''HCA 13/71 f.XXXX Case: XXXX; Deposition: XXXX; Date: XXXX. Transcribed by XXXX''<ref>[http://XXXXX Electronic link to a digital source]</ref>
		+	----
		+	__TOC__
		+	----
	==Suggested links==		==Suggested links==

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:21, December 4, 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Thames shipyards in 1650s'''		'''Thames shipyards in 1650s'''

−	~~'''Editorial history'''~~
−
−	~~08/11/12: CSG, created page~~
−	~~----~~
−	~~'''Purpose of page'''~~
−
−	~~The MarineLives project is seeking to link and enhance HCA 13/71, not just to transcribe it.~~
−
−	~~Thames shipyards feature in a number of HCA 13/71 cases and depositions.~~
−
−	~~All associates, facilitators, advisors and PhD Forum members are encouraged to contribute to this page from their knowledge of the material, and from their broader knowledge and interest in the topic.~~
−
−	* Which Thames shipyards can we identify in cases and depositions in HCA 13/71 by location and ownership?
−	* What can we learn about their working practices?
−	* What can we learn about their economics?
−	* What can we learn about the type of work they undertook, and the type of customers and ships they worked with?
−	~~----~~
−	~~'''Adding footnotes'''~~
−
−	* Go into edit mode
−
−	* Insert immediately after the sentence or phrase you wish to annotate the following macro:
−
−	~~<nowiki><ref>This is the footnote text</ref></nowiki>~~
−
−	* Replace 'This is the footnote text' with the footnote you wish to add, using the format: first name, surname, title, (place of publication, date of publication), page or folio number
−
−	* Save the page
−
−	~~'''Creating an electronic link within the footnote to a digital source'''~~
−
−	* Using the link icon in the top RH menu bar in your open window, highlight the footnote text which you wish to become the clickable link. This will place square brackets round the text, within the existing curved brackets
−
−	~~e.g. <nowiki><ref>[Electronic link to a digital source]</ref></nowiki>~~
−
−	* Insert the URL of the digital source IN FRONT of the existing text, but still within the square brackets, leaving one space between the end of the URL and the start of the footnote text
−
−	~~e.g. <nowiki><ref>[http://XXXXX Electronic link to a digital source]</ref></nowiki>~~
−
−	* Save the page, and the footnote text will now show 'Electronic link to a digital source' as a clickable link, which, when clicked, will go to 'http://XXXXX'
−
−	* FOOTNOTE TEMPLATE:
−
−	~~- ''HCA 13/71 f.XXXX Case: XXXX; Deposition: XXXX; Date: XXXX. Transcribed by XXXX''<ref>[http://XXXXX Electronic link to a digital source]</ref>~~
−	~~----~~
−	~~__TOC__~~
−	~~----~~
	==Suggested links==		==Suggested links==

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:37, December 31, 2012
Line 51:		Line 51:

	[[PhD Forum\|PhD Forum]]		[[PhD Forum\|PhD Forum]]
		+	[[PhD Forum#head-94d5186ba3ec63d1ebcb1e902a2d13ac15f0c527\|PhD Forum Themes]]

	[[Materials handling\|Materials handling]]		[[Materials handling\|Materials handling]]

@@ Line 146: / Line 146: @@
 . Repeated before doctor Godolphin."
-- ''HCA 13/71 f.220r Case: Pett against the Ruth and Maurice Tompson and others; Deposition: 1. Edward Tompson of Shadwell in the County of Middlesex Mariner, aged 49 yeeres; Date: 10/05/1656''<ref>[http://marinelives-transcript.org/scripto/scripto/?scripto_action=transcribe&scripto_doc_id=687&scripto_doc_page_id=606 HCA 13/71 f.220r]</ref>
+- ''HCA 13/71 f.219v & f.220r Case: Pett against the Ruth and Maurice Tompson and others; Deposition: 1. Edward Tompson of Shadwell in the County of Middlesex Mariner, aged 49 yeeres; Date: 10/05/1656''<ref>[http://marinelives-transcript.org/scripto/scripto/?scripto_action=transcribe&scripto_doc_id=687&scripto_doc_page_id=605 HCA 13/71 f.219v]; [http://marinelives-transcript.org/scripto/scripto/?scripto_action=transcribe&scripto_doc_id=687&scripto_doc_page_id=606 HCA 13/71 f.220r]</ref>
 ----

@@ Line 72: / Line 72: @@
 According to Edward T(h)ompson, a bargain had made between Maurice Thompson, the merchant brother of Edward T(h)ompson and Mr. Pett for the sum of two hundred and seventy pounds, yet Pett subsequently, after performing the work, attempted to extract the two hundred and eighty pounds he had proposed during the lengthy verbal bargaining process.
-In his deposition, Edward T(h)ompson offered several proofs that, before his death, Mr Pett had pulled back from his higher claim. Firstly, that Pett had lived for a further three years and had never made further claim on the alleged debt of ten pounds. Secondly, further work had been done two years later on the Ruth at Pett's yard on behalf on Maurice Thompson, with the ship being "graved", and no deductions had been made or attempted for a pretended debt by Pett. Finally, that Maurice Thompson had paid Mr Pett further moneys since the work on the sheathings and no attempt had been made to recover the alleged debt.  Indeed, maurice Thompson had also received payments from Mr Pett subsequent to the sheathing work, without attempted deductions of the alleged debt.
+In his deposition, Edward T(h)ompson offered several proofs that, before his death, Mr Pett had pulled back from his higher claim. Firstly, that Pett had lived for a further three years and had never made further claim on the alleged debt of ten pounds. Secondly, further work had been done two years later on the Ruth at Pett's yard on behalf on Maurice Thompson, with the ship being "graved", and no deductions had been made or attempted for a pretended debt by Pett. Finally, that Maurice Thompson had paid Mr Pett further moneys since the work on the sheathings and no attempt had been made to recover the alleged debt.  Indeed, Maurice Thompson had also received payments from Mr Pett subsequent to the sheathing work, without attempted deductions of the alleged debt.
 * "15. The 10th of May 1656.

@@ Line 70: / Line 70: @@
 Thompson's deposition is worth reading in its entirety, both for its descriptions of the different ship yard trades and weekly payment practices, and for its description of the bargaining and subsequenly disputed verbal contract made for two sheathings to be applied to the Ruth.
-A bargain was allegedly made between Maurice Thompson, the merchant brother of Edward T(h)ompson and Mr. Pett for the sum of two hundred and seventy pounds, yet Pett subsequently, after performing the work, attempted to extract the two hundred and eighty pounds he had proposed.
+According to Edward T(h)ompson, a bargain had made between Maurice Thompson, the merchant brother of Edward T(h)ompson and Mr. Pett for the sum of two hundred and seventy pounds, yet Pett subsequently, after performing the work, attempted to extract the two hundred and eighty pounds he had proposed during the lengthy verbal bargaining process.
 Edward T(h)ompson offers in his deposition several proofs that Pett had pulled back from his higher claim before his death. Namely that Pett had lived for a further three years and had never made further claim on an alleged debt of ten pounds. Moreover, further work had been done two years later on the Ruth at Pett's yard on behalf on Maurice Thompson, with the ship being "graved", and no deductions had been made or attempted for a pretended debt by Pett. Finally, that Maurice Thompson had paid Mr Pett further moneys since the work on the sheathings and

@@ Line 68: / Line 68: @@
 Edward Thompson was deposed in a case for alleged non-payment of due moneys owing to Mr Pett's shipyards from the years 1648 and 1649.  Pett himself was by then dead.
-Thompson's deposition is worth reading in its entirety, both for its descriptions of the different ship yard trades and weekly pament practices, and for its description of the bargaining and subsequenly disputed verbal contract made for two sheathings to be applied to the Ruth.
+Thompson's deposition is worth reading in its entirety, both for its descriptions of the different ship yard trades and weekly payment practices, and for its description of the bargaining and subsequenly disputed verbal contract made for two sheathings to be applied to the Ruth.
 A bargain was allegedly made between Maurice Thompson, the merchant brother of Edward T(h)ompson and Mr. Pett for the sum of two hundred and seventy pounds, yet Pett subsequently, after performing the work, attempted to extract the two hundred and eighty pounds he had proposed.