MRP: Testing the wiki - Revision history

ColinGreenstreet at 07:11, May 10, 2012

2012-05-10T07:11:03Z

2012-02-20T07:56:38Z

2012-01-12T09:55:20Z

2012-01-12T09:48:12Z

2012-01-12T09:01:16Z

2012-01-12T08:56:55Z

2012-01-10T11:58:04Z

2012-01-09T08:18:39Z

2012-01-09T08:09:23Z

2012-01-05T08:59:40Z

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 ----
 ==Look & feel==
 ===Front page===
@@ Line 61: / Line 62: @@
 ----
 ==Functionality==
 ===Search===
@@ Line 94: / Line 96: @@
 ----
 ==Academic apparatus==
 ===Foot notes===
@@ Line 135: / Line 138: @@
 - See [[MRP: Chancery cases|Chancery cases]]
 ----
 ===Inventories===

@@ Line 26: / Line 26: @@
 * Is body text the right size at the standard browser and screen resolution you use?
-* Are you clear that font size can be changed using the zoom function in your browser?
+* Are you clear that font size can be changed using the zoom function in your operating system?
 ----
 ===Page size & shape===
@@ Line 48: / Line 48: @@
 ===Images===
-* Are images sized appropriately?
+* Are images sized appropriately at your standard browser magnification?
 * Do you prefer fixed size images embedded within the text, or images viewable in popup windows in which the images can be resized?

@@ Line 52: / Line 52: @@
 * Do you prefer fixed size images embedded within the text, or images viewable in popup windows in which the images can be resized?
 ----
 ==Functionality==
@@ Line 66: / Line 69: @@
 * Is browsing encouraged as well as focused research?
-* Is it clear what navigation are available and how to use them?
+* Is it clear what navigation tools are available and how to use them?
 ----
 ===Finding tools===

@@ Line 25: / Line 25: @@
 * Is body text the right size at the standard browser and screen resolution you use?
 ----
 ===Page size & shape===
@@ Line 105: / Line 107: @@
 * What potential do you see in the specific approach taken by this wiki to primary and secondary sources?
-* How do you see this approach and this wiki in the context of other approaches and digital initiatives being taken by national and local archives
+* How do you see this approach and this wiki in the context of other approaches and digital initiatives being taken by national and local archives?
 - See for example the National Archives planned (but not yet implemented) new approach to annotation and integration of data by professional archivists and by users, which will be added to the new [http://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/SearchUI/ Discovery] platform (currently in Beta development)<ref>http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/news/659.htm, viewed 12/01/12</ref>

@@ Line 100: / Line 100: @@
 * Do you support this wiki's current policy of preferring the Internet Archive e-book reader over the Google e-book reader, where there is a choice for the same edition?
 ----
 ==Primary source content==
@@ Line 160: / Line 168: @@
 - [[MRP: People|People]]
 ----
 ==Providing your feedback==
 [[Comments]]

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 /12/11, CSG: Created page
 ----
 __TOC__

@@ Line 33: / Line 33: @@
 - For example, do you prefer a different width of page for dense, all text documents, which by their nature have no paragraphs, such as Chancery primary documents, to the width you prefer for secondary documents containing images?
 ----
 ===Images===

@@ Line 80: / Line 80: @@
 ----
 ==Primary source content==
 * Would you be interested in contributing primary material, as the initial transcriber of a wiki posted document, or as a subsequent contributor to that document in the form of context, annotations, and suggested primary and secondary sources?