MRP: HCA13/73 - Revision history

ColinGreenstreet: Renamed to "HCA 13/73"

2012-05-03T09:12:30Z

Renamed to "HCA 13/73"

Show changes

ColinGreenstreet at 09:10, May 3, 2012

2012-05-03T09:10:13Z

ColinGreenstreet at 09:09, May 3, 2012

2012-05-03T09:09:42Z

Show changes

ColinGreenstreet: Renamed to "HCA 13/73"

2012-05-03T09:04:41Z

Renamed to "HCA 13/73"

Show changes

ColinGreenstreet at 03:57, May 3, 2012

2012-05-03T03:57:41Z

ColinGreenstreet at 03:34, May 3, 2012

2012-05-03T03:34:59Z

ColinGreenstreet at 22:32, May 2, 2012

2012-05-02T22:32:38Z

ColinGreenstreet at 12:40, May 2, 2012

2012-05-02T12:40:14Z

ColinGreenstreet at 11:25, May 2, 2012

2012-05-02T11:25:19Z

ColinGreenstreet at 11:24, May 2, 2012

2012-05-02T11:24:49Z

@@ Line 882: / Line 882: @@
 :nd RICHARD JAMES of Limehouse. Boatswaine
-of the ship the ''Oporto Merchant' aged 3?8 yeeres or
+of the ship the ''Oporto Merchant'' aged 3?8 yeeres or
 thereabouts sworne and Examined:

@@ Line 733: / Line 733: @@
 ----
 ===Case: Rowland Hill John Hill and Company own:rs of the Oporto Merchant vs. Sir James Drax et al: Deposition: 1. Thomas Chevers: Date: March 9th 1658===
 //The 9:th day of March 1658
@@ Line 788: / Line 792: @@
 Meanes of looseing y:e Misen, y:e said ship lay broad XXX
 to the sea, and by reason thereof shipped a very violent sea
-w:ch washed overboard And ?Sheats Anchor, and the long boate and/
+w:ch washed overboard And ?Sheats Anchor, and the long boate
 ----
 ==Notes==

@@ Line 730: / Line 730: @@
 to come close to their Admirall,
-----
+Rowland Hill John Hill and Company own:rs of)
-===Case: Maurice Thompson, Thomas CanXXXX, Christofer Willoughby, John Page et al v. the Dutch East India Company: Deposition: 3. XXXX: Date: January 31st, 1660===
+the ''Oporto Merchant''.  Thomas Chevers M:r)
 ----
 ==Notes==

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:32, May 2, 2012
Line 683:		Line 683:
	===Case: Maurice Thompson, Thomas Canham, Christofer Willoughby, John Page et al v. the Dutch East India Company: Deposition: 3. Alexander Prescott, of London, Merchant, aged 27: Date: ffebruary 17th, 1658===		===Case: Maurice Thompson, Thomas Canham, Christofer Willoughby, John Page et al v. the Dutch East India Company: Deposition: 3. Alexander Prescott, of London, Merchant, aged 27: Date: ffebruary 17th, 1658===

		+	//The 17th of ffebruray 1658
		+
		+	Examined upon the fore said allegaccon
		+
		+	3. ALEXANDER PRESCOTT of London Marchant aged 27 yeeres or
		+	thereabouts sworne and examined.
		+
		+	To the first and second articles hee saith and deposeth That hee very well
		+	knoweth the procudents Maurice Thompsom, Thomas Canham, Christofer
		+	Willoughby, John Page and company aclate and saith they were in and for
		+	all the monthes arlate of the yeere 1656 XXXXX and Imployers of the
		+	shipp the ''Jonathan'' arlate (Robert GXXXXX commander) as a trading or merchandizing voyage from England to the parts of East India in XXXXX was XX retourne for England for their use and accompt, and saith that in
		+	January XXX was ?two ?yeers the said shipp being quietly trading in the said
		+	parts, and having aboard her a quantitie of marchandizes consisting in XX
		+	cottons and callicos XX XXX XXX factor XXX account taken aboard her on the coast
		+	of Cormandel was carrying XX XXX for Bantam for w:ch place the said goods were
		+	XXXX and were provided XXXXX to be ther XXXXXX and XXXXXXX
		+	and not for XXXXX to be disbursed XX XXX XXXXXX nir XXX XXXX XX
		+	XXX XX XXXX soe XXXXX to her said ?merchants as XX Bantam, w:ch hee
		+	knoweth being burser of the said shipp and goeing the said voyage from place to
		+	place in her, being alsoe XXXX X XXX XXX XXX XXXX of the, XX XXX
		+
		+	To the third and fourth articles hee saidth and deposeth that the said shipp XXXXX
		+	XX XX her course from the said coast for Bantam and XX XXXXX Island
		+	of Pulliaayanjan about XXX XX XXX leagues distance from Bantam XXX
		+	XXXX XXX XXXX of dutch shipps (w:ch wer in the service and Imployment
		+	of the dutch East India company) XXX, saving that one of them XX
		+	them XXXX, and XXX XXXX XXX along with XXX XXXXX, and saith XXXX
		+	XXXX//
		+	----
		+	P1110339
		+	f. 71 recto
		+
		+	//the ''Jonathan'' XXXXing a XXXX XXXXX under the said XXXXX XXXX XXX to goe into
		+	Bantam the next day, the said dutch shipp XXXX XXXXX the said
		+	other foure dutch shipps riding also neere, and the next morning the ''Jonathan''
		+	XXX XXXX to goe into Bantam the said dutch shipps boat ?came aboard XXXX
		+	Bantam, for the dutch had ?warrs with the Bantamers and the said
		+	sutch shipps lay there XXX XXXX to hinder all shipps from going in,
		+	having order from their Generall ?intendeant, and being authorised that they
		+	of the XXXXXX were bound to XXX in them their merchandizing designe, and therewith all
		+	XXXX to XXX in, the skipper of the said dutch shipp aboard the ''Jonathan''
		+	called out to those aboard the said dutch shipp to fire at the ''?Jonathan'', and
		+	they thereupon XXXX a XXX XX the ''Jonathan'', and then the ''Jonathan'' being commanded
		+
		+	to come close to their Admirall,

@@ Line 109: / Line 109: @@
 To the 3 hee saith hee
 ----
-===Case: Claim of Stephen ?Pallavacio, of Genoa, regarding silver bars: Deposition: 1.  Peter Vandeput, of London, merchant, aged 47: Date: January 29th, 1660===
+===Case: Claim of Stephen ?Pallavacio, of Genoa, regarding silver bars: Deposition: 1.  Peter Vandeput, of London, merchant, aged 47: Date: January 29th, 1658===
 P1110310
@@ Line 271: / Line 271: @@
 <nowiki>**********************************************</nowiki>
-===Case: Claim of Stephen ?Pallavacio, of Genoa, regarding silver bars: Deposition: 2.  Abraham Cabeljan, of London, merchant, aged 53: Date: January 27th, 1660===
+===Case: Claim of Stephen ?Pallavacio, of Genoa, regarding silver bars: Deposition: 2.  Abraham Cabeljan, of London, merchant, aged 53: Date: January 27th, 1658===
 The same day
@@ Line 412: / Line 412: @@
 <nowiki>****************************************************</nowiki>
-===Case: Claim of Stephen ?Pallavacio, of Genoa, regarding silver bars: Deposition: 3.  John Lewis: Date: January 29th, 1660===
+===Case: Claim of Stephen ?Pallavacio, of Genoa, regarding silver bars: Deposition: 3.  John Lewis: Date: January 29th, 1658===
 //The 29:th of January 1660.
@@ Line 489: / Line 489: @@
 <nowiki>*******************************************************</nowiki>
-===Case: XXXX: Deposition: 1. Domingo de a Seida, of London, Merchant, aged 25: Date: January 31st, 1660===
+===Case: XXXX: Deposition: 1. Domingo de a Seida, of London, Merchant, aged 25: Date: January 31st, 1658===
 The 31:th day of January 1660
@@ Line 516: / Line 516: @@
 ----
-===Case: Maurice Thompson, Thomas canXXXX, Christofer Willoughby, John Page et al v. the Dutch East India Company: Deposition: 1. Henry Dacres, of London, Merchant, aged 34: Date: January 31st, 1660===
+===Case: Maurice Thompson, Thomas Canham, Christofer Willoughby, John Page et al v. the Dutch East India Company: Deposition: 1. Henry Dacres, of London, Merchant, aged 34: Date: January 31st, 1658===
 P1110333
@@ Line 563: / Line 563: @@
 any other part or place thereabouts to be bartered away, and eben
 XXXXX XXXX and provided for Bantam, where they were to be sold
-and nartered away for such XXXX as were then to be head and ?procured
+and bartered away for such XXXX as were then to be head and ?procured
 for the most advantage of the said producents, w:ch hee knowes for that
 hee was supra cargo aforesaid and the person there ?carryed the said goods to
@@ Line 610: / Line 610: @@
 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
 ----
-===Case: Maurice Thompson, Thomas canXXXX, Christofer Willoughby, John Page et al v. the Dutch East India Company: Deposition: 2. William Stephen, of Limehouse, Marriner, formerly masters Mate of the Jonathan: Date: January 31st, 1660===
+===Case: Maurice Thompson, Thomas Canham, Christofer Willoughby, John Page et al v. the Dutch East India Company: Deposition: 2. William Stephen, of Limehouse, Marriner, formerly masters Mate of the Jonathan: Date: January 31st, 1658===
 P1110336
@@ Line 622: / Line 622: @@
 sworne and examined
-To the first
+To the first article of the said allon hee saith and deposeth that
 ----
-===Case: Maurice Thompson, Thomas canXXXX, Christofer Willoughby, John Page et al v. the Dutch East India Company: Deposition: 3. XXXX: Date: January 31st, 1660===
+===Case: Maurice Thompson, Thomas CanXXXX, Christofer Willoughby, John Page et al v. the Dutch East India Company: Deposition: 3. XXXX: Date: January 31st, 1660===
 ----
 ==Notes==