John Barley - Revision history

ColinGreenstreet at 10:42, October 29, 2016

2016-10-29T10:42:58Z

ColinGreenstreet at 21:54, October 17, 2016

2016-10-17T21:54:00Z

ColinGreenstreet at 00:37, August 18, 2016

2016-08-18T00:37:57Z

ColinGreenstreet at 00:36, August 18, 2016

2016-08-18T00:36:23Z

ColinGreenstreet at 00:12, August 17, 2016

2016-08-17T00:12:06Z

ColinGreenstreet at 23:48, August 16, 2016

2016-08-16T23:48:27Z

ColinGreenstreet: Created page with "{{Banner}} {{SemBioLongInfoBoxThree |Person=John Barley |First name=John |Last name=Barley |Occupation=Waterman |Training=Not apprentice |Citizen=Unknown |Literacy=Marke |Has..."

2016-08-16T22:14:54Z

Created page with "{{Banner}} {{SemBioLongInfoBoxThree |Person=John Barley |First name=John |Last name=Barley |Occupation=Waterman |Training=Not apprentice |Citizen=Unknown |Literacy=Marke |Has..."

New page

{{Banner}}
{{SemBioLongInfoBoxThree
|Person=John Barley
|First name=John
|Last name=Barley
|Occupation=Waterman
|Training=Not apprentice
|Citizen=Unknown
|Literacy=Marke
|Has opening text=Johannes Barley
|Has signoff text=V
|Transcription image={{#transcription-image: }}
|Language skills=English language,
|Res street=Wapping
|Res parish=Stepney
|Res county=Middlesex
|Res country=England
|Birth year=1628
|Deposition start page(s)=HCA 13/63 f.294r Annotate,
|Deposition date(s)=Jun 25 1650
|Has infobox completed=Yes
|Has synthesis completed=No
|Has HCA evidence completed=No
|Has source comment completed=No
}}
==Biographical synthesis==
John Barley (b. ca. 1628; d. ?). Waterman.

Resident in Wapping in the parish of Stepney in 1650.

==Evidence from High Court of Admiralty==
Twenty-two year old John Barley deposed on June 25th 1650. He was examined in the case of "Hans Claeson and Sery against Broadgate and Willson et cetera".<ref>[[HCA 13/63 f.294r Annotate|HCA 13/63 f.294r]]</ref>

==Comment on sources==

@@ Line 40: / Line 40: @@
 The anchor stock prevented the ''Saint Jacob's'' keel from settling properly on the river bed at low tide. Instead the ship toppled over in a hole in the river, and as a result her cargo of corn or oats was "the greatest part thereof soe spoyled and damnified that it was worth very little or nothing to what it might have bin sould for in case the said misfortune had not happened".<ref>[[HCA 13/63 f.294v Annotate|HCA 13/63 f.294v]]</ref>
-Complicating the case and Barley's testimony is Barley's admission in answer to interrogatories that he had never known a ship, laden or unladen, to come to an anchor at the spot the ''Saint Jacob'' was anchored. Moreover, John Barley added in answer to a further interrogatory that "it is not usuall for any master or pilot to bring a ship laden into
+Complicating the case and Barley's testimony is Barley's admission in answer to interrogatories that he had never known a ship, laden or unladen, to come to an anchor at the spot the ''Saint Jacob'' was anchored. Moreover, John Barley added in answer to a further interrogatory that "it is not usuall for any master or pilot to bring a ship laden into the River of Thames ashore without first comeing to an anchor in the channell and there remayneing by the space of one tyde as is interrogated, there to inspect and looke that the place whither they intend to bring the said ship bee free from such incumbrances and inconveniencies as is interrogated."<ref>[[HCA 13/63 f.294v Annotate|HCA 13/63 f.294v]]</ref>
-the River of Thames ashore without first comeing to an anchor in the channell and there remayneing by the space of one Tyde as is interrogated, there to inspect and looke that the place whither they intend to bring the said ship bee free from such incumbrances and inconveniencies as is interrogated."<ref>[[HCA 13/63 f.294v Annotate|HCA 13/63 f.294v]]</ref>
 On balance, John Barley concluded that although the ship lay in a hole, which caused the tipping over of the ship, this would not have happened if she had not first sat upon the anchor stock of the ''Phillip''.<ref>[[HCA 13/63 f.294v Annotate|HCA 13/63 f.294v]]</ref>

@@ Line 34: / Line 34: @@
 The case concerned the Flemish ship the ''Saint Jacob'' (Master: Hance Claeson) and a second ship the ''Phillips'' (Master: Richard Hussee).
-John Barley, a waterman, had been aboard the ''Saint Jacob'' when it was at Woolwich. Subsequently, the ''Saint Jacob'' came to Dickshore, where she fell foul of the anchor stock of the ''Phillips''. Barley, and his fellow witness, another waterman named [[Mathew Purdye]], witnessed the ''Saint Jacob'' lying foul of the anchor stock, themselves "comeing from the Hermitage downe to Dickshore".<ref>[[HCA 13/63 f.294r Annotate|HCA 13/63 f.294r]]</ref>
+John Barley, a waterman, had been aboard the ''Saint Jacob'' when it was at Woolwich. Subsequently, the ''Saint Jacob'' came to Dickshore, where she fell foul of the anchor stock of the ship the ''Phillip''. Barley, and his fellow witness, another waterman named [[Mathew Purdye]], witnessed the ''Saint Jacob'' lying foul of the anchor stock, themselves "comeing from the Hermitage downe to Dickshore".<ref>[[HCA 13/63 f.294r Annotate|HCA 13/63 f.294r]]</ref>
 John Barley recited that by the "lawes and customes of the River Thames noe ship or vessell ought to ride att an Anchor therein without a buoye or beacon fixed theretop as is arlate to the end that any shipps or other vessells comeing neare the same may have thereby notice where such anchors doe lye and soe avoyd the danger which otherwise through want thereof might and would happen". This John Barley knew "being a waterman by profession and haveing served an apprenticeship in and upon the said River hath observed the custome to bee as is predeposed".<ref>[[HCA 13/63 f.294r Annotate|HCA 13/63 f.294r]]</ref>
@@ Line 43: / Line 43: @@
 the River of Thames ashore without first comeing to an anchor in the channell and there remayneing by the space of one Tyde as is interrogated, there to inspect and looke that the place whither they intend to bring the said ship bee free from such incumbrances and inconveniencies as is interrogated."<ref>[[HCA 13/63 f.294v Annotate|HCA 13/63 f.294v]]</ref>
-On balance, John Barley concluded that although the ship lay in a hole, which caused the tipping over of the ship, this would not have happened if she had not first sat upon the anchor stock of the ''Phillips''.<ref>[[HCA 13/63 f.294v Annotate|HCA 13/63 f.294v]]</ref>
+On balance, John Barley concluded that although the ship lay in a hole, which caused the tipping over of the ship, this would not have happened if she had not first sat upon the anchor stock of the ''Phillip''.<ref>[[HCA 13/63 f.294v Annotate|HCA 13/63 f.294v]]</ref>
 <u>Witnesses in the case of Hans Claeson and Company against Broadgate and Willson</u>

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:12, August 17, 2016
Line 44:		Line 44:

	On balance, John Barley concluded that although the ship lay in a hole, which caused the tipping over of the ship, this would not have happened if she had not first sat upon the anchor stock of the ''Phillips''.<ref>[[HCA 13/63 f.294v Annotate\|HCA 13/63 f.294v]]</ref>		On balance, John Barley concluded that although the ship lay in a hole, which caused the tipping over of the ship, this would not have happened if she had not first sat upon the anchor stock of the ''Phillips''.<ref>[[HCA 13/63 f.294v Annotate\|HCA 13/63 f.294v]]</ref>
		+
		+	<u>Witnesses in the case of Hans Claeson and Company against Broadgate and Willson</u>
		+
		+	#Jacobus Merrit de Lymehouse parochia de Stepney in comitatu Middlesex aquarius aetatis 42 annorum, April 3rd 1650<ref>[[HCA 13/63 f.21v Annotate\|HCA 13/63 f.21v]]</ref>
		+	#Jacobus Symmes de Lymehouse parochia de Stepney in comitatu Middlesex aquarius aetatis 39 annorum, April 3rd 1650<ref>[[HCA 13/63 f.24r Annotate\|HCA 13/63 f.24r]]</ref>
		+	#Robertus Dennis de Lymehouse parochia de Stepney aquarius aetais 33. annorum, April 3rd 1650<ref>[[HCA 13/63 f.26r Annotate\|HCA 13/63 f.26r]]</ref>
		+	#Willimus Chuter de Lymehouse parochia de Stepney in comitau Middlesex aquarius aetatis 43 annorum, April 4th 1650<ref>[[HCA 13/63 f.28r Annotate\|HCA 13/63 f.28r]]</ref>
		+	#Johannes Ledman de Lymehouse parochia de Stepney in comitatu Middlesex joyner aetatis 54 annorum, April 4th 1650<ref>[[HCA 13/63 f.30r Annotate\|HCA 13/63 f.30r]]</ref>
		+	#William Hooke servus et apprenticius Richard Hussee partis producon in hac causa aetatis sua 19 annorum, April 4th 1650<ref>[[HCA 13/63 f.31r Annotate\|HCA 13/63 f.31r]]</ref>
		+	#Johannes Badge famulus et apprenticius Richard Hussee de Lymehouse infra parochiam de Stepney in comitatu Middlesex nauta aetatis sua 18. annorum, April 4th 1650<ref>[[HCA 13/63 f.32r Annotate\|HCA 13/63 f.32r]]</ref>
		+
		+	#Johannes Barley de Wapping infra parochiam da Stepney in comitatu Middlesex waterman natus apud [?Owbound] in comitatu Bedford aetatis sua 22. annorum, June 26th 1650<ref>[[HCA 13/63 f.294r Annotate\|HCA 13/63 f.294r]]</ref>
		+	#Mathaeus Purdye de Wapping infra parochiam de Stepney et comitatu Middlesex waterman aetatis sua 22. annorum, June 26th 1650<ref>[[HCA 13/63 f.294r Annotate\|HCA 13/63 f.294r]]</ref>
		+	#Jacob Vanderlack parochia Sancta Catherina infra precinct turrim London gentleman aetatis sua 19 annorum, July 3rd 1650<ref>[[HCA 13/63 f.296v Annotate\|HCA 13/63 f.296v]]</ref>
		+	#Randolph Orton de Shadwell infra parochiam de Stepney in comitatu Middlesex naupegus aetatis 38. annorum, July 3rd 1650<ref>[[HCA 13/63 f.297v Annotate\|HCA 13/63 f.297v]]</ref>

	==Comment on sources==		==Comment on sources==

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 |Res country=England
 |Birth year=1628
 |Deposition start page(s)=HCA 13/63 f.294r Annotate,
 |Deposition date(s)=Jun 25 1650
@@ Line 23: / Line 24: @@
 |Has HCA evidence completed=No
 |Has source comment completed=No
 |Role in Silver Ship litigation=None
 }}

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 |Has opening text=Johannes Barley
 |Has signoff text=V
-|Transcription image={{#transcription-image: }}
+|Transcription image={{#transcription-image:  }}
 |Language skills=English language,
 |Res street=Wapping
@@ Line 30: / Line 30: @@
 ==Evidence from High Court of Admiralty==
-Twenty-two year old John Barley deposed on June 25th 1650. He was examined in the case of "Hans Claeson and Sery against Broadgate and Willson et cetera".<ref>[[HCA 13/63 f.294r Annotate|HCA 13/63 f.294r]]</ref>
+Twenty-two year old John Barley deposed on June 25th 1650. He was examined in the case of "Hans Claeson and Company against Broadgate and Willson et cetera".<ref>[[HCA 13/63 f.294r Annotate|HCA 13/63 f.294r]]</ref>
 ==Comment on sources==