HCA 3/47 f.41r Annotate - Revision history

ColinGreenstreet at 12:04, May 30, 2015

2015-05-30T12:04:06Z

ColinGreenstreet: Linked to existing image

2015-05-06T23:31:31Z

Linked to existing image

ColinGreenstreet: Created page with "{{PageMetaData |Parent volume=HCA 3/47 |Folio=41 |Side=Recto |Status=Pasted from Scripto on 03/05/2015; edited on 03/05/2015 by Colin Greenstreet |First transcriber=Colin Gree..."

2015-05-03T13:28:45Z

Created page with "{{PageMetaData |Parent volume=HCA 3/47 |Folio=41 |Side=Recto |Status=Pasted from Scripto on 03/05/2015; edited on 03/05/2015 by Colin Greenstreet |First transcriber=Colin Gree..."

New page

{{PageMetaData
|Parent volume=HCA 3/47
|Folio=41
|Side=Recto
|Status=Pasted from Scripto on 03/05/2015; edited on 03/05/2015 by Colin Greenstreet
|First transcriber=Colin Greenstreet
|First transcribed=2013/03/30
|Note=IMAGE: CIMG2177.JPG
}}
{{PageHelp}}
{{PageTranscription
|Transcription=Andrewes and Clutterbooke against}
hazlegrane Budd Suckley}

To heare sentence att Budds
petition Which day the said
Suckley gave an allegation in
writinge which the Judges at his petition
didd admitt soe farre as the same is
by lawe admissible which said allegation
beinge soe admitted and repeated and the
said Budd not beleevinge the same to bee
true the Judges assigned the same Suckley to
prove the said allegation the third Court day
from hence ita quad etcetera and decreed for the
answeares of the said Budds Clients the third
day after if etcetera/.

Marriott against Bowtill and}
Jagee Smith Suckley}

To heare sentence at Smiths
petition The like in the
presence of Smith dissentinge./

Ewers against Watts}
Clements B<help>XXX</help>d}

To heare sentence at Clements
petition Which day the said Clements
desired this cause to bee againe assigned
to sentence in the presence of the said Budd
dissentinge and as hee said givinge an allegation
in writinge which hee desired to bee admitted the
said Clements dissentinge and alleadginge that the
same ought not by lawe to bee admitted Whereupon
the Judges assigned to hear their order upon
the admission of the said allegation uppon
Satterday next in the morning and in case the
same bee not to bee admitted to heare sentence
the same time att the petition of the said
Clements,/..

Bancocke against Chambers}
and harris Smith Suckley}

To heare sentence in this
cause at Smiths petition
and both side are to bringe
their witnesses viva voce Which
day the Judges of the petition of the
said Smith did assigne to heare this
cause uppon Satterday next in the
morninge in this place peremptorily and
both sides to bringe what witnesses they have
viva voce in the presence of the said Suckley
dissentinge etcetera./.

Wetherell against Vincent}
ffrancklin Cheeke}

To heare sentence att ffrancklins
petition./.

John S<help>XXX</help>n against William}
Whittle Suckley Smith}

Whittle was monished to give
in his answer before this
day/

B<help>XXXX</help>
}}

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 |Folio=41
 |Side=Recto
-|Status=Pasted from Scripto on 03/05/2015; edited on 03/05/2015 by Colin Greenstreet
+|Status=Uploaded image; transcribed on 30/03/2013
 |First transcriber=Colin Greenstreet
 |First transcribed=2013/03/30
 |Note=IMAGE: CIMG2177.JPG
 }}

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 {{PageHelp}}
 {{PageTranscription
 |Transcription=Andrewes and Clutterbooke against&#125;
 hazlegrane Budd Suckley&#125;
@@ Line 25: / Line 26: @@
 from hence ita quad etcetera and decreed for the
 answeares of the said Budds Clients the third
-day after if etcetera/.
+day after if et cetera/.
 Marriott against Bowtill and&#125;
@@ Line 35: / Line 36: @@
 Ewers against Watts&#125;
-Clements B<help>XXX</help>d&#125;
+Clements B&#91;?XXX&#93;d&#125;
 To heare sentence at Clements
@@ Line 73: / Line 74: @@
 petition./.
-John S<help>XXX</help>n against William&#125;
+John S&#91;?XXXX&#93;n against William&#125;
 Whittle Suckley Smith&#125;
@@ Line 80: / Line 81: @@
 day/
-B<help>XXXX</help>
+B&#91;?XXXX&#93;
 }}