HCA 13/73 f.532r Annotate - Revision history

ColinGreenstreet at 05:50, May 29, 2015

2015-05-29T05:50:10Z

2014-06-09T09:25:22Z

2014-06-09T09:24:25Z

2014-06-09T09:22:05Z

2014-06-09T06:55:47Z

2014-06-09T06:55:04Z

2014-06-09T06:53:07Z

2014-06-08T05:18:00Z

2014-06-08T05:16:14Z

2014-06-08T05:15:26Z

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 |Folio=532
 |Side=Recto
-|Status=First cut transcription started and completed on 08/06/14
+|Status=Uploaded image; transcribed on 08/06/2014
-−
 |First transcriber=Colin Greenstreet
+|First transcribed=2014/06/08
-|First transcribed=14/06/08
+|Note=IMAGE: IMG_0279_copy.JPG
 }}
-|Editorial history=Created 07/06/14, by CSG
+{{PageHelp}}
-−
 }}{{PageHelp}}
 {{PageTranscription
-|Transcription image=[[File:IMG_0279_copy.JPG|thumbnail|800px|none|HCA 13/73 f.532r: Right click on image for full size image in separate window]]
+|Transcription image={{#transcription-image: IMG_0279_copy.JPG}}
-−
 |Transcription=&#91;CROSSED OUT PARTIAL DEPOSITION IN TOP ART OF MANUSCRIPT PAGE HAS NOT BEEN TRANSCRIBED&#93;
@@ Line 59: / Line 55: @@
 hee cannot depose.
-To the last hee saith his foregoeing deposition is true::/:
+To the last hee saith his foregoeing deposition is true&#58;&#58;/&#58;
 Repeated &#91;XXX&#93; duo Judicante
 William More &#91;SIGNATURE, RH SIDE&#93;
 |Primary sources='''TNA'''
@@ Line 76: / Line 71: @@
 PROB 11/306/12 Will of William More of Wapping, Middlesex 02 October 1661
 }}

@@ Line 48: / Line 48: @@
 equall sixteenth Parts of the good ship or vessell called the ''Samuell''
 of London, which bill of Sale, (being the bill of Sale annexed to the
-said allegation and now seene and perused by him vthis Deponent hee saith
+said allegation and now seene and perused by him this Deponent hee saith
 that the same was made by this Deponents servant by order of the said
 William Wright and was by him the said Wright really Signed Sealed

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:24, June 9, 2014
Line 66:		Line 66:

	\|Primary sources='''TNA'''		\|Primary sources='''TNA'''
		+
		+	<u>Chancery</u>
		+
		+	C 6/288/39 Short title: Peers v Edmunds. Plaintiffs: Richard Peers and Susannah Peers his wife. Defendants: Dorothy Edmunds. Subject: lands and personal estate of the deceased Joshua Waters, in Wapping, Middlesex, and Rotherhithe, Surrey. Document type: answer only. 1677

	<u>PROB</u>		<u>PROB</u>

@@ Line 53: / Line 53: @@
 and delivered in this Deponents Shopp in Wapping on the thirtieth day of November 1658. before
 Nine of the Clock in the forenoone of the said day, in the presence of
-him this deponent and James Wallace, and Bob Webb, which were then
+him this deponent and James Wallace, and Robert Webb, which were then
 this deponents servants who as witnesses thereof set their names on the back
 of the said bill, And the said Wright did then acknowledge himselfe

@@ Line 68: / Line 68: @@
 <u>PROB</u>
 PROB 11/306/12 Will of William More of Wapping, Middlesex 02 October 1661
 }}

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:55, June 9, 2014
Line 64:		Line 64:

	William More [SIGNATURE, RH SIDE]		William More [SIGNATURE, RH SIDE]
		+
		+	\|Primary sources='''TNA'''
		+
		+	<u>PROB</u>
		+
		+	PROB 11/306/12 Will of William More of Wapping, Middlesex 02 October 1661

	}}		}}

@@ Line 39: / Line 39: @@
 Wright become bound with him to one William Greene of
 Wapping in the summe of ffower hundred pounds for the payment
-of two hundred pounds, which vound this deponents servant (hee being a Scrivener)
+of two hundred pounds, which bond this deponents servant (hee being a Scrivener)
 made at the instance of the said Wright, And the said Wright
 for indemnifying and securing of the said Joshua Waters did