HCA 13/72 f.517r Annotate - Revision history

ColinGreenstreet at 16:25, November 25, 2015

2015-11-25T16:25:32Z

ColinGreenstreet at 20:13, September 25, 2013

2013-09-25T20:13:48Z

ColinGreenstreet at 20:11, September 25, 2013

2013-09-25T20:11:33Z

ColinGreenstreet at 19:38, September 24, 2013

2013-09-24T19:38:40Z

ColinGreenstreet at 19:38, September 24, 2013

2013-09-24T19:38:30Z

ColinGreenstreet at 19:38, September 24, 2013

2013-09-24T19:38:15Z

ColinGreenstreet at 19:36, September 24, 2013

2013-09-24T19:36:06Z

ColinGreenstreet at 19:35, September 24, 2013

2013-09-24T19:35:21Z

ColinGreenstreet at 19:35, September 24, 2013

2013-09-24T19:35:03Z

ColinGreenstreet at 19:26, September 24, 2013

2013-09-24T19:26:56Z

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 |Folio=517
 |Side=Recto
-|Status=First cut transcription started and completed on 24/09/13 by Colin Greenstreet
+|Status=Uploaded image; transcribed on 24/09/2013
-−
 |First transcriber=Colin Greenstreet
+|First transcribed=2013/09/24
-|First transcribed=13/09/24
+|Note=IMAGE: IMG_121_11_5362.JPG
 }}
-|Editorial history=Created 24/09/13, by CSG
+{{PageHelp}}
-−
 }}{{PageHelp}}
 {{PageTranscription
-|Transcription image=P1160211
+|Transcription image={{#transcription-image: IMG_121_11_5362.JPG}}
+|Transcription='''C3&#58;'''
-|Transcription='''C3:'''
 The 13th of August 1658.
@@ Line 21: / Line 17: @@
 A business of examination of witnesses on the)
 part and behalf of Abraham hill, John Gregory)
-henry C?rone, and Company owners of the ship the ''Olive)
+henry C?rone, and Company owners of the ship the ''Olive'')
-Branch'' of London against the Governour and Company of Dutch Merchants trading)
+''Branch'' of London against the Governour and Company of Dutch Merchants trading)
-&#91;GUTTER to&#93; the East Indyes in particular and all others in Generall that will take upon)
+&#91;?to&#93; the East Indyes in particular and all others in Generall that will take upon)
-&#91;GUTTER to&#93; Justify the staying of the said ship the ''Olive Branch'' from proceeding)
+&#91;?to&#93; Justify the staying of the said ship the ''Olive Branch'' from proceeding)
-&#91;GUTTER XXX&#93; into Bantam in the East Indias there to take in her Lading)
+&#91;?XXX&#93; into Bantam in the East Indias there to take in her Lading)
-Smith:/:)
+Smith&#58;/&#58;)
 Examined upon an allegation
@@ Line 79: / Line 75: @@
 London and was bound into Bantam, to take in his said ships  lading
 whereupon
 |Primary sources=<u>TNA</u>
@@ Line 92: / Line 87: @@
 PROB 11/403/281 Will of Abraham Hill, Vintner of London. 14 February 1691
 PROB 11/421/326 Will of Abraham Hill of Stepney, Middlesex. 24 July 1694
 }}

@@ Line 89: / Line 89: @@
 PROB 11/343/242 Will of John Gregory, Gentleman of Saint Mary Islington, Middlesex. 03 November 1673
 PROB 11/403/281 Will of Abraham Hill, Vintner of London. 14 February 1691
 PROB 11/421/326 Will of Abraham Hill of Stepney, Middlesex. 24 July 1694
 }}

@@ Line 79: / Line 79: @@
 London and was bound into Bantam, to take in his said ships  lading
 whereupon
 }}

@@ Line 66: / Line 66: @@
 other asterne her, and saith there were at the same time three
 other dutch shipps lying further off but in the way that the
-''Olive Branch'' was to passé to goe into Bantam, and saith that
+''Olive Branch'' was to passe to goe into Bantam, and saith that
 the said five dutch shipps were belonging (as was there commonly
 said and reported) to the East India Company of Holland or of

@@ Line 58: / Line 58: @@
 which hee knoweth being one of her company, namely her cheife
 mate when shee soe arrived.
 }}

← Older revision	Revision as of 19:38, September 24, 2013
(No difference)

← Older revision	Revision as of 19:36, September 24, 2013
(No difference)

@@ Line 45: / Line 45: @@
 vessel and of her tackle apparell and furniture, And further
 hee cannot depose
 }}