HCA 13/65 f.91v Annotate - Revision history

ColinGreenstreet at 08:06, July 6, 2014

2014-07-06T08:06:25Z

ColinGreenstreet at 13:14, March 24, 2014

2014-03-24T13:14:37Z

ColinGreenstreet at 13:14, March 24, 2014

2014-03-24T13:14:17Z

ColinGreenstreet at 12:38, March 24, 2014

2014-03-24T12:38:56Z

ColinGreenstreet at 08:42, March 24, 2014

2014-03-24T08:42:47Z

New page

{{PageMetaData
|Parent volume=HCA 13/65
|Folio=91
|Side=Verso
|Status=First cut transcription started and completed on 24/03/14 by Colin Greenstreet

|First transcriber=Colin Greenstreet

|First transcribed=14/03/24

|Editorial history=Created 24/03/14, by CSG

}}{{PageHelp}}
{{PageTranscription
|Transcription image=P1170557

|Transcription=XXX

}}

@@ Line 25: / Line 25: @@
 To the fowerth article of the said Allegation hee saith and deposeth
-that after such tyme as the roducent John Francisco Cordij had
+that after such tyme as the producent John Francisco Cordij had
 had put the Rice in this cause claymed abord the ship
 the ''Royall'' the said ship sayled therewith towards leghorne to which port shee

@@ Line 52: / Line 52: @@
 the River of Thames, att which tyme of the said surprizeall hee saith
 the said Rice was abord her. The premisses hee deposeth because
-hee this deponent was abord the ''Saint Martyn''' which was allsoe in company
+hee this deponent was abord the ''Saint Martyn'' which was allsoe in company
-ofand seized with the said ship the ''Royall'' And further hee cannot
+of and seized with the said ship the ''Royall'' And further hee cannot
 depose.

@@ Line 28: / Line 28: @@
 had put the Rice in this cause claymed abord the ship
 the ''Royall'' the said ship sayled therewith towards leghorne to which port shee
-was bound
+was bound to discharge and in the said ships Course hee saith shee
 }}

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 |Transcription image=P1170557
-|Transcription=XXX
+|Transcription=on the same day and upon the same
 }}